Cargando…

Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Single Surgeon’s Experience

Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is one of the greatest advances in the field of urology and has been considered the gold standard in the treatment of renal calculi of more than 2 cm in size. While both the supine and prone positions offer their unique advantages, it is still being...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kannan, Deerush, Quadri, Mohsin, Sekaran, Praveen G, Paul, Rajesh, Panneerselvam, Aarthy, Jain, Nitesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588325
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41944
_version_ 1785089924719968256
author Kannan, Deerush
Quadri, Mohsin
Sekaran, Praveen G
Paul, Rajesh
Panneerselvam, Aarthy
Jain, Nitesh
author_facet Kannan, Deerush
Quadri, Mohsin
Sekaran, Praveen G
Paul, Rajesh
Panneerselvam, Aarthy
Jain, Nitesh
author_sort Kannan, Deerush
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is one of the greatest advances in the field of urology and has been considered the gold standard in the treatment of renal calculi of more than 2 cm in size. While both the supine and prone positions offer their unique advantages, it is still being debated which position offers the most in terms of surgical outcomes. We have evaluated the two approaches in terms of operative time, success rate, stone clearance rate, safety, and complications. Methods: This prospective cohort study was done in the urology department of a tertiary care center in South India between January 2018 and October 2020. A total of 166 patients, with 83 in supine and 83 in prone positions, were included in the study. Results: Both groups were matched in terms of age, body mass index, stone size and location, co-morbidities, medications taken, presence of diverticular stone, history of surgery, and baseline creatinine level. Mean operative time and pain scores were noted to be less in supine position as compared to prone. Ease of puncture was superior in supine position. Stone residue was noted to be higher in supine PCNL as well. Conclusion: Supine PCNLs are preferred in high-risk patients while the prone position is preferred in bilateral PCNLs, complex anatomy, or larger stone burden.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10425827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104258272023-08-16 Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Single Surgeon’s Experience Kannan, Deerush Quadri, Mohsin Sekaran, Praveen G Paul, Rajesh Panneerselvam, Aarthy Jain, Nitesh Cureus Urology Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is one of the greatest advances in the field of urology and has been considered the gold standard in the treatment of renal calculi of more than 2 cm in size. While both the supine and prone positions offer their unique advantages, it is still being debated which position offers the most in terms of surgical outcomes. We have evaluated the two approaches in terms of operative time, success rate, stone clearance rate, safety, and complications. Methods: This prospective cohort study was done in the urology department of a tertiary care center in South India between January 2018 and October 2020. A total of 166 patients, with 83 in supine and 83 in prone positions, were included in the study. Results: Both groups were matched in terms of age, body mass index, stone size and location, co-morbidities, medications taken, presence of diverticular stone, history of surgery, and baseline creatinine level. Mean operative time and pain scores were noted to be less in supine position as compared to prone. Ease of puncture was superior in supine position. Stone residue was noted to be higher in supine PCNL as well. Conclusion: Supine PCNLs are preferred in high-risk patients while the prone position is preferred in bilateral PCNLs, complex anatomy, or larger stone burden. Cureus 2023-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10425827/ /pubmed/37588325 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41944 Text en Copyright © 2023, Kannan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Urology
Kannan, Deerush
Quadri, Mohsin
Sekaran, Praveen G
Paul, Rajesh
Panneerselvam, Aarthy
Jain, Nitesh
Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Single Surgeon’s Experience
title Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Single Surgeon’s Experience
title_full Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Single Surgeon’s Experience
title_fullStr Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Single Surgeon’s Experience
title_full_unstemmed Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Single Surgeon’s Experience
title_short Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Single Surgeon’s Experience
title_sort supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (pcnl): a single surgeon’s experience
topic Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588325
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41944
work_keys_str_mv AT kannandeerush supineversuspronepercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlasinglesurgeonsexperience
AT quadrimohsin supineversuspronepercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlasinglesurgeonsexperience
AT sekaranpraveeng supineversuspronepercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlasinglesurgeonsexperience
AT paulrajesh supineversuspronepercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlasinglesurgeonsexperience
AT panneerselvamaarthy supineversuspronepercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlasinglesurgeonsexperience
AT jainnitesh supineversuspronepercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlasinglesurgeonsexperience