Cargando…
Pharyngeal Reconstruction Methods to Reduce the Risk of Pharyngocutaneous Fistula After Primary Total Laryngectomy: A Scoping Review
INTRODUCTION: The most common early postoperative complication after total laryngectomy (TL) is pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF). Rates of PCF are higher in patients who undergo salvage TL compared with primary TL. Published meta-analyses include heterogeneous studies making the conclusions difficult...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37436593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-023-02561-7 |
_version_ | 1785090262063644672 |
---|---|
author | Sanabria, Alvaro Olivera, María Paula Chiesa-Estomba, Carlos Hamoir, Marc Kowalski, Luiz P. López, Fernando Mäkitie, Antti Robbins, K. Thomas Rodrigo, Juan Pablo Piazza, Cesare Shaha, Ashok Sjögren, Elizabeth Suarez, Carlos Zafereo, Mark Ferlito, Alfio |
author_facet | Sanabria, Alvaro Olivera, María Paula Chiesa-Estomba, Carlos Hamoir, Marc Kowalski, Luiz P. López, Fernando Mäkitie, Antti Robbins, K. Thomas Rodrigo, Juan Pablo Piazza, Cesare Shaha, Ashok Sjögren, Elizabeth Suarez, Carlos Zafereo, Mark Ferlito, Alfio |
author_sort | Sanabria, Alvaro |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The most common early postoperative complication after total laryngectomy (TL) is pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF). Rates of PCF are higher in patients who undergo salvage TL compared with primary TL. Published meta-analyses include heterogeneous studies making the conclusions difficult to interpret. The objectives of this scoping review were to explore the reconstructive techniques potentially available for primary TL and to clarify which could be the best technique for each clinical scenario. METHODS: A list of available reconstructive techniques for primary TL was built and the potential comparisons between techniques were identified. A PubMed literature search was performed from inception to August 2022. Only case–control, comparative cohort, or randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies were included. RESULTS: A meta-analysis of seven original studies showed a PCF risk difference (RD) of 14% (95% CI 8–20%) favoring stapler closure over manual suture. In a meta-analysis of 12 studies, we could not find statistically significant differences in PCF risk between primary vertical suture and T-shaped suture. Evidence for other pharyngeal closure alternatives is scarce. CONCLUSION: We could not identify differences in the rate of PCF between continuous and T-shape suture configuration. Stapler closure seems to be followed by a lower rate of PCF than manual suture in those patients that are good candidates for this technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10427525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104275252023-08-17 Pharyngeal Reconstruction Methods to Reduce the Risk of Pharyngocutaneous Fistula After Primary Total Laryngectomy: A Scoping Review Sanabria, Alvaro Olivera, María Paula Chiesa-Estomba, Carlos Hamoir, Marc Kowalski, Luiz P. López, Fernando Mäkitie, Antti Robbins, K. Thomas Rodrigo, Juan Pablo Piazza, Cesare Shaha, Ashok Sjögren, Elizabeth Suarez, Carlos Zafereo, Mark Ferlito, Alfio Adv Ther Review INTRODUCTION: The most common early postoperative complication after total laryngectomy (TL) is pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF). Rates of PCF are higher in patients who undergo salvage TL compared with primary TL. Published meta-analyses include heterogeneous studies making the conclusions difficult to interpret. The objectives of this scoping review were to explore the reconstructive techniques potentially available for primary TL and to clarify which could be the best technique for each clinical scenario. METHODS: A list of available reconstructive techniques for primary TL was built and the potential comparisons between techniques were identified. A PubMed literature search was performed from inception to August 2022. Only case–control, comparative cohort, or randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies were included. RESULTS: A meta-analysis of seven original studies showed a PCF risk difference (RD) of 14% (95% CI 8–20%) favoring stapler closure over manual suture. In a meta-analysis of 12 studies, we could not find statistically significant differences in PCF risk between primary vertical suture and T-shaped suture. Evidence for other pharyngeal closure alternatives is scarce. CONCLUSION: We could not identify differences in the rate of PCF between continuous and T-shape suture configuration. Stapler closure seems to be followed by a lower rate of PCF than manual suture in those patients that are good candidates for this technique. Springer Healthcare 2023-07-12 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10427525/ /pubmed/37436593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-023-02561-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Sanabria, Alvaro Olivera, María Paula Chiesa-Estomba, Carlos Hamoir, Marc Kowalski, Luiz P. López, Fernando Mäkitie, Antti Robbins, K. Thomas Rodrigo, Juan Pablo Piazza, Cesare Shaha, Ashok Sjögren, Elizabeth Suarez, Carlos Zafereo, Mark Ferlito, Alfio Pharyngeal Reconstruction Methods to Reduce the Risk of Pharyngocutaneous Fistula After Primary Total Laryngectomy: A Scoping Review |
title | Pharyngeal Reconstruction Methods to Reduce the Risk of Pharyngocutaneous Fistula After Primary Total Laryngectomy: A Scoping Review |
title_full | Pharyngeal Reconstruction Methods to Reduce the Risk of Pharyngocutaneous Fistula After Primary Total Laryngectomy: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Pharyngeal Reconstruction Methods to Reduce the Risk of Pharyngocutaneous Fistula After Primary Total Laryngectomy: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Pharyngeal Reconstruction Methods to Reduce the Risk of Pharyngocutaneous Fistula After Primary Total Laryngectomy: A Scoping Review |
title_short | Pharyngeal Reconstruction Methods to Reduce the Risk of Pharyngocutaneous Fistula After Primary Total Laryngectomy: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | pharyngeal reconstruction methods to reduce the risk of pharyngocutaneous fistula after primary total laryngectomy: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37436593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-023-02561-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanabriaalvaro pharyngealreconstructionmethodstoreducetheriskofpharyngocutaneousfistulaafterprimarytotallaryngectomyascopingreview AT oliveramariapaula pharyngealreconstructionmethodstoreducetheriskofpharyngocutaneousfistulaafterprimarytotallaryngectomyascopingreview AT chiesaestombacarlos pharyngealreconstructionmethodstoreducetheriskofpharyngocutaneousfistulaafterprimarytotallaryngectomyascopingreview AT hamoirmarc pharyngealreconstructionmethodstoreducetheriskofpharyngocutaneousfistulaafterprimarytotallaryngectomyascopingreview AT kowalskiluizp pharyngealreconstructionmethodstoreducetheriskofpharyngocutaneousfistulaafterprimarytotallaryngectomyascopingreview AT lopezfernando pharyngealreconstructionmethodstoreducetheriskofpharyngocutaneousfistulaafterprimarytotallaryngectomyascopingreview AT makitieantti pharyngealreconstructionmethodstoreducetheriskofpharyngocutaneousfistulaafterprimarytotallaryngectomyascopingreview AT robbinskthomas pharyngealreconstructionmethodstoreducetheriskofpharyngocutaneousfistulaafterprimarytotallaryngectomyascopingreview AT rodrigojuanpablo pharyngealreconstructionmethodstoreducetheriskofpharyngocutaneousfistulaafterprimarytotallaryngectomyascopingreview AT piazzacesare pharyngealreconstructionmethodstoreducetheriskofpharyngocutaneousfistulaafterprimarytotallaryngectomyascopingreview AT shahaashok pharyngealreconstructionmethodstoreducetheriskofpharyngocutaneousfistulaafterprimarytotallaryngectomyascopingreview AT sjogrenelizabeth pharyngealreconstructionmethodstoreducetheriskofpharyngocutaneousfistulaafterprimarytotallaryngectomyascopingreview AT suarezcarlos pharyngealreconstructionmethodstoreducetheriskofpharyngocutaneousfistulaafterprimarytotallaryngectomyascopingreview AT zafereomark pharyngealreconstructionmethodstoreducetheriskofpharyngocutaneousfistulaafterprimarytotallaryngectomyascopingreview AT ferlitoalfio pharyngealreconstructionmethodstoreducetheriskofpharyngocutaneousfistulaafterprimarytotallaryngectomyascopingreview |