Cargando…
Why so many Agta boys? Explaining ‘extreme’ sex ratios in Philippine foragers
Male-biased sex ratios have been observed in multiple small-scale societies. Although intentional and systematic female-biased mortality has been posited as an explanation, there is often a lack of ethnographic evidence of systematic female neglect and/or infanticide. The Agta, a foraging population...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2019.4 |
_version_ | 1785090204635234304 |
---|---|
author | Page, Abigail E. Myers, Sarah Dyble, Mark Migliano, Andrea Bamberg |
author_facet | Page, Abigail E. Myers, Sarah Dyble, Mark Migliano, Andrea Bamberg |
author_sort | Page, Abigail E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Male-biased sex ratios have been observed in multiple small-scale societies. Although intentional and systematic female-biased mortality has been posited as an explanation, there is often a lack of ethnographic evidence of systematic female neglect and/or infanticide. The Agta, a foraging population from the Philippines, have a skewed sex ratio of 1.29 (129 males per 100 females) aged 15 years or under. We hypothesised that this skew was not caused by greater female deaths, but due to an adaptive response, where more males were produced at birth in reaction to high male-biased extrinsic mortality. To test this hypothesis we utilise census, childcare and mortality data from 915 Agta. The Agta's sex ratio is significantly male-biased in the <1 (n = 48, 2:1) and 1–5 year (n = 170, 1.39:1) age cohorts; however, we find no evidence of systematic female neglect in patterns of childcare. Furthermore, the sex ratio decreases over cohorts, becoming balanced by the end of the juvenile period, owing to significantly higher male mortality. Taken together, these results are not supportive of female infanticide or neglect, and instead suggest an adaptive mechanism, acting in utero as a response to male-biased juvenile mortality, following Fisherian principles of equalising parental investment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10427305 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104273052023-08-16 Why so many Agta boys? Explaining ‘extreme’ sex ratios in Philippine foragers Page, Abigail E. Myers, Sarah Dyble, Mark Migliano, Andrea Bamberg Evol Hum Sci Research Article Male-biased sex ratios have been observed in multiple small-scale societies. Although intentional and systematic female-biased mortality has been posited as an explanation, there is often a lack of ethnographic evidence of systematic female neglect and/or infanticide. The Agta, a foraging population from the Philippines, have a skewed sex ratio of 1.29 (129 males per 100 females) aged 15 years or under. We hypothesised that this skew was not caused by greater female deaths, but due to an adaptive response, where more males were produced at birth in reaction to high male-biased extrinsic mortality. To test this hypothesis we utilise census, childcare and mortality data from 915 Agta. The Agta's sex ratio is significantly male-biased in the <1 (n = 48, 2:1) and 1–5 year (n = 170, 1.39:1) age cohorts; however, we find no evidence of systematic female neglect in patterns of childcare. Furthermore, the sex ratio decreases over cohorts, becoming balanced by the end of the juvenile period, owing to significantly higher male mortality. Taken together, these results are not supportive of female infanticide or neglect, and instead suggest an adaptive mechanism, acting in utero as a response to male-biased juvenile mortality, following Fisherian principles of equalising parental investment. Cambridge University Press 2019-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10427305/ /pubmed/37588404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2019.4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Page, Abigail E. Myers, Sarah Dyble, Mark Migliano, Andrea Bamberg Why so many Agta boys? Explaining ‘extreme’ sex ratios in Philippine foragers |
title | Why so many Agta boys? Explaining ‘extreme’ sex ratios in Philippine foragers |
title_full | Why so many Agta boys? Explaining ‘extreme’ sex ratios in Philippine foragers |
title_fullStr | Why so many Agta boys? Explaining ‘extreme’ sex ratios in Philippine foragers |
title_full_unstemmed | Why so many Agta boys? Explaining ‘extreme’ sex ratios in Philippine foragers |
title_short | Why so many Agta boys? Explaining ‘extreme’ sex ratios in Philippine foragers |
title_sort | why so many agta boys? explaining ‘extreme’ sex ratios in philippine foragers |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2019.4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pageabigaile whysomanyagtaboysexplainingextremesexratiosinphilippineforagers AT myerssarah whysomanyagtaboysexplainingextremesexratiosinphilippineforagers AT dyblemark whysomanyagtaboysexplainingextremesexratiosinphilippineforagers AT miglianoandreabamberg whysomanyagtaboysexplainingextremesexratiosinphilippineforagers |