Cargando…
Four levers of reciprocity across human societies: concepts, analysis and predictions
This paper surveys five human societal types – mobile foragers, horticulturalists, pre-state agriculturalists, state-based agriculturalists and liberal democracies – from the perspective of three core social problems faced by interacting individuals: coordination problems, social dilemmas and contes...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2022.7 |
_version_ | 1785089986863824896 |
---|---|
author | Lehmann, Laurent Powers, Simon T. van Schaik, Carel P. |
author_facet | Lehmann, Laurent Powers, Simon T. van Schaik, Carel P. |
author_sort | Lehmann, Laurent |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper surveys five human societal types – mobile foragers, horticulturalists, pre-state agriculturalists, state-based agriculturalists and liberal democracies – from the perspective of three core social problems faced by interacting individuals: coordination problems, social dilemmas and contest problems. We characterise the occurrence of these problems in the different societal types and enquire into the main force keeping societies together given the prevalence of these. To address this, we consider the social problems in light of the theory of repeated games, and delineate the role of intertemporal incentives in sustaining cooperative behaviour through the reciprocity principle. We analyse the population, economic and political structural features of the five societal types, and show that intertemporal incentives have been adapted to the changes in scope and scale of the core social problems as societies have grown in size. In all societies, reciprocity mechanisms appear to solve the social problems by enabling lifetime direct benefits to individuals for cooperation. Our analysis leads us to predict that as societies increase in complexity, they need more of the following four features to enable the scalability and adaptability of the reciprocity principle: nested grouping, decentralised enforcement and local information, centralised enforcement and coercive power, and formal rules. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10426116 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104261162023-08-16 Four levers of reciprocity across human societies: concepts, analysis and predictions Lehmann, Laurent Powers, Simon T. van Schaik, Carel P. Evol Hum Sci Perspective This paper surveys five human societal types – mobile foragers, horticulturalists, pre-state agriculturalists, state-based agriculturalists and liberal democracies – from the perspective of three core social problems faced by interacting individuals: coordination problems, social dilemmas and contest problems. We characterise the occurrence of these problems in the different societal types and enquire into the main force keeping societies together given the prevalence of these. To address this, we consider the social problems in light of the theory of repeated games, and delineate the role of intertemporal incentives in sustaining cooperative behaviour through the reciprocity principle. We analyse the population, economic and political structural features of the five societal types, and show that intertemporal incentives have been adapted to the changes in scope and scale of the core social problems as societies have grown in size. In all societies, reciprocity mechanisms appear to solve the social problems by enabling lifetime direct benefits to individuals for cooperation. Our analysis leads us to predict that as societies increase in complexity, they need more of the following four features to enable the scalability and adaptability of the reciprocity principle: nested grouping, decentralised enforcement and local information, centralised enforcement and coercive power, and formal rules. Cambridge University Press 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10426116/ /pubmed/37588908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2022.7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Perspective Lehmann, Laurent Powers, Simon T. van Schaik, Carel P. Four levers of reciprocity across human societies: concepts, analysis and predictions |
title | Four levers of reciprocity across human societies: concepts, analysis and predictions |
title_full | Four levers of reciprocity across human societies: concepts, analysis and predictions |
title_fullStr | Four levers of reciprocity across human societies: concepts, analysis and predictions |
title_full_unstemmed | Four levers of reciprocity across human societies: concepts, analysis and predictions |
title_short | Four levers of reciprocity across human societies: concepts, analysis and predictions |
title_sort | four levers of reciprocity across human societies: concepts, analysis and predictions |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2022.7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lehmannlaurent fourleversofreciprocityacrosshumansocietiesconceptsanalysisandpredictions AT powerssimont fourleversofreciprocityacrosshumansocietiesconceptsanalysisandpredictions AT vanschaikcarelp fourleversofreciprocityacrosshumansocietiesconceptsanalysisandpredictions |