Cargando…

The number of shoulder and elbow questions on the orthopedic in-training examination is increasing with greater emphasis on critical thinking over recall

BACKGROUND: It is critical for orthopedic surgery residents and residency programs to have a current understanding of the content and resources utilized by the Orthopedic In-Training Examination (OITE) to continuously guide study and educational efforts. This study presents an updated analysis of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sudah, Suleiman Y., Faccone, Robert D., Michel, Christopher R., Dijanic, Christopher N., Kerrigan, Daniel J., Menendez, Mariano E., Namdari, Surena, Nicholson, Allen D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.03.006
_version_ 1785090101631516672
author Sudah, Suleiman Y.
Faccone, Robert D.
Michel, Christopher R.
Dijanic, Christopher N.
Kerrigan, Daniel J.
Menendez, Mariano E.
Namdari, Surena
Nicholson, Allen D.
author_facet Sudah, Suleiman Y.
Faccone, Robert D.
Michel, Christopher R.
Dijanic, Christopher N.
Kerrigan, Daniel J.
Menendez, Mariano E.
Namdari, Surena
Nicholson, Allen D.
author_sort Sudah, Suleiman Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is critical for orthopedic surgery residents and residency programs to have a current understanding of the content and resources utilized by the Orthopedic In-Training Examination (OITE) to continuously guide study and educational efforts. This study presents an updated analysis of the shoulder and elbow section of the OITE. METHODS: All OITE questions, answers, and references from 2013 to 2019 were reviewed. The number of shoulder and elbow questions per year was recorded, and questions were analyzed for topic, imaging modalities, cognitive taxonomy, and references. We compared our data to the results of a previous study that analyzed shoulder and elbow OITE questions from 2002 to 2007 to examine trends and changes in this domain overtime. RESULTS: There were 177 shoulder and elbow questions (126 shoulder, 71.2%; 51 elbow, 28.8%) of 1863 OITE questions (9.5%) over a 7-year period. The most commonly tested topics included degenerative joint disease/stiffness/arthroplasty (31.6%), anatomy/biomechanics (16.9%), instability/athletic injury (15.3%), trauma (14.7%), and rotator cuff (13.6%). Half of all questions involved clinical management decisions (49.7%). A total of 417 references were cited from 56 different sources, the most common of which were the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (23.3%), Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (20.4%), and Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) (16%). The average time lag from article publication to OITE reference was 7.7 years. Compared with a prior analysis from 2002 to 2007, there was a significant increase in the number of shoulder and elbow questions on the OITE (5.5% to 9.5%; P < .001). Recent exams incorporated more complex multistep treatment questions (4.4% vs. 49.7%; P < .001) and fewer recall questions (42.2% vs. 22%; P < .001). There was a significant increase in the use of imaging modalities (53.3% vs. 79.1%; P < .001). No significant differences in the distribution of question topics were found. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of shoulder and elbow questions on the OITE has nearly doubled over the past decade with greater emphasis on critical thinking (eg, clinical management decisions) over recall of facts. These findings should prompt educators to direct didactic efforts (eg, morning conferences and journal club) toward case-based learning to foster critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10426647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104266472023-08-16 The number of shoulder and elbow questions on the orthopedic in-training examination is increasing with greater emphasis on critical thinking over recall Sudah, Suleiman Y. Faccone, Robert D. Michel, Christopher R. Dijanic, Christopher N. Kerrigan, Daniel J. Menendez, Mariano E. Namdari, Surena Nicholson, Allen D. JSES Rev Rep Tech Full Length Articles and Reviews BACKGROUND: It is critical for orthopedic surgery residents and residency programs to have a current understanding of the content and resources utilized by the Orthopedic In-Training Examination (OITE) to continuously guide study and educational efforts. This study presents an updated analysis of the shoulder and elbow section of the OITE. METHODS: All OITE questions, answers, and references from 2013 to 2019 were reviewed. The number of shoulder and elbow questions per year was recorded, and questions were analyzed for topic, imaging modalities, cognitive taxonomy, and references. We compared our data to the results of a previous study that analyzed shoulder and elbow OITE questions from 2002 to 2007 to examine trends and changes in this domain overtime. RESULTS: There were 177 shoulder and elbow questions (126 shoulder, 71.2%; 51 elbow, 28.8%) of 1863 OITE questions (9.5%) over a 7-year period. The most commonly tested topics included degenerative joint disease/stiffness/arthroplasty (31.6%), anatomy/biomechanics (16.9%), instability/athletic injury (15.3%), trauma (14.7%), and rotator cuff (13.6%). Half of all questions involved clinical management decisions (49.7%). A total of 417 references were cited from 56 different sources, the most common of which were the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (23.3%), Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (20.4%), and Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) (16%). The average time lag from article publication to OITE reference was 7.7 years. Compared with a prior analysis from 2002 to 2007, there was a significant increase in the number of shoulder and elbow questions on the OITE (5.5% to 9.5%; P < .001). Recent exams incorporated more complex multistep treatment questions (4.4% vs. 49.7%; P < .001) and fewer recall questions (42.2% vs. 22%; P < .001). There was a significant increase in the use of imaging modalities (53.3% vs. 79.1%; P < .001). No significant differences in the distribution of question topics were found. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of shoulder and elbow questions on the OITE has nearly doubled over the past decade with greater emphasis on critical thinking (eg, clinical management decisions) over recall of facts. These findings should prompt educators to direct didactic efforts (eg, morning conferences and journal club) toward case-based learning to foster critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills. Elsevier 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10426647/ /pubmed/37588876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.03.006 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Full Length Articles and Reviews
Sudah, Suleiman Y.
