Cargando…
Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: While a number of treatment options exist for repair of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separation, none have emerged as the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on surgical treatment of acute, high-grade (Rockwood grades...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.10.002 |
_version_ | 1785090084751540224 |
---|---|
author | Sonnier, John Hayden Kemler, Bryson Coladonato, Carlo Paul, Ryan W. Tjoumakaris, Fotios P. Freedman, Kevin B. |
author_facet | Sonnier, John Hayden Kemler, Bryson Coladonato, Carlo Paul, Ryan W. Tjoumakaris, Fotios P. Freedman, Kevin B. |
author_sort | Sonnier, John Hayden |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While a number of treatment options exist for repair of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separation, none have emerged as the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on surgical treatment of acute, high-grade (Rockwood grades III-V) ACJ separations in order to compare outcomes between direct fixation and tendon graft ligament reconstruction. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature evaluating outcomes for acute ACJ separation treatment with direct fixation or free biologic tendon graft reconstruction was performed. The following databases were examined: the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (1980-2021), and Embase (1980-2021). Studies were included if they reported a mean time to surgery as <6 weeks, contained >10 patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up, and reported clinical or radiographic outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 52 studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies reported outcomes following tendon graft ligament reconstruction (n = 128 patients). There were multiple methods of direct fixation. Thirty-three studies utilized suture button constructs (n = 1138), 16 studies used hook plates (n = 567), 2 studies used coracoclavicular screws (n = 94), 2 studies used suture fixation (n = 93), 2 studies used suture anchor (n = 55), 2 studies used suture cerclage fixation (n = 87), 1 used single multistrand titanium cable (n = 24), and 1 used K wire (n = 11). The mean follow-up Constant scores ranged from 77.5 to 97.1 in the fixation group compared to 90.3-96.6 in the tendon graft group. The mean visual analog scale scores ranged from 0 to 4.5 in the fixation group and 0.1-1 in the tendon graft group. Net CC distance ranged from 17.5 to 3.6 mm in the fixation group and 7.4-4 mm in the tendon graft group. The revision rates ranged from 0.0% to 18.18% in the direct fixation group and 5.88%-17% in the tendon graft group. CONCLUSION: Direct fixation and tendon graft reconstruction for management of acute, high-grade ACJ separations have similar patient subjective and radiographic outcomes, as well as complication and revision rates at a minimum 1-year follow-up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10426581 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104265812023-08-16 Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review Sonnier, John Hayden Kemler, Bryson Coladonato, Carlo Paul, Ryan W. Tjoumakaris, Fotios P. Freedman, Kevin B. JSES Rev Rep Tech Review BACKGROUND: While a number of treatment options exist for repair of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separation, none have emerged as the standard of care. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on surgical treatment of acute, high-grade (Rockwood grades III-V) ACJ separations in order to compare outcomes between direct fixation and tendon graft ligament reconstruction. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature evaluating outcomes for acute ACJ separation treatment with direct fixation or free biologic tendon graft reconstruction was performed. The following databases were examined: the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (1980-2021), and Embase (1980-2021). Studies were included if they reported a mean time to surgery as <6 weeks, contained >10 patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up, and reported clinical or radiographic outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 52 studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies reported outcomes following tendon graft ligament reconstruction (n = 128 patients). There were multiple methods of direct fixation. Thirty-three studies utilized suture button constructs (n = 1138), 16 studies used hook plates (n = 567), 2 studies used coracoclavicular screws (n = 94), 2 studies used suture fixation (n = 93), 2 studies used suture anchor (n = 55), 2 studies used suture cerclage fixation (n = 87), 1 used single multistrand titanium cable (n = 24), and 1 used K wire (n = 11). The mean follow-up Constant scores ranged from 77.5 to 97.1 in the fixation group compared to 90.3-96.6 in the tendon graft group. The mean visual analog scale scores ranged from 0 to 4.5 in the fixation group and 0.1-1 in the tendon graft group. Net CC distance ranged from 17.5 to 3.6 mm in the fixation group and 7.4-4 mm in the tendon graft group. The revision rates ranged from 0.0% to 18.18% in the direct fixation group and 5.88%-17% in the tendon graft group. CONCLUSION: Direct fixation and tendon graft reconstruction for management of acute, high-grade ACJ separations have similar patient subjective and radiographic outcomes, as well as complication and revision rates at a minimum 1-year follow-up. Elsevier 2022-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10426581/ /pubmed/37588062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.10.002 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Sonnier, John Hayden Kemler, Bryson Coladonato, Carlo Paul, Ryan W. Tjoumakaris, Fotios P. Freedman, Kevin B. Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review |
title | Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review |
title_full | Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review |
title_short | Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review |
title_sort | surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.10.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sonnierjohnhayden surgicalmanagementofacutehighgradeacromioclavicularjointseparationsasystematicreview AT kemlerbryson surgicalmanagementofacutehighgradeacromioclavicularjointseparationsasystematicreview AT coladonatocarlo surgicalmanagementofacutehighgradeacromioclavicularjointseparationsasystematicreview AT paulryanw surgicalmanagementofacutehighgradeacromioclavicularjointseparationsasystematicreview AT tjoumakarisfotiosp surgicalmanagementofacutehighgradeacromioclavicularjointseparationsasystematicreview AT freedmankevinb surgicalmanagementofacutehighgradeacromioclavicularjointseparationsasystematicreview |