Cargando…
Japan considered from the hypothesis of farmer/language spread
Formally, the Farming/Language Dispersal hypothesis as applied to Japan relates to the introduction of agriculture and spread of the Japanese language (between ca. 500 BC–AD 800). We review current data from genetics, archaeology, and linguistics in relation to this hypothesis. However, evidence bas...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2020.7 |
_version_ | 1785090250861707264 |
---|---|
author | de Boer, Elisabeth Yang, Melinda A. Kawagoe, Aileen Barnes, Gina L. |
author_facet | de Boer, Elisabeth Yang, Melinda A. Kawagoe, Aileen Barnes, Gina L. |
author_sort | de Boer, Elisabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | Formally, the Farming/Language Dispersal hypothesis as applied to Japan relates to the introduction of agriculture and spread of the Japanese language (between ca. 500 BC–AD 800). We review current data from genetics, archaeology, and linguistics in relation to this hypothesis. However, evidence bases for these disciplines are drawn from different periods. Genetic data have primarily been sampled from present-day Japanese and prehistoric Jōmon peoples (14,000–300 BC), preceding the introduction of rice agriculture. The best archaeological evidence for agriculture comes from western Japan during the Yayoi period (ca. 900 BC–AD 250), but little is known about northeastern Japan, which is a focal point here. And despite considerable hypothesizing about prehistoric language, the spread of historic languages/ dialects through the islands is more accessible but difficult to relate to prehistory. Though the lack of Yayoi skeletal material available for DNA analysis greatly inhibits direct study of how the pre-agricultural Jōmon peoples interacted with rice agriculturalists, our review of Jōmon genetics sets the stage for further research into their relationships. Modern linguistic research plays an unexpected role in bringing Izumo (Shimane Prefecture) and the Japan Sea coast into consideration in the populating of northeastern Honshu by agriculturalists beyond the Kantō region. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10427481 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104274812023-08-16 Japan considered from the hypothesis of farmer/language spread de Boer, Elisabeth Yang, Melinda A. Kawagoe, Aileen Barnes, Gina L. Evol Hum Sci Review Formally, the Farming/Language Dispersal hypothesis as applied to Japan relates to the introduction of agriculture and spread of the Japanese language (between ca. 500 BC–AD 800). We review current data from genetics, archaeology, and linguistics in relation to this hypothesis. However, evidence bases for these disciplines are drawn from different periods. Genetic data have primarily been sampled from present-day Japanese and prehistoric Jōmon peoples (14,000–300 BC), preceding the introduction of rice agriculture. The best archaeological evidence for agriculture comes from western Japan during the Yayoi period (ca. 900 BC–AD 250), but little is known about northeastern Japan, which is a focal point here. And despite considerable hypothesizing about prehistoric language, the spread of historic languages/ dialects through the islands is more accessible but difficult to relate to prehistory. Though the lack of Yayoi skeletal material available for DNA analysis greatly inhibits direct study of how the pre-agricultural Jōmon peoples interacted with rice agriculturalists, our review of Jōmon genetics sets the stage for further research into their relationships. Modern linguistic research plays an unexpected role in bringing Izumo (Shimane Prefecture) and the Japan Sea coast into consideration in the populating of northeastern Honshu by agriculturalists beyond the Kantō region. Cambridge University Press 2020-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10427481/ /pubmed/37588377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2020.7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review de Boer, Elisabeth Yang, Melinda A. Kawagoe, Aileen Barnes, Gina L. Japan considered from the hypothesis of farmer/language spread |
title | Japan considered from the hypothesis of farmer/language spread |
title_full | Japan considered from the hypothesis of farmer/language spread |
title_fullStr | Japan considered from the hypothesis of farmer/language spread |
title_full_unstemmed | Japan considered from the hypothesis of farmer/language spread |
title_short | Japan considered from the hypothesis of farmer/language spread |
title_sort | japan considered from the hypothesis of farmer/language spread |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2020.7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deboerelisabeth japanconsideredfromthehypothesisoffarmerlanguagespread AT yangmelindaa japanconsideredfromthehypothesisoffarmerlanguagespread AT kawagoeaileen japanconsideredfromthehypothesisoffarmerlanguagespread AT barnesginal japanconsideredfromthehypothesisoffarmerlanguagespread |