Cargando…
Platelet lysate for expansion or osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for 3D tissue constructs
BACKGROUND: The use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for the development of tissue-engineered constructs has advanced in recent years. However, future clinically approved products require following good manufacturing practice (GMP) guidelines. This includes using alternatives to xenogeneic-derived c...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japanese Society for Regenerative Medicine
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reth.2023.07.011 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: The use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for the development of tissue-engineered constructs has advanced in recent years. However, future clinically approved products require following good manufacturing practice (GMP) guidelines. This includes using alternatives to xenogeneic-derived cell culture supplements to avoid rejection of the transplants. Consequently, human platelet lysate (PLT) has been adopted as an affordable and effective alternative to foetal bovine serum (FBS) in traditional 2D cultures. However, little is known about its effect in more advanced 3D culture systems. METHODS: We evaluated bone marrow MSCs (BMSCs) proliferation and CD marker expression in cells expanded in FBS or PLT-supplemented media. Differentiation capacity of the BMSCs expanded in the presence of the different supplements was evaluated in 3D type I collagen hydrogels. Furthermore, the effects of the supplements on the process of differentiation were analyzed by using qPCR and histological staining. RESULTS: Cell proliferation was greater in PLT-supplemented media versus FBS. BMSCs expanded in PLT showed similar osteogenic differentiation capacity in 3D compared with FBS expanded cells. In contrast, when cells were 3D differentiated in PLT they showed lower osteogenesis versus the traditional FBS protocol. This was also the case for adipogenic differentiation, in which FBS supplementation was superior to PLT. CONCLUSIONS: PLT is a superior alternative to FBS for the expansion of MSCs without compromising their subsequent differentiation capacity in 3D. However, differentiation in PLT is impaired. Thus, PLT can be used to reduce the time required to expand the necessary cell numbers for development of 3D tissue engineered MSC constructs. |
---|