Cargando…
A total inverse planning paradigm: Prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel MR-based 3D-printed head immobilization device
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Brain radiotherapy (cnsRT) requires reproducible positioning and immobilization, attained through redundant dedicated imaging studies and a bespoke moulding session to create a thermoplastic mask (T-mask). Innovative approaches may improve the value of care. We prospectively...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37587925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100663 |
_version_ | 1785089937292394496 |
---|---|
author | Jablonska, Paola Anna Parent, Amy La Macchia, Nancy Chan, Harley H.L. Filleti, Matthew Ramotar, Matthew Cho, Young-Bin Braganza, Maria Badzynski, Adam Laperriere, Normand Conrad, Tatiana Tsang, Derek S. Shultz, David Santiago, Anna Irish, Jonathan C. Millar, Barbara-Ann Tadic, Tony Berlin, Alejandro |
author_facet | Jablonska, Paola Anna Parent, Amy La Macchia, Nancy Chan, Harley H.L. Filleti, Matthew Ramotar, Matthew Cho, Young-Bin Braganza, Maria Badzynski, Adam Laperriere, Normand Conrad, Tatiana Tsang, Derek S. Shultz, David Santiago, Anna Irish, Jonathan C. Millar, Barbara-Ann Tadic, Tony Berlin, Alejandro |
author_sort | Jablonska, Paola Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Brain radiotherapy (cnsRT) requires reproducible positioning and immobilization, attained through redundant dedicated imaging studies and a bespoke moulding session to create a thermoplastic mask (T-mask). Innovative approaches may improve the value of care. We prospectively deployed and assessed the performance of a patient-specific 3D-printed mask (3Dp-mask), generated solely from MR imaging, to replicate a reproducible positioning and tolerable immobilization for patients undergoing cnsRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients undergoing LINAC-based cnsRT (primary tumors or resected metastases) were enrolled into two arms: control (T-mask) and investigational (3Dp-mask). For the latter, an in-house designed 3Dp-mask was generated from MR images to recreate the head positioning during MR acquisition and allow coupling with the LINAC tabletop. Differences in inter-fraction motion were compared between both arms. Tolerability was assessed using patient-reported questionnaires at various time points. RESULTS: Between January 2020 - July 2022, forty patients were enrolled (20 per arm). All participants completed the prescribed cnsRT and study evaluations. Average 3Dp-mask design and printing completion time was 36 h:50 min (range 12 h:56 min − 42 h:01 min). Inter-fraction motion analyses showed three-axis displacements comparable to the acceptable tolerance for the current standard-of-care. No differences in patient-reported tolerability were seen at baseline. During the last week of cnsRT, 3Dp-mask resulted in significantly lower facial and cervical discomfort and patients subjectively reported less pressure and confinement sensation when compared to the T-mask. No adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: The proposed total inverse planning paradigm using a 3D-printed immobilization device is feasible and renders comparable inter-fraction performance while offering a better patient experience, potentially improving cnsRT workflows and its cost-effectiveness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10425893 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104258932023-08-16 A total inverse planning paradigm: Prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel MR-based 3D-printed head immobilization device Jablonska, Paola Anna Parent, Amy La Macchia, Nancy Chan, Harley H.L. Filleti, Matthew Ramotar, Matthew Cho, Young-Bin Braganza, Maria Badzynski, Adam Laperriere, Normand Conrad, Tatiana Tsang, Derek S. Shultz, David Santiago, Anna Irish, Jonathan C. Millar, Barbara-Ann Tadic, Tony Berlin, Alejandro Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Brain radiotherapy (cnsRT) requires reproducible positioning and immobilization, attained through redundant dedicated imaging studies and a bespoke moulding session to create a thermoplastic mask (T-mask). Innovative approaches may improve the value of care. We prospectively deployed and assessed the performance of a patient-specific 3D-printed mask (3Dp-mask), generated solely from MR imaging, to replicate a reproducible positioning and tolerable immobilization for patients undergoing cnsRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients undergoing LINAC-based cnsRT (primary tumors or resected metastases) were enrolled into two arms: control (T-mask) and investigational (3Dp-mask). For the latter, an in-house designed 3Dp-mask was generated from MR images to recreate the head positioning during MR acquisition and allow coupling with the LINAC tabletop. Differences in inter-fraction motion were compared between both arms. Tolerability was assessed using patient-reported questionnaires at various time points. RESULTS: Between January 2020 - July 2022, forty patients were enrolled (20 per arm). All participants completed the prescribed cnsRT and study evaluations. Average 3Dp-mask design and printing completion time was 36 h:50 min (range 12 h:56 min − 42 h:01 min). Inter-fraction motion analyses showed three-axis displacements comparable to the acceptable tolerance for the current standard-of-care. No differences in patient-reported tolerability were seen at baseline. During the last week of cnsRT, 3Dp-mask resulted in significantly lower facial and cervical discomfort and patients subjectively reported less pressure and confinement sensation when compared to the T-mask. No adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: The proposed total inverse planning paradigm using a 3D-printed immobilization device is feasible and renders comparable inter-fraction performance while offering a better patient experience, potentially improving cnsRT workflows and its cost-effectiveness. Elsevier 2023-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10425893/ /pubmed/37587925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100663 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Jablonska, Paola Anna Parent, Amy La Macchia, Nancy Chan, Harley H.L. Filleti, Matthew Ramotar, Matthew Cho, Young-Bin Braganza, Maria Badzynski, Adam Laperriere, Normand Conrad, Tatiana Tsang, Derek S. Shultz, David Santiago, Anna Irish, Jonathan C. Millar, Barbara-Ann Tadic, Tony Berlin, Alejandro A total inverse planning paradigm: Prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel MR-based 3D-printed head immobilization device |
title | A total inverse planning paradigm: Prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel MR-based 3D-printed head immobilization device |
title_full | A total inverse planning paradigm: Prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel MR-based 3D-printed head immobilization device |
title_fullStr | A total inverse planning paradigm: Prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel MR-based 3D-printed head immobilization device |
title_full_unstemmed | A total inverse planning paradigm: Prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel MR-based 3D-printed head immobilization device |
title_short | A total inverse planning paradigm: Prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel MR-based 3D-printed head immobilization device |
title_sort | total inverse planning paradigm: prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel mr-based 3d-printed head immobilization device |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37587925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100663 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jablonskapaolaanna atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT parentamy atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT lamacchianancy atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT chanharleyhl atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT filletimatthew atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT ramotarmatthew atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT choyoungbin atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT braganzamaria atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT badzynskiadam atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT laperrierenormand atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT conradtatiana atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT tsangdereks atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT shultzdavid atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT santiagoanna atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT irishjonathanc atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT millarbarbaraann atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT tadictony atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT berlinalejandro atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT jablonskapaolaanna totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT parentamy totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT lamacchianancy totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT chanharleyhl totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT filletimatthew totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT ramotarmatthew totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT choyoungbin totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT braganzamaria totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT badzynskiadam totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT laperrierenormand totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT conradtatiana totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT tsangdereks totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT shultzdavid totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT santiagoanna totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT irishjonathanc totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT millarbarbaraann totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT tadictony totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice AT berlinalejandro totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice |