Cargando…

Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: While a number of treatment options exist for repair of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separation, none have emerged as the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on surgical treatment of acute, high-grade (Rockwood grades...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sonnier, John Hayden, Kemler, Bryson, Coladonato, Carlo, Paul, Ryan W., Tjoumakaris, Fotios P., Freedman, Kevin B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.10.002
_version_ 1785090084751540224
author Sonnier, John Hayden
Kemler, Bryson
Coladonato, Carlo
Paul, Ryan W.
Tjoumakaris, Fotios P.
Freedman, Kevin B.
author_facet Sonnier, John Hayden
Kemler, Bryson
Coladonato, Carlo
Paul, Ryan W.
Tjoumakaris, Fotios P.
Freedman, Kevin B.
author_sort Sonnier, John Hayden
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While a number of treatment options exist for repair of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separation, none have emerged as the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on surgical treatment of acute, high-grade (Rockwood grades III-V) ACJ separations in order to compare outcomes between direct fixation and tendon graft ligament reconstruction. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature evaluating outcomes for acute ACJ separation treatment with direct fixation or free biologic tendon graft reconstruction was performed. The following databases were examined: the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (1980-2021), and Embase (1980-2021). Studies were included if they reported a mean time to surgery as <6 weeks, contained >10 patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up, and reported clinical or radiographic outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 52 studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies reported outcomes following tendon graft ligament reconstruction (n = 128 patients). There were multiple methods of direct fixation. Thirty-three studies utilized suture button constructs (n = 1138), 16 studies used hook plates (n = 567), 2 studies used coracoclavicular screws (n = 94), 2 studies used suture fixation (n = 93), 2 studies used suture anchor (n = 55), 2 studies used suture cerclage fixation (n = 87), 1 used single multistrand titanium cable (n = 24), and 1 used K wire (n = 11). The mean follow-up Constant scores ranged from 77.5 to 97.1 in the fixation group compared to 90.3-96.6 in the tendon graft group. The mean visual analog scale scores ranged from 0 to 4.5 in the fixation group and 0.1-1 in the tendon graft group. Net CC distance ranged from 17.5 to 3.6 mm in the fixation group and 7.4-4 mm in the tendon graft group. The revision rates ranged from 0.0% to 18.18% in the direct fixation group and 5.88%-17% in the tendon graft group. CONCLUSION: Direct fixation and tendon graft reconstruction for management of acute, high-grade ACJ separations have similar patient subjective and radiographic outcomes, as well as complication and revision rates at a minimum 1-year follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10426581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104265812023-08-16 Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review Sonnier, John Hayden Kemler, Bryson Coladonato, Carlo Paul, Ryan W. Tjoumakaris, Fotios P. Freedman, Kevin B. JSES Rev Rep Tech Review BACKGROUND: While a number of treatment options exist for repair of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separation, none have emerged as the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on surgical treatment of acute, high-grade (Rockwood grades III-V) ACJ separations in order to compare outcomes between direct fixation and tendon graft ligament reconstruction. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature evaluating outcomes for acute ACJ separation treatment with direct fixation or free biologic tendon graft reconstruction was performed. The following databases were examined: the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (1980-2021), and Embase (1980-2021). Studies were included if they reported a mean time to surgery as <6 weeks, contained >10 patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up, and reported clinical or radiographic outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 52 studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies reported outcomes following tendon graft ligament reconstruction (n = 128 patients). There were multiple methods of direct fixation. Thirty-three studies utilized suture button constructs (n = 1138), 16 studies used hook plates (n = 567), 2 studies used coracoclavicular screws (n = 94), 2 studies used suture fixation (n = 93), 2 studies used suture anchor (n = 55), 2 studies used suture cerclage fixation (n = 87), 1 used single multistrand titanium cable (n = 24), and 1 used K wire (n = 11). The mean follow-up Constant scores ranged from 77.5 to 97.1 in the fixation group compared to 90.3-96.6 in the tendon graft group. The mean visual analog scale scores ranged from 0 to 4.5 in the fixation group and 0.1-1 in the tendon graft group. Net CC distance ranged from 17.5 to 3.6 mm in the fixation group and 7.4-4 mm in the tendon graft group. The revision rates ranged from 0.0% to 18.18% in the direct fixation group and 5.88%-17% in the tendon graft group. CONCLUSION: Direct fixation and tendon graft reconstruction for management of acute, high-grade ACJ separations have similar patient subjective and radiographic outcomes, as well as complication and revision rates at a minimum 1-year follow-up. Elsevier 2022-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10426581/ /pubmed/37588062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.10.002 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Sonnier, John Hayden
Kemler, Bryson
Coladonato, Carlo
Paul, Ryan W.
Tjoumakaris, Fotios P.
Freedman, Kevin B.
Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review
title Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review
title_full Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review
title_fullStr Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review
title_short Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review
title_sort surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.10.002
work_keys_str_mv AT sonnierjohnhayden surgicalmanagementofacutehighgradeacromioclavicularjointseparationsasystematicreview
AT kemlerbryson surgicalmanagementofacutehighgradeacromioclavicularjointseparationsasystematicreview
AT coladonatocarlo surgicalmanagementofacutehighgradeacromioclavicularjointseparationsasystematicreview
AT paulryanw surgicalmanagementofacutehighgradeacromioclavicularjointseparationsasystematicreview
AT tjoumakarisfotiosp surgicalmanagementofacutehighgradeacromioclavicularjointseparationsasystematicreview
AT freedmankevinb surgicalmanagementofacutehighgradeacromioclavicularjointseparationsasystematicreview