Cargando…
Characteristics of the Summating Potential Measured Across a Cochlear Implant Array as an Indicator of Cochlear Function
OBJECTIVES: The underlying state of cochlear and neural tissue function is known to affect postoperative speech perception following cochlear implantation. The ability to assess these tissues in patients can be performed using intracochlear electrocochleography (IC ECochG). One component of ECochG i...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36935398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001347 |
_version_ | 1785090132524662784 |
---|---|
author | Panario, Jared Bester, Christofer O’Leary, Stephen John |
author_facet | Panario, Jared Bester, Christofer O’Leary, Stephen John |
author_sort | Panario, Jared |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The underlying state of cochlear and neural tissue function is known to affect postoperative speech perception following cochlear implantation. The ability to assess these tissues in patients can be performed using intracochlear electrocochleography (IC ECochG). One component of ECochG is the summating potential (SP) that appears to be generated by multiple cochlear tissues. Its qualities may be able to detect the presence of functional inner hair cells, but evidence for this is limited in human cochleae. This study aimed to examine the IC SP characteristics in cochlear implantation recipients, its relationship to preoperative speech perception and audiometric thresholds, and to other IC ECochG components. DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of 113 patients’ IC ECochG recordings across the array in response to a 500 Hz tone burst stimulus. Responses to condensation and rarefaction stimuli were then subtracted from one another to emphasize the cochlear microphonic and added to one another to emphasize the SP, auditory nerve neurophonic, and compound action potential. Patients were grouped based on their maximum SP deflection being large and positive (+SP), large and negative (−SP), or minimal (0 SP) to further investigate these relationships. RESULTS: Patients in the +SP group had better preoperative speech perception (mean consonant-vowel-consonant phoneme score 46%) compared to the −SP and 0 SP groups (consonant-vowel-consonant phoneme scores 34% and 36%, respectively, difference to +SP: p < 0.05). Audiometric thresholds were lowest for +SP (mean pure-tone average 50 dB HL), then −SP (65 dB HL), and highest for 0 SP patients (70 dB HL), but there was not a statistical significance between +SP and −SP groups (p > 0.1). There were also distinct differences between SP groups in the qualities of their other ECochG components. These included the +SP patients having larger cochlear microphonic maximum amplitude, more apical SP peak electrode locations, and a more spatially specific SP magnitude growth pattern across the array. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with large positive SP deflection in IC ECochG have preoperatively better speech perception and lower audiometric thresholds than those without. Patterns in other ECochG components suggest its positive deflection may be an indicator of cochlear function. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10426787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104267872023-08-16 Characteristics of the Summating Potential Measured Across a Cochlear Implant Array as an Indicator of Cochlear Function Panario, Jared Bester, Christofer O’Leary, Stephen John Ear Hear Research Article OBJECTIVES: The underlying state of cochlear and neural tissue function is known to affect postoperative speech perception following cochlear implantation. The ability to assess these tissues in patients can be performed using intracochlear electrocochleography (IC ECochG). One component of ECochG is the summating potential (SP) that appears to be generated by multiple cochlear tissues. Its qualities may be able to detect the presence of functional inner hair cells, but evidence for this is limited in human cochleae. This study aimed to examine the IC SP characteristics in cochlear implantation recipients, its relationship to preoperative speech perception and audiometric thresholds, and to other IC ECochG components. DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of 113 patients’ IC ECochG recordings across the array in response to a 500 Hz tone burst stimulus. Responses to condensation and rarefaction stimuli were then subtracted from one another to emphasize the cochlear microphonic and added to one another to emphasize the SP, auditory nerve neurophonic, and compound action potential. Patients were grouped based on their maximum SP deflection being large and positive (+SP), large and negative (−SP), or minimal (0 SP) to further investigate these relationships. RESULTS: Patients in the +SP group had better preoperative speech perception (mean consonant-vowel-consonant phoneme score 46%) compared to the −SP and 0 SP groups (consonant-vowel-consonant phoneme scores 34% and 36%, respectively, difference to +SP: p < 0.05). Audiometric thresholds were lowest for +SP (mean pure-tone average 50 dB HL), then −SP (65 dB HL), and highest for 0 SP patients (70 dB HL), but there was not a statistical significance between +SP and −SP groups (p > 0.1). There were also distinct differences between SP groups in the qualities of their other ECochG components. These included the +SP patients having larger cochlear microphonic maximum amplitude, more apical SP peak electrode locations, and a more spatially specific SP magnitude growth pattern across the array. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with large positive SP deflection in IC ECochG have preoperatively better speech perception and lower audiometric thresholds than those without. Patterns in other ECochG components suggest its positive deflection may be an indicator of cochlear function. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-03-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10426787/ /pubmed/36935398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001347 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Ear & Hearing is published on behalf of the American Auditory Society, by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Panario, Jared Bester, Christofer O’Leary, Stephen John Characteristics of the Summating Potential Measured Across a Cochlear Implant Array as an Indicator of Cochlear Function |
title | Characteristics of the Summating Potential Measured Across a Cochlear Implant Array as an Indicator of Cochlear Function |
title_full | Characteristics of the Summating Potential Measured Across a Cochlear Implant Array as an Indicator of Cochlear Function |
title_fullStr | Characteristics of the Summating Potential Measured Across a Cochlear Implant Array as an Indicator of Cochlear Function |
title_full_unstemmed | Characteristics of the Summating Potential Measured Across a Cochlear Implant Array as an Indicator of Cochlear Function |
title_short | Characteristics of the Summating Potential Measured Across a Cochlear Implant Array as an Indicator of Cochlear Function |
title_sort | characteristics of the summating potential measured across a cochlear implant array as an indicator of cochlear function |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36935398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001347 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT panariojared characteristicsofthesummatingpotentialmeasuredacrossacochlearimplantarrayasanindicatorofcochlearfunction AT besterchristofer characteristicsofthesummatingpotentialmeasuredacrossacochlearimplantarrayasanindicatorofcochlearfunction AT olearystephenjohn characteristicsofthesummatingpotentialmeasuredacrossacochlearimplantarrayasanindicatorofcochlearfunction |