Cargando…

A total inverse planning paradigm: Prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel MR-based 3D-printed head immobilization device

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Brain radiotherapy (cnsRT) requires reproducible positioning and immobilization, attained through redundant dedicated imaging studies and a bespoke moulding session to create a thermoplastic mask (T-mask). Innovative approaches may improve the value of care. We prospectively...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jablonska, Paola Anna, Parent, Amy, La Macchia, Nancy, Chan, Harley H.L., Filleti, Matthew, Ramotar, Matthew, Cho, Young-Bin, Braganza, Maria, Badzynski, Adam, Laperriere, Normand, Conrad, Tatiana, Tsang, Derek S., Shultz, David, Santiago, Anna, Irish, Jonathan C., Millar, Barbara-Ann, Tadic, Tony, Berlin, Alejandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37587925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100663
_version_ 1785089937292394496
author Jablonska, Paola Anna
Parent, Amy
La Macchia, Nancy
Chan, Harley H.L.
Filleti, Matthew
Ramotar, Matthew
Cho, Young-Bin
Braganza, Maria
Badzynski, Adam
Laperriere, Normand
Conrad, Tatiana
Tsang, Derek S.
Shultz, David
Santiago, Anna
Irish, Jonathan C.
Millar, Barbara-Ann
Tadic, Tony
Berlin, Alejandro
author_facet Jablonska, Paola Anna
Parent, Amy
La Macchia, Nancy
Chan, Harley H.L.
Filleti, Matthew
Ramotar, Matthew
Cho, Young-Bin
Braganza, Maria
Badzynski, Adam
Laperriere, Normand
Conrad, Tatiana
Tsang, Derek S.
Shultz, David
Santiago, Anna
Irish, Jonathan C.
Millar, Barbara-Ann
Tadic, Tony
Berlin, Alejandro
author_sort Jablonska, Paola Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Brain radiotherapy (cnsRT) requires reproducible positioning and immobilization, attained through redundant dedicated imaging studies and a bespoke moulding session to create a thermoplastic mask (T-mask). Innovative approaches may improve the value of care. We prospectively deployed and assessed the performance of a patient-specific 3D-printed mask (3Dp-mask), generated solely from MR imaging, to replicate a reproducible positioning and tolerable immobilization for patients undergoing cnsRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients undergoing LINAC-based cnsRT (primary tumors or resected metastases) were enrolled into two arms: control (T-mask) and investigational (3Dp-mask). For the latter, an in-house designed 3Dp-mask was generated from MR images to recreate the head positioning during MR acquisition and allow coupling with the LINAC tabletop. Differences in inter-fraction motion were compared between both arms. Tolerability was assessed using patient-reported questionnaires at various time points. RESULTS: Between January 2020 - July 2022, forty patients were enrolled (20 per arm). All participants completed the prescribed cnsRT and study evaluations. Average 3Dp-mask design and printing completion time was 36 h:50 min (range 12 h:56 min − 42 h:01 min). Inter-fraction motion analyses showed three-axis displacements comparable to the acceptable tolerance for the current standard-of-care. No differences in patient-reported tolerability were seen at baseline. During the last week of cnsRT, 3Dp-mask resulted in significantly lower facial and cervical discomfort and patients subjectively reported less pressure and confinement sensation when compared to the T-mask. No adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: The proposed total inverse planning paradigm using a 3D-printed immobilization device is feasible and renders comparable inter-fraction performance while offering a better patient experience, potentially improving cnsRT workflows and its cost-effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10425893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104258932023-08-16 A total inverse planning paradigm: Prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel MR-based 3D-printed head immobilization device Jablonska, Paola Anna Parent, Amy La Macchia, Nancy Chan, Harley H.L. Filleti, Matthew Ramotar, Matthew Cho, Young-Bin Braganza, Maria Badzynski, Adam Laperriere, Normand Conrad, Tatiana Tsang, Derek S. Shultz, David Santiago, Anna Irish, Jonathan C. Millar, Barbara-Ann Tadic, Tony Berlin, Alejandro Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Brain radiotherapy (cnsRT) requires reproducible positioning and immobilization, attained through redundant dedicated imaging studies and a bespoke moulding session to create a thermoplastic mask (T-mask). Innovative approaches may improve the value of care. We prospectively deployed and assessed the performance of a patient-specific 3D-printed mask (3Dp-mask), generated solely from MR imaging, to replicate a reproducible positioning and tolerable immobilization for patients undergoing cnsRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients undergoing LINAC-based cnsRT (primary tumors or resected metastases) were enrolled into two arms: control (T-mask) and investigational (3Dp-mask). For the latter, an in-house designed 3Dp-mask was generated from MR images to recreate the head positioning during MR acquisition and allow coupling with the LINAC tabletop. Differences in inter-fraction motion were compared between both arms. Tolerability was assessed using patient-reported questionnaires at various time points. RESULTS: Between January 2020 - July 2022, forty patients were enrolled (20 per arm). All participants completed the prescribed cnsRT and study evaluations. Average 3Dp-mask design and printing completion time was 36 h:50 min (range 12 h:56 min − 42 h:01 min). Inter-fraction motion analyses showed three-axis displacements comparable to the acceptable tolerance for the current standard-of-care. No differences in patient-reported tolerability were seen at baseline. During the last week of cnsRT, 3Dp-mask resulted in significantly lower facial and cervical discomfort and patients subjectively reported less pressure and confinement sensation when compared to the T-mask. No adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: The proposed total inverse planning paradigm using a 3D-printed immobilization device is feasible and renders comparable inter-fraction performance while offering a better patient experience, potentially improving cnsRT workflows and its cost-effectiveness. Elsevier 2023-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10425893/ /pubmed/37587925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100663 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Jablonska, Paola Anna
Parent, Amy
La Macchia, Nancy
Chan, Harley H.L.
Filleti, Matthew
Ramotar, Matthew
Cho, Young-Bin
Braganza, Maria
Badzynski, Adam
Laperriere, Normand
Conrad, Tatiana
Tsang, Derek S.
Shultz, David
Santiago, Anna
Irish, Jonathan C.
Millar, Barbara-Ann
Tadic, Tony
Berlin, Alejandro
A total inverse planning paradigm: Prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel MR-based 3D-printed head immobilization device
title A total inverse planning paradigm: Prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel MR-based 3D-printed head immobilization device
title_full A total inverse planning paradigm: Prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel MR-based 3D-printed head immobilization device
title_fullStr A total inverse planning paradigm: Prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel MR-based 3D-printed head immobilization device
title_full_unstemmed A total inverse planning paradigm: Prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel MR-based 3D-printed head immobilization device
title_short A total inverse planning paradigm: Prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel MR-based 3D-printed head immobilization device
title_sort total inverse planning paradigm: prospective clinical trial evaluating the performance of a novel mr-based 3d-printed head immobilization device
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37587925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100663
work_keys_str_mv AT jablonskapaolaanna atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT parentamy atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT lamacchianancy atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT chanharleyhl atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT filletimatthew atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT ramotarmatthew atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT choyoungbin atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT braganzamaria atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT badzynskiadam atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT laperrierenormand atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT conradtatiana atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT tsangdereks atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT shultzdavid atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT santiagoanna atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT irishjonathanc atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT millarbarbaraann atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT tadictony atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT berlinalejandro atotalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT jablonskapaolaanna totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT parentamy totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT lamacchianancy totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT chanharleyhl totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT filletimatthew totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT ramotarmatthew totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT choyoungbin totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT braganzamaria totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT badzynskiadam totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT laperrierenormand totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT conradtatiana totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT tsangdereks totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT shultzdavid totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT santiagoanna totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT irishjonathanc totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT millarbarbaraann totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT tadictony totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice
AT berlinalejandro totalinverseplanningparadigmprospectiveclinicaltrialevaluatingtheperformanceofanovelmrbased3dprintedheadimmobilizationdevice