Cargando…

Disciplinary trends in the use of the Delphi method: A bibliometric analysis

The Delphi method is an iterative, anonymous, group-based process for eliciting and aggregating opinion on a topic to explore the existence of consensus among experts. The year 2023 marks the 60th anniversary of the first peer-reviewed journal article on the Delphi method. Originally developed for o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khodyakov, Dmitry, Grant, Sean, Kroger, Jack, Gadwah-Meaden, Catria, Motala, Aneesa, Larkin, Jody
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37582076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289009
_version_ 1785090155971870720
author Khodyakov, Dmitry
Grant, Sean
Kroger, Jack
Gadwah-Meaden, Catria
Motala, Aneesa
Larkin, Jody
author_facet Khodyakov, Dmitry
Grant, Sean
Kroger, Jack
Gadwah-Meaden, Catria
Motala, Aneesa
Larkin, Jody
author_sort Khodyakov, Dmitry
collection PubMed
description The Delphi method is an iterative, anonymous, group-based process for eliciting and aggregating opinion on a topic to explore the existence of consensus among experts. The year 2023 marks the 60th anniversary of the first peer-reviewed journal article on the Delphi method. Originally developed for operations research, this method is now applied extensively by researchers representing diverse scientific fields. We used a bibliometric analysis to describe general trends in the expansion of its use across disciplines over time. We conducted a systematic literature search for all English-language, peer-reviewed journal articles on the Delphi method through its first 60 years. We found 19,831 articles: 96.8% (n = 19,204) on the actual use of the Delphi method in an empirical study and 3.2% (n = 627) describing, examining, or providing some guidance on how to use the Delphi method. Almost half (49.9%) of all articles were published in the 2010s and an additional third (32.5%) in the first few years of the 2020s. Nearly two-thirds (65%, n = 12,883) of all published articles have appeared in medical journals, compared to 15% in science and technology (n = 3,053) or social science (n = 3,016) journals. We conclude that the expanded use of the Delphi method has been driven largely by the medical field, though social scientists and technologists continue to be at the forefront of methodological work on the Delphi method. Therefore, we call for greater transdisciplinary collaboration on methodological guidance and standards for the Delphi method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10427003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104270032023-08-16 Disciplinary trends in the use of the Delphi method: A bibliometric analysis Khodyakov, Dmitry Grant, Sean Kroger, Jack Gadwah-Meaden, Catria Motala, Aneesa Larkin, Jody PLoS One Research Article The Delphi method is an iterative, anonymous, group-based process for eliciting and aggregating opinion on a topic to explore the existence of consensus among experts. The year 2023 marks the 60th anniversary of the first peer-reviewed journal article on the Delphi method. Originally developed for operations research, this method is now applied extensively by researchers representing diverse scientific fields. We used a bibliometric analysis to describe general trends in the expansion of its use across disciplines over time. We conducted a systematic literature search for all English-language, peer-reviewed journal articles on the Delphi method through its first 60 years. We found 19,831 articles: 96.8% (n = 19,204) on the actual use of the Delphi method in an empirical study and 3.2% (n = 627) describing, examining, or providing some guidance on how to use the Delphi method. Almost half (49.9%) of all articles were published in the 2010s and an additional third (32.5%) in the first few years of the 2020s. Nearly two-thirds (65%, n = 12,883) of all published articles have appeared in medical journals, compared to 15% in science and technology (n = 3,053) or social science (n = 3,016) journals. We conclude that the expanded use of the Delphi method has been driven largely by the medical field, though social scientists and technologists continue to be at the forefront of methodological work on the Delphi method. Therefore, we call for greater transdisciplinary collaboration on methodological guidance and standards for the Delphi method. Public Library of Science 2023-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10427003/ /pubmed/37582076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289009 Text en © 2023 Khodyakov et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khodyakov, Dmitry
Grant, Sean
Kroger, Jack
Gadwah-Meaden, Catria
Motala, Aneesa
Larkin, Jody
Disciplinary trends in the use of the Delphi method: A bibliometric analysis
title Disciplinary trends in the use of the Delphi method: A bibliometric analysis
title_full Disciplinary trends in the use of the Delphi method: A bibliometric analysis
title_fullStr Disciplinary trends in the use of the Delphi method: A bibliometric analysis
title_full_unstemmed Disciplinary trends in the use of the Delphi method: A bibliometric analysis
title_short Disciplinary trends in the use of the Delphi method: A bibliometric analysis
title_sort disciplinary trends in the use of the delphi method: a bibliometric analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37582076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289009
work_keys_str_mv AT khodyakovdmitry disciplinarytrendsintheuseofthedelphimethodabibliometricanalysis
AT grantsean disciplinarytrendsintheuseofthedelphimethodabibliometricanalysis
AT krogerjack disciplinarytrendsintheuseofthedelphimethodabibliometricanalysis
AT gadwahmeadencatria disciplinarytrendsintheuseofthedelphimethodabibliometricanalysis
AT motalaaneesa disciplinarytrendsintheuseofthedelphimethodabibliometricanalysis
AT larkinjody disciplinarytrendsintheuseofthedelphimethodabibliometricanalysis