Cargando…

Artificial intelligence algorithm comparison and ranking for weight prediction in sheep

In a rapidly transforming world, farm data is growing exponentially. Realizing the importance of this data, researchers are looking for new solutions to analyse this data and make farming predictions. Artificial Intelligence, with its capacity to handle big data is rapidly becoming popular. In addit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamadani, Ambreen, Ganai, Nazir Ahmad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37582936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40528-4
_version_ 1785090283090739200
author Hamadani, Ambreen
Ganai, Nazir Ahmad
author_facet Hamadani, Ambreen
Ganai, Nazir Ahmad
author_sort Hamadani, Ambreen
collection PubMed
description In a rapidly transforming world, farm data is growing exponentially. Realizing the importance of this data, researchers are looking for new solutions to analyse this data and make farming predictions. Artificial Intelligence, with its capacity to handle big data is rapidly becoming popular. In addition, it can also handle non-linear, noisy data and is not limited by the conditions required for conventional data analysis. This study was therefore undertaken to compare the most popular machine learning (ML) algorithms and rank them as per their ability to make predictions on sheep farm data spanning 11 years. Data was cleaned and prepared was done before analysis. Winsorization was done for outlier removal. Principal component analysis (PCA) and feature selection (FS) were done and based on that, three datasets were created viz. PCA (wherein only PCA was used), PCA+ FS (both techniques used for dimensionality reduction), and FS (only feature selection used) bodyweight prediction. Among the 11 ML algorithms that were evaluated, the correlations between true and predicted values for MARS algorithm, Bayesian ridge regression, Ridge regression, Support Vector Machines, Gradient boosting algorithm, Random forests, XgBoost algorithm, Artificial neural networks, Classification and regression trees, Polynomial regression, K nearest neighbours and Genetic Algorithms were 0.993, 0.992, 0.991, 0.991, 0.991, 0.99, 0.99, 0.984, 0.984, 0.957, 0.949, 0.734 respectively for bodyweights. The top five algorithms for the prediction of bodyweights, were MARS, Bayesian ridge regression, Ridge regression, Support Vector Machines and Gradient boosting algorithm. A total of 12 machine learning models were developed for the prediction of bodyweights in sheep in the present study. It may be said that machine learning techniques can perform predictions with reasonable accuracies and can thus help in drawing inferences and making futuristic predictions on farms for their economic prosperity, performance improvement and subsequently food security.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10427635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104276352023-08-17 Artificial intelligence algorithm comparison and ranking for weight prediction in sheep Hamadani, Ambreen Ganai, Nazir Ahmad Sci Rep Article In a rapidly transforming world, farm data is growing exponentially. Realizing the importance of this data, researchers are looking for new solutions to analyse this data and make farming predictions. Artificial Intelligence, with its capacity to handle big data is rapidly becoming popular. In addition, it can also handle non-linear, noisy data and is not limited by the conditions required for conventional data analysis. This study was therefore undertaken to compare the most popular machine learning (ML) algorithms and rank them as per their ability to make predictions on sheep farm data spanning 11 years. Data was cleaned and prepared was done before analysis. Winsorization was done for outlier removal. Principal component analysis (PCA) and feature selection (FS) were done and based on that, three datasets were created viz. PCA (wherein only PCA was used), PCA+ FS (both techniques used for dimensionality reduction), and FS (only feature selection used) bodyweight prediction. Among the 11 ML algorithms that were evaluated, the correlations between true and predicted values for MARS algorithm, Bayesian ridge regression, Ridge regression, Support Vector Machines, Gradient boosting algorithm, Random forests, XgBoost algorithm, Artificial neural networks, Classification and regression trees, Polynomial regression, K nearest neighbours and Genetic Algorithms were 0.993, 0.992, 0.991, 0.991, 0.991, 0.99, 0.99, 0.984, 0.984, 0.957, 0.949, 0.734 respectively for bodyweights. The top five algorithms for the prediction of bodyweights, were MARS, Bayesian ridge regression, Ridge regression, Support Vector Machines and Gradient boosting algorithm. A total of 12 machine learning models were developed for the prediction of bodyweights in sheep in the present study. It may be said that machine learning techniques can perform predictions with reasonable accuracies and can thus help in drawing inferences and making futuristic predictions on farms for their economic prosperity, performance improvement and subsequently food security. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10427635/ /pubmed/37582936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40528-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hamadani, Ambreen
Ganai, Nazir Ahmad
Artificial intelligence algorithm comparison and ranking for weight prediction in sheep
title Artificial intelligence algorithm comparison and ranking for weight prediction in sheep
title_full Artificial intelligence algorithm comparison and ranking for weight prediction in sheep
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence algorithm comparison and ranking for weight prediction in sheep
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence algorithm comparison and ranking for weight prediction in sheep
title_short Artificial intelligence algorithm comparison and ranking for weight prediction in sheep
title_sort artificial intelligence algorithm comparison and ranking for weight prediction in sheep
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37582936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40528-4
work_keys_str_mv AT hamadaniambreen artificialintelligencealgorithmcomparisonandrankingforweightpredictioninsheep
AT ganainazirahmad artificialintelligencealgorithmcomparisonandrankingforweightpredictioninsheep