Cargando…
The emergence of ‘Transeurasian’ language families in Northeast Asia as viewed from archaeological evidence
From a linguistic standpoint, Proto-Japonic and Proto-Koreanic are assumed to have split off the Transeurasian languages in southern Manchuria. The linguistic idea that Proto-Japonic came earlier than Proto-Koreanic in the chronological scheme means that the Proto-Japonic language first entered the...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2021.49 |
_version_ | 1785089967292153856 |
---|---|
author | Miyamoto, Kazuo |
author_facet | Miyamoto, Kazuo |
author_sort | Miyamoto, Kazuo |
collection | PubMed |
description | From a linguistic standpoint, Proto-Japonic and Proto-Koreanic are assumed to have split off the Transeurasian languages in southern Manchuria. The linguistic idea that Proto-Japonic came earlier than Proto-Koreanic in the chronological scheme means that the Proto-Japonic language first entered the Korean Peninsula, and from there spread to the Japanese archipelago at the beginning of the Yayoi period, around the ninth century BC, while the arrival of Proto-Koreanic in southern Korea is associated with the spread of the rolled rim vessel culture around the fifth century BC. The genealogical sequence of the Pianpu, Mumun and Yayoi cultures, which shared the same pottery production techniques, indicates the spread of Proto-Japonic. On the other hand, migrants moved from Liaodong to the Korean Peninsula and established the rolled rim vessel culture. This population movement was probably due to social and political reasons as the Yan state enlarged its territory eastward. The Proto-Koreanic of the rolled rim vessel culture later spread to the Korean Peninsula and gradually drove out Proto-Japonic, becoming the predecessor of the Koreanic. In this paper, I examine the spread of Proto-Japonic and Proto-Koreanic in Northeast Asia based on archaeological evidence, focusing especially on the genealogy of pottery styles and pottery production techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10426040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104260402023-08-16 The emergence of ‘Transeurasian’ language families in Northeast Asia as viewed from archaeological evidence Miyamoto, Kazuo Evol Hum Sci Research Article From a linguistic standpoint, Proto-Japonic and Proto-Koreanic are assumed to have split off the Transeurasian languages in southern Manchuria. The linguistic idea that Proto-Japonic came earlier than Proto-Koreanic in the chronological scheme means that the Proto-Japonic language first entered the Korean Peninsula, and from there spread to the Japanese archipelago at the beginning of the Yayoi period, around the ninth century BC, while the arrival of Proto-Koreanic in southern Korea is associated with the spread of the rolled rim vessel culture around the fifth century BC. The genealogical sequence of the Pianpu, Mumun and Yayoi cultures, which shared the same pottery production techniques, indicates the spread of Proto-Japonic. On the other hand, migrants moved from Liaodong to the Korean Peninsula and established the rolled rim vessel culture. This population movement was probably due to social and political reasons as the Yan state enlarged its territory eastward. The Proto-Koreanic of the rolled rim vessel culture later spread to the Korean Peninsula and gradually drove out Proto-Japonic, becoming the predecessor of the Koreanic. In this paper, I examine the spread of Proto-Japonic and Proto-Koreanic in Northeast Asia based on archaeological evidence, focusing especially on the genealogy of pottery styles and pottery production techniques. Cambridge University Press 2022-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10426040/ /pubmed/37588923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2021.49 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Miyamoto, Kazuo The emergence of ‘Transeurasian’ language families in Northeast Asia as viewed from archaeological evidence |
title | The emergence of ‘Transeurasian’ language families in Northeast Asia as viewed from archaeological evidence |
title_full | The emergence of ‘Transeurasian’ language families in Northeast Asia as viewed from archaeological evidence |
title_fullStr | The emergence of ‘Transeurasian’ language families in Northeast Asia as viewed from archaeological evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | The emergence of ‘Transeurasian’ language families in Northeast Asia as viewed from archaeological evidence |
title_short | The emergence of ‘Transeurasian’ language families in Northeast Asia as viewed from archaeological evidence |
title_sort | emergence of ‘transeurasian’ language families in northeast asia as viewed from archaeological evidence |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2021.49 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miyamotokazuo theemergenceoftranseurasianlanguagefamiliesinnortheastasiaasviewedfromarchaeologicalevidence AT miyamotokazuo emergenceoftranseurasianlanguagefamiliesinnortheastasiaasviewedfromarchaeologicalevidence |