Cargando…

Shared decision making and advance care planning: a systematic literature review and novel decision-making model

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Shared decision making (SDM) and advance care planning (ACP) are important evidence and ethics based concepts that can be translated in communication tools to aid the treatment decision-making process. Although both have been recommended in the care of patients with risks of com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosca, Ana, Karzig-Roduner, Isabelle, Kasper, Jürgen, Rogger, Niek, Drewniak, Daniel, Krones, Tanja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37580704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00944-7
_version_ 1785089992246165504
author Rosca, Ana
Karzig-Roduner, Isabelle
Kasper, Jürgen
Rogger, Niek
Drewniak, Daniel
Krones, Tanja
author_facet Rosca, Ana
Karzig-Roduner, Isabelle
Kasper, Jürgen
Rogger, Niek
Drewniak, Daniel
Krones, Tanja
author_sort Rosca, Ana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Shared decision making (SDM) and advance care planning (ACP) are important evidence and ethics based concepts that can be translated in communication tools to aid the treatment decision-making process. Although both have been recommended in the care of patients with risks of complications, they have not yet been described as two components of one single process. In this paper we aim to (1) assess how SDM and ACP is being applied, choosing patients with aortic stenosis with high and moderate treatment complication risks such as bleeding or stroke as an example, and (2) propose a model to best combine the two concepts and integrate them in the care process. METHODS: In order to assess how SDM and ACP is applied in usual care, we have performed a systematic literature review. The included studies have been analysed by means of thematic analysis as well as abductive reasoning to determine which SDM and ACP steps are applied as well as to propose a model of combining the two concepts into one process. RESULTS: The search in Medline, Cinahl, Embase, Scopus, Web of science, Psychinfo and Cochrane revealed 15 studies. Eleven describe various steps of SDM while four studies discuss the documentation of goals of care. Based on the review results and existing evidence we propose a model that combines SDM and ACP in one process for a complete patient informed choice. CONCLUSION: To be able to make informed choices about immediate and future care, patients should be engaged in both SDM and ACP decision-making processes. This allows for an iterative process in which each important decision-maker can share their expertise and concerns regarding the care planning and advance care planning. This would help to better structure and prioritize information while creating a trustful and respectful relationship between the participants. PROSPERO 2019. CRD42019124575 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-023-00944-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10426137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104261372023-08-16 Shared decision making and advance care planning: a systematic literature review and novel decision-making model Rosca, Ana Karzig-Roduner, Isabelle Kasper, Jürgen Rogger, Niek Drewniak, Daniel Krones, Tanja BMC Med Ethics Research BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Shared decision making (SDM) and advance care planning (ACP) are important evidence and ethics based concepts that can be translated in communication tools to aid the treatment decision-making process. Although both have been recommended in the care of patients with risks of complications, they have not yet been described as two components of one single process. In this paper we aim to (1) assess how SDM and ACP is being applied, choosing patients with aortic stenosis with high and moderate treatment complication risks such as bleeding or stroke as an example, and (2) propose a model to best combine the two concepts and integrate them in the care process. METHODS: In order to assess how SDM and ACP is applied in usual care, we have performed a systematic literature review. The included studies have been analysed by means of thematic analysis as well as abductive reasoning to determine which SDM and ACP steps are applied as well as to propose a model of combining the two concepts into one process. RESULTS: The search in Medline, Cinahl, Embase, Scopus, Web of science, Psychinfo and Cochrane revealed 15 studies. Eleven describe various steps of SDM while four studies discuss the documentation of goals of care. Based on the review results and existing evidence we propose a model that combines SDM and ACP in one process for a complete patient informed choice. CONCLUSION: To be able to make informed choices about immediate and future care, patients should be engaged in both SDM and ACP decision-making processes. This allows for an iterative process in which each important decision-maker can share their expertise and concerns regarding the care planning and advance care planning. This would help to better structure and prioritize information while creating a trustful and respectful relationship between the participants. PROSPERO 2019. CRD42019124575 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-023-00944-7. BioMed Central 2023-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10426137/ /pubmed/37580704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00944-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Rosca, Ana
Karzig-Roduner, Isabelle
Kasper, Jürgen
Rogger, Niek
Drewniak, Daniel
Krones, Tanja
Shared decision making and advance care planning: a systematic literature review and novel decision-making model
title Shared decision making and advance care planning: a systematic literature review and novel decision-making model
title_full Shared decision making and advance care planning: a systematic literature review and novel decision-making model
title_fullStr Shared decision making and advance care planning: a systematic literature review and novel decision-making model
title_full_unstemmed Shared decision making and advance care planning: a systematic literature review and novel decision-making model
title_short Shared decision making and advance care planning: a systematic literature review and novel decision-making model
title_sort shared decision making and advance care planning: a systematic literature review and novel decision-making model
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37580704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00944-7
work_keys_str_mv AT roscaana shareddecisionmakingandadvancecareplanningasystematicliteraturereviewandnoveldecisionmakingmodel
AT karzigrodunerisabelle shareddecisionmakingandadvancecareplanningasystematicliteraturereviewandnoveldecisionmakingmodel
AT kasperjurgen shareddecisionmakingandadvancecareplanningasystematicliteraturereviewandnoveldecisionmakingmodel
AT roggerniek shareddecisionmakingandadvancecareplanningasystematicliteraturereviewandnoveldecisionmakingmodel
AT drewniakdaniel shareddecisionmakingandadvancecareplanningasystematicliteraturereviewandnoveldecisionmakingmodel
AT kronestanja shareddecisionmakingandadvancecareplanningasystematicliteraturereviewandnoveldecisionmakingmodel