Cargando…
Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Single Surgeon’s Experience
Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is one of the greatest advances in the field of urology and has been considered the gold standard in the treatment of renal calculi of more than 2 cm in size. While both the supine and prone positions offer their unique advantages, it is still being...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588325 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41944 |
_version_ | 1785089924719968256 |
---|---|
author | Kannan, Deerush Quadri, Mohsin Sekaran, Praveen G Paul, Rajesh Panneerselvam, Aarthy Jain, Nitesh |
author_facet | Kannan, Deerush Quadri, Mohsin Sekaran, Praveen G Paul, Rajesh Panneerselvam, Aarthy Jain, Nitesh |
author_sort | Kannan, Deerush |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is one of the greatest advances in the field of urology and has been considered the gold standard in the treatment of renal calculi of more than 2 cm in size. While both the supine and prone positions offer their unique advantages, it is still being debated which position offers the most in terms of surgical outcomes. We have evaluated the two approaches in terms of operative time, success rate, stone clearance rate, safety, and complications. Methods: This prospective cohort study was done in the urology department of a tertiary care center in South India between January 2018 and October 2020. A total of 166 patients, with 83 in supine and 83 in prone positions, were included in the study. Results: Both groups were matched in terms of age, body mass index, stone size and location, co-morbidities, medications taken, presence of diverticular stone, history of surgery, and baseline creatinine level. Mean operative time and pain scores were noted to be less in supine position as compared to prone. Ease of puncture was superior in supine position. Stone residue was noted to be higher in supine PCNL as well. Conclusion: Supine PCNLs are preferred in high-risk patients while the prone position is preferred in bilateral PCNLs, complex anatomy, or larger stone burden. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10425827 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104258272023-08-16 Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Single Surgeon’s Experience Kannan, Deerush Quadri, Mohsin Sekaran, Praveen G Paul, Rajesh Panneerselvam, Aarthy Jain, Nitesh Cureus Urology Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is one of the greatest advances in the field of urology and has been considered the gold standard in the treatment of renal calculi of more than 2 cm in size. While both the supine and prone positions offer their unique advantages, it is still being debated which position offers the most in terms of surgical outcomes. We have evaluated the two approaches in terms of operative time, success rate, stone clearance rate, safety, and complications. Methods: This prospective cohort study was done in the urology department of a tertiary care center in South India between January 2018 and October 2020. A total of 166 patients, with 83 in supine and 83 in prone positions, were included in the study. Results: Both groups were matched in terms of age, body mass index, stone size and location, co-morbidities, medications taken, presence of diverticular stone, history of surgery, and baseline creatinine level. Mean operative time and pain scores were noted to be less in supine position as compared to prone. Ease of puncture was superior in supine position. Stone residue was noted to be higher in supine PCNL as well. Conclusion: Supine PCNLs are preferred in high-risk patients while the prone position is preferred in bilateral PCNLs, complex anatomy, or larger stone burden. Cureus 2023-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10425827/ /pubmed/37588325 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41944 Text en Copyright © 2023, Kannan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Urology Kannan, Deerush Quadri, Mohsin Sekaran, Praveen G Paul, Rajesh Panneerselvam, Aarthy Jain, Nitesh Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Single Surgeon’s Experience |
title | Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Single Surgeon’s Experience |
title_full | Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Single Surgeon’s Experience |
title_fullStr | Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Single Surgeon’s Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Single Surgeon’s Experience |
title_short | Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Single Surgeon’s Experience |
title_sort | supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (pcnl): a single surgeon’s experience |
topic | Urology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588325 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41944 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kannandeerush supineversuspronepercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlasinglesurgeonsexperience AT quadrimohsin supineversuspronepercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlasinglesurgeonsexperience AT sekaranpraveeng supineversuspronepercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlasinglesurgeonsexperience AT paulrajesh supineversuspronepercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlasinglesurgeonsexperience AT panneerselvamaarthy supineversuspronepercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlasinglesurgeonsexperience AT jainnitesh supineversuspronepercutaneousnephrolithotomypcnlasinglesurgeonsexperience |