Cargando…

Four levers of reciprocity across human societies: concepts, analysis and predictions

This paper surveys five human societal types – mobile foragers, horticulturalists, pre-state agriculturalists, state-based agriculturalists and liberal democracies – from the perspective of three core social problems faced by interacting individuals: coordination problems, social dilemmas and contes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lehmann, Laurent, Powers, Simon T., van Schaik, Carel P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2022.7
_version_ 1785089986863824896
author Lehmann, Laurent
Powers, Simon T.
van Schaik, Carel P.
author_facet Lehmann, Laurent
Powers, Simon T.
van Schaik, Carel P.
author_sort Lehmann, Laurent
collection PubMed
description This paper surveys five human societal types – mobile foragers, horticulturalists, pre-state agriculturalists, state-based agriculturalists and liberal democracies – from the perspective of three core social problems faced by interacting individuals: coordination problems, social dilemmas and contest problems. We characterise the occurrence of these problems in the different societal types and enquire into the main force keeping societies together given the prevalence of these. To address this, we consider the social problems in light of the theory of repeated games, and delineate the role of intertemporal incentives in sustaining cooperative behaviour through the reciprocity principle. We analyse the population, economic and political structural features of the five societal types, and show that intertemporal incentives have been adapted to the changes in scope and scale of the core social problems as societies have grown in size. In all societies, reciprocity mechanisms appear to solve the social problems by enabling lifetime direct benefits to individuals for cooperation. Our analysis leads us to predict that as societies increase in complexity, they need more of the following four features to enable the scalability and adaptability of the reciprocity principle: nested grouping, decentralised enforcement and local information, centralised enforcement and coercive power, and formal rules.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10426116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104261162023-08-16 Four levers of reciprocity across human societies: concepts, analysis and predictions Lehmann, Laurent Powers, Simon T. van Schaik, Carel P. Evol Hum Sci Perspective This paper surveys five human societal types – mobile foragers, horticulturalists, pre-state agriculturalists, state-based agriculturalists and liberal democracies – from the perspective of three core social problems faced by interacting individuals: coordination problems, social dilemmas and contest problems. We characterise the occurrence of these problems in the different societal types and enquire into the main force keeping societies together given the prevalence of these. To address this, we consider the social problems in light of the theory of repeated games, and delineate the role of intertemporal incentives in sustaining cooperative behaviour through the reciprocity principle. We analyse the population, economic and political structural features of the five societal types, and show that intertemporal incentives have been adapted to the changes in scope and scale of the core social problems as societies have grown in size. In all societies, reciprocity mechanisms appear to solve the social problems by enabling lifetime direct benefits to individuals for cooperation. Our analysis leads us to predict that as societies increase in complexity, they need more of the following four features to enable the scalability and adaptability of the reciprocity principle: nested grouping, decentralised enforcement and local information, centralised enforcement and coercive power, and formal rules. Cambridge University Press 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10426116/ /pubmed/37588908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2022.7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Perspective
Lehmann, Laurent
Powers, Simon T.
van Schaik, Carel P.
Four levers of reciprocity across human societies: concepts, analysis and predictions
title Four levers of reciprocity across human societies: concepts, analysis and predictions
title_full Four levers of reciprocity across human societies: concepts, analysis and predictions
title_fullStr Four levers of reciprocity across human societies: concepts, analysis and predictions
title_full_unstemmed Four levers of reciprocity across human societies: concepts, analysis and predictions
title_short Four levers of reciprocity across human societies: concepts, analysis and predictions
title_sort four levers of reciprocity across human societies: concepts, analysis and predictions
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2022.7
work_keys_str_mv AT lehmannlaurent fourleversofreciprocityacrosshumansocietiesconceptsanalysisandpredictions
AT powerssimont fourleversofreciprocityacrosshumansocietiesconceptsanalysisandpredictions
AT vanschaikcarelp fourleversofreciprocityacrosshumansocietiesconceptsanalysisandpredictions