Cargando…

Why so many Agta boys? Explaining ‘extreme’ sex ratios in Philippine foragers

Male-biased sex ratios have been observed in multiple small-scale societies. Although intentional and systematic female-biased mortality has been posited as an explanation, there is often a lack of ethnographic evidence of systematic female neglect and/or infanticide. The Agta, a foraging population...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Page, Abigail E., Myers, Sarah, Dyble, Mark, Migliano, Andrea Bamberg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2019.4
_version_ 1785090204635234304
author Page, Abigail E.
Myers, Sarah
Dyble, Mark
Migliano, Andrea Bamberg
author_facet Page, Abigail E.
Myers, Sarah
Dyble, Mark
Migliano, Andrea Bamberg
author_sort Page, Abigail E.
collection PubMed
description Male-biased sex ratios have been observed in multiple small-scale societies. Although intentional and systematic female-biased mortality has been posited as an explanation, there is often a lack of ethnographic evidence of systematic female neglect and/or infanticide. The Agta, a foraging population from the Philippines, have a skewed sex ratio of 1.29 (129 males per 100 females) aged 15 years or under. We hypothesised that this skew was not caused by greater female deaths, but due to an adaptive response, where more males were produced at birth in reaction to high male-biased extrinsic mortality. To test this hypothesis we utilise census, childcare and mortality data from 915 Agta. The Agta's sex ratio is significantly male-biased in the <1 (n = 48, 2:1) and 1–5 year (n = 170, 1.39:1) age cohorts; however, we find no evidence of systematic female neglect in patterns of childcare. Furthermore, the sex ratio decreases over cohorts, becoming balanced by the end of the juvenile period, owing to significantly higher male mortality. Taken together, these results are not supportive of female infanticide or neglect, and instead suggest an adaptive mechanism, acting in utero as a response to male-biased juvenile mortality, following Fisherian principles of equalising parental investment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10427305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104273052023-08-16 Why so many Agta boys? Explaining ‘extreme’ sex ratios in Philippine foragers Page, Abigail E. Myers, Sarah Dyble, Mark Migliano, Andrea Bamberg Evol Hum Sci Research Article Male-biased sex ratios have been observed in multiple small-scale societies. Although intentional and systematic female-biased mortality has been posited as an explanation, there is often a lack of ethnographic evidence of systematic female neglect and/or infanticide. The Agta, a foraging population from the Philippines, have a skewed sex ratio of 1.29 (129 males per 100 females) aged 15 years or under. We hypothesised that this skew was not caused by greater female deaths, but due to an adaptive response, where more males were produced at birth in reaction to high male-biased extrinsic mortality. To test this hypothesis we utilise census, childcare and mortality data from 915 Agta. The Agta's sex ratio is significantly male-biased in the <1 (n = 48, 2:1) and 1–5 year (n = 170, 1.39:1) age cohorts; however, we find no evidence of systematic female neglect in patterns of childcare. Furthermore, the sex ratio decreases over cohorts, becoming balanced by the end of the juvenile period, owing to significantly higher male mortality. Taken together, these results are not supportive of female infanticide or neglect, and instead suggest an adaptive mechanism, acting in utero as a response to male-biased juvenile mortality, following Fisherian principles of equalising parental investment. Cambridge University Press 2019-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10427305/ /pubmed/37588404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2019.4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Page, Abigail E.
Myers, Sarah
Dyble, Mark
Migliano, Andrea Bamberg
Why so many Agta boys? Explaining ‘extreme’ sex ratios in Philippine foragers
title Why so many Agta boys? Explaining ‘extreme’ sex ratios in Philippine foragers
title_full Why so many Agta boys? Explaining ‘extreme’ sex ratios in Philippine foragers
title_fullStr Why so many Agta boys? Explaining ‘extreme’ sex ratios in Philippine foragers
title_full_unstemmed Why so many Agta boys? Explaining ‘extreme’ sex ratios in Philippine foragers
title_short Why so many Agta boys? Explaining ‘extreme’ sex ratios in Philippine foragers
title_sort why so many agta boys? explaining ‘extreme’ sex ratios in philippine foragers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2019.4
work_keys_str_mv AT pageabigaile whysomanyagtaboysexplainingextremesexratiosinphilippineforagers
AT myerssarah whysomanyagtaboysexplainingextremesexratiosinphilippineforagers
AT dyblemark whysomanyagtaboysexplainingextremesexratiosinphilippineforagers
AT miglianoandreabamberg whysomanyagtaboysexplainingextremesexratiosinphilippineforagers