Faccone, Robert D.
Michel, Christopher R.
Dijanic, Christopher N.
Kerrigan, Daniel J.
Menendez, Mariano E.
Namdari, Surena
Nicholson, Allen D.
The number of shoulder and elbow questions on the orthopedic in-training examination is increasing with greater emphasis on critical thinking over recall
title The number of shoulder and elbow questions on the orthopedic in-training examination is increasing with greater emphasis on critical thinking over recall
title_full The number of shoulder and elbow questions on the orthopedic in-training examination is increasing with greater emphasis on critical thinking over recall
title_fullStr The number of shoulder and elbow questions on the orthopedic in-training examination is increasing with greater emphasis on critical thinking over recall
title_full_unstemmed The number of shoulder and elbow questions on the orthopedic in-training examination is increasing with greater emphasis on critical thinking over recall
title_short The number of shoulder and elbow questions on the orthopedic in-training examination is increasing with greater emphasis on critical thinking over recall
title_sort number of shoulder and elbow questions on the orthopedic in-training examination is increasing with greater emphasis on critical thinking over recall
topic Full Length Articles and Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.03.006
work_keys_str_mv AT sudahsuleimany thenumberofshoulderandelbowquestionsontheorthopedicintrainingexaminationisincreasingwithgreateremphasisoncriticalthinkingoverrecall
AT facconerobertd thenumberofshoulderandelbowquestionsontheorthopedicintrainingexaminationisincreasingwithgreateremphasisoncriticalthinkingoverrecall
AT michelchristopherr thenumberofshoulderandelbowquestionsontheorthopedicintrainingexaminationisincreasingwithgreateremphasisoncriticalthinkingoverrecall
AT dijanicchristophern thenumberofshoulderandelbowquestionsontheorthopedicintrainingexaminationisincreasingwithgreateremphasisoncriticalthinkingoverrecall
AT kerrigandanielj thenumberofshoulderandelbowquestionsontheorthopedicintrainingexaminationisincreasingwithgreateremphasisoncriticalthinkingoverrecall
AT menendezmarianoe thenumberofshoulderandelbowquestionsontheorthopedicintrainingexaminationisincreasingwithgreateremphasisoncriticalthinkingoverrecall
AT namdarisurena thenumberofshoulderandelbowquestionsontheorthopedicintrainingexaminationisincreasingwithgreateremphasisoncriticalthinkingoverrecall
AT nicholsonallend thenumberofshoulderandelbowquestionsontheorthopedicintrainingexaminationisincreasingwithgreateremphasisoncriticalthinkingoverrecall
AT sudahsuleimany numberofshoulderandelbowquestionsontheorthopedicintrainingexaminationisincreasingwithgreateremphasisoncriticalthinkingoverrecall
AT facconerobertd numberofshoulderandelbowquestionsontheorthopedicintrainingexaminationisincreasingwithgreateremphasisoncriticalthinkingoverrecall
AT michelchristopherr numberofshoulderandelbowquestionsontheorthopedicintrainingexaminationisincreasingwithgreateremphasisoncriticalthinkingoverrecall
AT dijanicchristophern numberofshoulderandelbowquestionsontheorthopedicintrainingexaminationisincreasingwithgreateremphasisoncriticalthinkingoverrecall
AT kerrigandanielj numberofshoulderandelbowquestionsontheorthopedicintrainingexaminationisincreasingwithgreateremphasisoncriticalthinkingoverrecall
AT menendezmarianoe numberofshoulderandelbowquestionsontheorthopedicintrainingexaminationisincreasingwithgreateremphasisoncriticalthinkingoverrecall
AT namdarisurena numberofshoulderandelbowquestionsontheorthopedicintrainingexaminationisincreasingwithgreateremphasisoncriticalthinkingoverrecall
AT nicholsonallend numberofshoulderandelbowquestionsontheorthopedicintrainingexaminationisincreasingwithgreateremphasisoncriticalthinkingoverrecall