Cargando…
Disciplinary trends in the use of the Delphi method: A bibliometric analysis
The Delphi method is an iterative, anonymous, group-based process for eliciting and aggregating opinion on a topic to explore the existence of consensus among experts. The year 2023 marks the 60th anniversary of the first peer-reviewed journal article on the Delphi method. Originally developed for o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37582076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289009 |
_version_ | 1785090155971870720 |
---|---|
author | Khodyakov, Dmitry Grant, Sean Kroger, Jack Gadwah-Meaden, Catria Motala, Aneesa Larkin, Jody |
author_facet | Khodyakov, Dmitry Grant, Sean Kroger, Jack Gadwah-Meaden, Catria Motala, Aneesa Larkin, Jody |
author_sort | Khodyakov, Dmitry |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Delphi method is an iterative, anonymous, group-based process for eliciting and aggregating opinion on a topic to explore the existence of consensus among experts. The year 2023 marks the 60th anniversary of the first peer-reviewed journal article on the Delphi method. Originally developed for operations research, this method is now applied extensively by researchers representing diverse scientific fields. We used a bibliometric analysis to describe general trends in the expansion of its use across disciplines over time. We conducted a systematic literature search for all English-language, peer-reviewed journal articles on the Delphi method through its first 60 years. We found 19,831 articles: 96.8% (n = 19,204) on the actual use of the Delphi method in an empirical study and 3.2% (n = 627) describing, examining, or providing some guidance on how to use the Delphi method. Almost half (49.9%) of all articles were published in the 2010s and an additional third (32.5%) in the first few years of the 2020s. Nearly two-thirds (65%, n = 12,883) of all published articles have appeared in medical journals, compared to 15% in science and technology (n = 3,053) or social science (n = 3,016) journals. We conclude that the expanded use of the Delphi method has been driven largely by the medical field, though social scientists and technologists continue to be at the forefront of methodological work on the Delphi method. Therefore, we call for greater transdisciplinary collaboration on methodological guidance and standards for the Delphi method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10427003 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104270032023-08-16 Disciplinary trends in the use of the Delphi method: A bibliometric analysis Khodyakov, Dmitry Grant, Sean Kroger, Jack Gadwah-Meaden, Catria Motala, Aneesa Larkin, Jody PLoS One Research Article The Delphi method is an iterative, anonymous, group-based process for eliciting and aggregating opinion on a topic to explore the existence of consensus among experts. The year 2023 marks the 60th anniversary of the first peer-reviewed journal article on the Delphi method. Originally developed for operations research, this method is now applied extensively by researchers representing diverse scientific fields. We used a bibliometric analysis to describe general trends in the expansion of its use across disciplines over time. We conducted a systematic literature search for all English-language, peer-reviewed journal articles on the Delphi method through its first 60 years. We found 19,831 articles: 96.8% (n = 19,204) on the actual use of the Delphi method in an empirical study and 3.2% (n = 627) describing, examining, or providing some guidance on how to use the Delphi method. Almost half (49.9%) of all articles were published in the 2010s and an additional third (32.5%) in the first few years of the 2020s. Nearly two-thirds (65%, n = 12,883) of all published articles have appeared in medical journals, compared to 15% in science and technology (n = 3,053) or social science (n = 3,016) journals. We conclude that the expanded use of the Delphi method has been driven largely by the medical field, though social scientists and technologists continue to be at the forefront of methodological work on the Delphi method. Therefore, we call for greater transdisciplinary collaboration on methodological guidance and standards for the Delphi method. Public Library of Science 2023-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10427003/ /pubmed/37582076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289009 Text en © 2023 Khodyakov et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Khodyakov, Dmitry Grant, Sean Kroger, Jack Gadwah-Meaden, Catria Motala, Aneesa Larkin, Jody Disciplinary trends in the use of the Delphi method: A bibliometric analysis |
title | Disciplinary trends in the use of the Delphi method: A bibliometric analysis |
title_full | Disciplinary trends in the use of the Delphi method: A bibliometric analysis |
title_fullStr | Disciplinary trends in the use of the Delphi method: A bibliometric analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Disciplinary trends in the use of the Delphi method: A bibliometric analysis |
title_short | Disciplinary trends in the use of the Delphi method: A bibliometric analysis |
title_sort | disciplinary trends in the use of the delphi method: a bibliometric analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37582076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khodyakovdmitry disciplinarytrendsintheuseofthedelphimethodabibliometricanalysis AT grantsean disciplinarytrendsintheuseofthedelphimethodabibliometricanalysis AT krogerjack disciplinarytrendsintheuseofthedelphimethodabibliometricanalysis AT gadwahmeadencatria disciplinarytrendsintheuseofthedelphimethodabibliometricanalysis AT motalaaneesa disciplinarytrendsintheuseofthedelphimethodabibliometricanalysis AT larkinjody disciplinarytrendsintheuseofthedelphimethodabibliometricanalysis |