Cargando…
Multifunctional redundancy: Impossible or undetected?
The diversity‐functioning relationship is a pillar of ecology. Two significant concepts have emerged from this relationship: redundancy, the asymptotic relationship between diversity and functioning, and multifunctionality, a monotonic relationship between diversity and multiple functions occurring...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37593757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10409 |
_version_ | 1785090345832284160 |
---|---|
author | White, Bridget E. Hovenden, Mark J. Barmuta, Leon A. |
author_facet | White, Bridget E. Hovenden, Mark J. Barmuta, Leon A. |
author_sort | White, Bridget E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The diversity‐functioning relationship is a pillar of ecology. Two significant concepts have emerged from this relationship: redundancy, the asymptotic relationship between diversity and functioning, and multifunctionality, a monotonic relationship between diversity and multiple functions occurring simultaneously. However, multifunctional redundancy, an asymptotic relationship between diversity and multiple functions occurring simultaneously, is rarely detected in research. Here we assess whether this lack of detection is due to its true rarity, or due to systematic research error. We discuss how inconsistencies in the use of terms such as ‘function’ lead to mismatched research. We consider the different techniques used to calculate multifunctionality and point out a rarely considered issue: how determining a function's maximum rate affects multifunctionality metrics. Lastly, we critique how a lack of consideration of multitrophic, spatiotemporal, interactions and community assembly processes in designed experiments significantly reduces the likelihood of detecting multifunctional redundancy. Multifunctionality research up to this stage has made significant contributions to our understanding of the diversity‐functioning relationship, and we believe that multifunctional redundancy is detectable with the use of appropriate methodologies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10427898 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104278982023-08-17 Multifunctional redundancy: Impossible or undetected? White, Bridget E. Hovenden, Mark J. Barmuta, Leon A. Ecol Evol Review Articles The diversity‐functioning relationship is a pillar of ecology. Two significant concepts have emerged from this relationship: redundancy, the asymptotic relationship between diversity and functioning, and multifunctionality, a monotonic relationship between diversity and multiple functions occurring simultaneously. However, multifunctional redundancy, an asymptotic relationship between diversity and multiple functions occurring simultaneously, is rarely detected in research. Here we assess whether this lack of detection is due to its true rarity, or due to systematic research error. We discuss how inconsistencies in the use of terms such as ‘function’ lead to mismatched research. We consider the different techniques used to calculate multifunctionality and point out a rarely considered issue: how determining a function's maximum rate affects multifunctionality metrics. Lastly, we critique how a lack of consideration of multitrophic, spatiotemporal, interactions and community assembly processes in designed experiments significantly reduces the likelihood of detecting multifunctional redundancy. Multifunctionality research up to this stage has made significant contributions to our understanding of the diversity‐functioning relationship, and we believe that multifunctional redundancy is detectable with the use of appropriate methodologies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10427898/ /pubmed/37593757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10409 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles White, Bridget E. Hovenden, Mark J. Barmuta, Leon A. Multifunctional redundancy: Impossible or undetected? |
title | Multifunctional redundancy: Impossible or undetected? |
title_full | Multifunctional redundancy: Impossible or undetected? |
title_fullStr | Multifunctional redundancy: Impossible or undetected? |
title_full_unstemmed | Multifunctional redundancy: Impossible or undetected? |
title_short | Multifunctional redundancy: Impossible or undetected? |
title_sort | multifunctional redundancy: impossible or undetected? |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37593757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10409 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whitebridgete multifunctionalredundancyimpossibleorundetected AT hovendenmarkj multifunctionalredundancyimpossibleorundetected AT barmutaleona multifunctionalredundancyimpossibleorundetected |