Cargando…
Structure of Health Information With Different Information Models: Evaluation Study With Competency Questions
BACKGROUND: There is a flora of health care information models but no consensus on which to use. This leads to poor information sharing and duplicate modelling work. The amount and type of differences between models has, to our knowledge, not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: This work aims to explore how...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37523221 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/46477 |
_version_ | 1785089922916417536 |
---|---|
author | Rossander, Anna Karlsson, Daniel |
author_facet | Rossander, Anna Karlsson, Daniel |
author_sort | Rossander, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a flora of health care information models but no consensus on which to use. This leads to poor information sharing and duplicate modelling work. The amount and type of differences between models has, to our knowledge, not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: This work aims to explore how information structured with various information models differ in practice. Our hypothesis is that differences between information models are overestimated. This work will also assess the usability of competency questions as a method for evaluation of information models within health care. METHODS: In this study, 4 information standards, 2 standards for secondary use, and 2 electronic health record systems were included as material. Competency questions were developed for a random selection of recommendations from a clinical guideline. The information needed to answer the competency questions was modelled according to each included information model, and the results were analyzed. Differences in structure and terminology were quantified for each combination of standards. RESULTS: In this study, 36 competency questions were developed and answered. In general, similarities between the included information models were larger than the differences. The demarcation between information model and terminology was overall similar; on average, 45% of the included structures were identical between models. Choices of terminology differed within and between models; on average, 11% was usable in interaction with each other. The information models included in this study were able to represent most information required for answering the competency questions. CONCLUSIONS: Different but same same; in practice, different information models structure much information in a similar fashion. To increase interoperability within and between systems, it is more important to move toward structuring information with any information model rather than finding or developing a perfect information model. Competency questions are a feasible way of evaluating how information models perform in practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10425817 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104258172023-08-16 Structure of Health Information With Different Information Models: Evaluation Study With Competency Questions Rossander, Anna Karlsson, Daniel JMIR Med Inform Original Paper BACKGROUND: There is a flora of health care information models but no consensus on which to use. This leads to poor information sharing and duplicate modelling work. The amount and type of differences between models has, to our knowledge, not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: This work aims to explore how information structured with various information models differ in practice. Our hypothesis is that differences between information models are overestimated. This work will also assess the usability of competency questions as a method for evaluation of information models within health care. METHODS: In this study, 4 information standards, 2 standards for secondary use, and 2 electronic health record systems were included as material. Competency questions were developed for a random selection of recommendations from a clinical guideline. The information needed to answer the competency questions was modelled according to each included information model, and the results were analyzed. Differences in structure and terminology were quantified for each combination of standards. RESULTS: In this study, 36 competency questions were developed and answered. In general, similarities between the included information models were larger than the differences. The demarcation between information model and terminology was overall similar; on average, 45% of the included structures were identical between models. Choices of terminology differed within and between models; on average, 11% was usable in interaction with each other. The information models included in this study were able to represent most information required for answering the competency questions. CONCLUSIONS: Different but same same; in practice, different information models structure much information in a similar fashion. To increase interoperability within and between systems, it is more important to move toward structuring information with any information model rather than finding or developing a perfect information model. Competency questions are a feasible way of evaluating how information models perform in practice. JMIR Publications 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10425817/ /pubmed/37523221 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/46477 Text en ©Anna Rossander, Daniel Karlsson. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (https://medinform.jmir.org), 31.07.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://medinform.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Rossander, Anna Karlsson, Daniel Structure of Health Information With Different Information Models: Evaluation Study With Competency Questions |
title | Structure of Health Information With Different Information Models: Evaluation Study With Competency Questions |
title_full | Structure of Health Information With Different Information Models: Evaluation Study With Competency Questions |
title_fullStr | Structure of Health Information With Different Information Models: Evaluation Study With Competency Questions |
title_full_unstemmed | Structure of Health Information With Different Information Models: Evaluation Study With Competency Questions |
title_short | Structure of Health Information With Different Information Models: Evaluation Study With Competency Questions |
title_sort | structure of health information with different information models: evaluation study with competency questions |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37523221 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/46477 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rossanderanna structureofhealthinformationwithdifferentinformationmodelsevaluationstudywithcompetencyquestions AT karlssondaniel structureofhealthinformationwithdifferentinformationmodelsevaluationstudywithcompetencyquestions |