Cargando…

Tracing population movements in ancient East Asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production

Archaeolinguistics, a field which combines language reconstruction and archaeology as a source of information on human prehistory, has much to offer to deepen our understanding of the Neolithic and Bronze Age in Northeast Asia. So far, integrated comparative analyses of words and tools for textile p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nelson, Sarah, Zhushchikhovskaya, Irina, Li, Tao, Hudson, Mark, Robbeets, Martine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2020.4
_version_ 1785090196804468736
author Nelson, Sarah
Zhushchikhovskaya, Irina
Li, Tao
Hudson, Mark
Robbeets, Martine
author_facet Nelson, Sarah
Zhushchikhovskaya, Irina
Li, Tao
Hudson, Mark
Robbeets, Martine
author_sort Nelson, Sarah
collection PubMed
description Archaeolinguistics, a field which combines language reconstruction and archaeology as a source of information on human prehistory, has much to offer to deepen our understanding of the Neolithic and Bronze Age in Northeast Asia. So far, integrated comparative analyses of words and tools for textile production are completely lacking for the Northeast Asian Neolithic and Bronze Age. To remedy this situation, here we integrate linguistic and archaeological evidence of textile production, with the aim of shedding light on ancient population movements in Northeast China, the Russian Far East, Korea and Japan. We show that the transition to more sophisticated textile technology in these regions can be associated not only with the adoption of millet agriculture but also with the spread of the languages of the so-called ‘Transeurasian’ family. In this way, our research provides indirect support for the Language/Farming Dispersal Hypothesis, which posits that language expansion from the Neolithic onwards was often associated with agricultural colonization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10427276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104272762023-08-16 Tracing population movements in ancient East Asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production Nelson, Sarah Zhushchikhovskaya, Irina Li, Tao Hudson, Mark Robbeets, Martine Evol Hum Sci Review Archaeolinguistics, a field which combines language reconstruction and archaeology as a source of information on human prehistory, has much to offer to deepen our understanding of the Neolithic and Bronze Age in Northeast Asia. So far, integrated comparative analyses of words and tools for textile production are completely lacking for the Northeast Asian Neolithic and Bronze Age. To remedy this situation, here we integrate linguistic and archaeological evidence of textile production, with the aim of shedding light on ancient population movements in Northeast China, the Russian Far East, Korea and Japan. We show that the transition to more sophisticated textile technology in these regions can be associated not only with the adoption of millet agriculture but also with the spread of the languages of the so-called ‘Transeurasian’ family. In this way, our research provides indirect support for the Language/Farming Dispersal Hypothesis, which posits that language expansion from the Neolithic onwards was often associated with agricultural colonization. Cambridge University Press 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10427276/ /pubmed/37588355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2020.4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Nelson, Sarah
Zhushchikhovskaya, Irina
Li, Tao
Hudson, Mark
Robbeets, Martine
Tracing population movements in ancient East Asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production
title Tracing population movements in ancient East Asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production
title_full Tracing population movements in ancient East Asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production
title_fullStr Tracing population movements in ancient East Asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production
title_full_unstemmed Tracing population movements in ancient East Asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production
title_short Tracing population movements in ancient East Asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production
title_sort tracing population movements in ancient east asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2020.4
work_keys_str_mv AT nelsonsarah tracingpopulationmovementsinancienteastasiathroughthelinguisticsandarchaeologyoftextileproduction
AT zhushchikhovskayairina tracingpopulationmovementsinancienteastasiathroughthelinguisticsandarchaeologyoftextileproduction
AT litao tracingpopulationmovementsinancienteastasiathroughthelinguisticsandarchaeologyoftextileproduction
AT hudsonmark tracingpopulationmovementsinancienteastasiathroughthelinguisticsandarchaeologyoftextileproduction
AT robbeetsmartine tracingpopulationmovementsinancienteastasiathroughthelinguisticsandarchaeologyoftextileproduction