Cargando…

Comparison of the value of the STOP-BANG questionnaire with oxygen desaturation index in screening obstructive sleep apnea in Germany

PURPOSE: Despite polysomnography being the gold standard method of diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), it is time-consuming and has long waiting lists. Alternative methods including questionnaires and portable sleep devices have been developed to increase the speed of diagnosis. However, most...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yan, Fietze, Ingo, Salanitro, Matthew, Penzel, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36269514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-022-02727-7
_version_ 1785090300882976768
author Wang, Yan
Fietze, Ingo
Salanitro, Matthew
Penzel, Thomas
author_facet Wang, Yan
Fietze, Ingo
Salanitro, Matthew
Penzel, Thomas
author_sort Wang, Yan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Despite polysomnography being the gold standard method of diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), it is time-consuming and has long waiting lists. Alternative methods including questionnaires and portable sleep devices have been developed to increase the speed of diagnosis. However, most questionnaires such as the STOP-BANG questionnaire (SBQ) are limited due to low specificity. This study evaluated the value of SBQ to screen for OSA and compared it with the oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and their combination. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who completed the SBQ and underwent a night at the sleep lab or home sleep testing. The ODI was extracted from these sleep study reports. The combination of SBQ with ODI and their individual scores were compared with apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) in terms of their accuracy in diagnosing OSA. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for different severities of OSA were calculated and compared. RESULTS: Among 132 patients, SBQ showed a sensitivity of 0.9 and a specificity of 0.3 to screen for OSA. As the severity of OSA increased, the sensitivity increased whilst specificity decreased for both measurements. ODI achieved an increased specificity of 0.8 and could correctly diagnose OSA 86% of the time which was better than SBQ’s 60%. For all severities of OSA, ODI alone displayed a larger AUC than SBQ and similar AUC to their combination. CONCLUSION: ODI produced a higher specificity and AUC than SBQ. Furthermore, ODI combined with SBQ failed to increase diagnostic value. Therefore, ODI may be the preferred way to initially screen patients for OSA as an easy-to-use alternative compared to SBQ.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10427704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104277042023-08-17 Comparison of the value of the STOP-BANG questionnaire with oxygen desaturation index in screening obstructive sleep apnea in Germany Wang, Yan Fietze, Ingo Salanitro, Matthew Penzel, Thomas Sleep Breath Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article PURPOSE: Despite polysomnography being the gold standard method of diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), it is time-consuming and has long waiting lists. Alternative methods including questionnaires and portable sleep devices have been developed to increase the speed of diagnosis. However, most questionnaires such as the STOP-BANG questionnaire (SBQ) are limited due to low specificity. This study evaluated the value of SBQ to screen for OSA and compared it with the oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and their combination. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who completed the SBQ and underwent a night at the sleep lab or home sleep testing. The ODI was extracted from these sleep study reports. The combination of SBQ with ODI and their individual scores were compared with apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) in terms of their accuracy in diagnosing OSA. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for different severities of OSA were calculated and compared. RESULTS: Among 132 patients, SBQ showed a sensitivity of 0.9 and a specificity of 0.3 to screen for OSA. As the severity of OSA increased, the sensitivity increased whilst specificity decreased for both measurements. ODI achieved an increased specificity of 0.8 and could correctly diagnose OSA 86% of the time which was better than SBQ’s 60%. For all severities of OSA, ODI alone displayed a larger AUC than SBQ and similar AUC to their combination. CONCLUSION: ODI produced a higher specificity and AUC than SBQ. Furthermore, ODI combined with SBQ failed to increase diagnostic value. Therefore, ODI may be the preferred way to initially screen patients for OSA as an easy-to-use alternative compared to SBQ. Springer International Publishing 2022-10-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10427704/ /pubmed/36269514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-022-02727-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article
Wang, Yan
Fietze, Ingo
Salanitro, Matthew
Penzel, Thomas
Comparison of the value of the STOP-BANG questionnaire with oxygen desaturation index in screening obstructive sleep apnea in Germany
title Comparison of the value of the STOP-BANG questionnaire with oxygen desaturation index in screening obstructive sleep apnea in Germany
title_full Comparison of the value of the STOP-BANG questionnaire with oxygen desaturation index in screening obstructive sleep apnea in Germany
title_fullStr Comparison of the value of the STOP-BANG questionnaire with oxygen desaturation index in screening obstructive sleep apnea in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the value of the STOP-BANG questionnaire with oxygen desaturation index in screening obstructive sleep apnea in Germany
title_short Comparison of the value of the STOP-BANG questionnaire with oxygen desaturation index in screening obstructive sleep apnea in Germany
title_sort comparison of the value of the stop-bang questionnaire with oxygen desaturation index in screening obstructive sleep apnea in germany
topic Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36269514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-022-02727-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyan comparisonofthevalueofthestopbangquestionnairewithoxygendesaturationindexinscreeningobstructivesleepapneaingermany
AT fietzeingo comparisonofthevalueofthestopbangquestionnairewithoxygendesaturationindexinscreeningobstructivesleepapneaingermany
AT salanitromatthew comparisonofthevalueofthestopbangquestionnairewithoxygendesaturationindexinscreeningobstructivesleepapneaingermany
AT penzelthomas comparisonofthevalueofthestopbangquestionnairewithoxygendesaturationindexinscreeningobstructivesleepapneaingermany