Cargando…

The emergence of ‘Transeurasian’ language families in Northeast Asia as viewed from archaeological evidence

From a linguistic standpoint, Proto-Japonic and Proto-Koreanic are assumed to have split off the Transeurasian languages in southern Manchuria. The linguistic idea that Proto-Japonic came earlier than Proto-Koreanic in the chronological scheme means that the Proto-Japonic language first entered the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Miyamoto, Kazuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2021.49
_version_ 1785089967292153856
author Miyamoto, Kazuo
author_facet Miyamoto, Kazuo
author_sort Miyamoto, Kazuo
collection PubMed
description From a linguistic standpoint, Proto-Japonic and Proto-Koreanic are assumed to have split off the Transeurasian languages in southern Manchuria. The linguistic idea that Proto-Japonic came earlier than Proto-Koreanic in the chronological scheme means that the Proto-Japonic language first entered the Korean Peninsula, and from there spread to the Japanese archipelago at the beginning of the Yayoi period, around the ninth century BC, while the arrival of Proto-Koreanic in southern Korea is associated with the spread of the rolled rim vessel culture around the fifth century BC. The genealogical sequence of the Pianpu, Mumun and Yayoi cultures, which shared the same pottery production techniques, indicates the spread of Proto-Japonic. On the other hand, migrants moved from Liaodong to the Korean Peninsula and established the rolled rim vessel culture. This population movement was probably due to social and political reasons as the Yan state enlarged its territory eastward. The Proto-Koreanic of the rolled rim vessel culture later spread to the Korean Peninsula and gradually drove out Proto-Japonic, becoming the predecessor of the Koreanic. In this paper, I examine the spread of Proto-Japonic and Proto-Koreanic in Northeast Asia based on archaeological evidence, focusing especially on the genealogy of pottery styles and pottery production techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10426040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104260402023-08-16 The emergence of ‘Transeurasian’ language families in Northeast Asia as viewed from archaeological evidence Miyamoto, Kazuo Evol Hum Sci Research Article From a linguistic standpoint, Proto-Japonic and Proto-Koreanic are assumed to have split off the Transeurasian languages in southern Manchuria. The linguistic idea that Proto-Japonic came earlier than Proto-Koreanic in the chronological scheme means that the Proto-Japonic language first entered the Korean Peninsula, and from there spread to the Japanese archipelago at the beginning of the Yayoi period, around the ninth century BC, while the arrival of Proto-Koreanic in southern Korea is associated with the spread of the rolled rim vessel culture around the fifth century BC. The genealogical sequence of the Pianpu, Mumun and Yayoi cultures, which shared the same pottery production techniques, indicates the spread of Proto-Japonic. On the other hand, migrants moved from Liaodong to the Korean Peninsula and established the rolled rim vessel culture. This population movement was probably due to social and political reasons as the Yan state enlarged its territory eastward. The Proto-Koreanic of the rolled rim vessel culture later spread to the Korean Peninsula and gradually drove out Proto-Japonic, becoming the predecessor of the Koreanic. In this paper, I examine the spread of Proto-Japonic and Proto-Koreanic in Northeast Asia based on archaeological evidence, focusing especially on the genealogy of pottery styles and pottery production techniques. Cambridge University Press 2022-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10426040/ /pubmed/37588923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2021.49 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Miyamoto, Kazuo
The emergence of ‘Transeurasian’ language families in Northeast Asia as viewed from archaeological evidence
title The emergence of ‘Transeurasian’ language families in Northeast Asia as viewed from archaeological evidence
title_full The emergence of ‘Transeurasian’ language families in Northeast Asia as viewed from archaeological evidence
title_fullStr The emergence of ‘Transeurasian’ language families in Northeast Asia as viewed from archaeological evidence
title_full_unstemmed The emergence of ‘Transeurasian’ language families in Northeast Asia as viewed from archaeological evidence
title_short The emergence of ‘Transeurasian’ language families in Northeast Asia as viewed from archaeological evidence
title_sort emergence of ‘transeurasian’ language families in northeast asia as viewed from archaeological evidence
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2021.49
work_keys_str_mv AT miyamotokazuo theemergenceoftranseurasianlanguagefamiliesinnortheastasiaasviewedfromarchaeologicalevidence
AT miyamotokazuo emergenceoftranseurasianlanguagefamiliesinnortheastasiaasviewedfromarchaeologicalevidence