Cargando…

Effect of a smartphone intervention as a secondary prevention for university students with unhealthy alcohol use: randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effects of providing access to an alcohol intervention based on a smartphone. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Four higher education institutions in Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: 1770 students (≥18 years) who screened positive for unhealthy alcohol use (ie, a sco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertholet, Nicolas, Schmutz, Elodie, Studer, Joseph, Adam, Angéline, Gmel, Gerhard, Cunningham, John A, McNeely, Jennifer, Daeppen, Jean-Bernard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10428135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37586742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-073713
_version_ 1785090400110772224
author Bertholet, Nicolas
Schmutz, Elodie
Studer, Joseph
Adam, Angéline
Gmel, Gerhard
Cunningham, John A
McNeely, Jennifer
Daeppen, Jean-Bernard
author_facet Bertholet, Nicolas
Schmutz, Elodie
Studer, Joseph
Adam, Angéline
Gmel, Gerhard
Cunningham, John A
McNeely, Jennifer
Daeppen, Jean-Bernard
author_sort Bertholet, Nicolas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effects of providing access to an alcohol intervention based on a smartphone. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Four higher education institutions in Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: 1770 students (≥18 years) who screened positive for unhealthy alcohol use (ie, a score on the alcohol use disorders identification test-consumption (AUDIT-C) of ≥4 for men and ≥3 for women) were randomly assigned by 1:1 allocation ratio in blocks of 10. INTERVENTION: Providing access to a brief, smartphone based alcohol intervention. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome studied was number of standard drinks per week at six months and the secondary outcome was number of heavy drinking days (past 30 days). Additional outcomes were maximum number of drinks consumed on one occasion, alcohol related consequences, and academic performance. Follow-up assessments occurred at months three, six, and 12. Data were analysed by intention to treat and by using generalised linear mixed models with random intercepts for the recruitment site and participants nested within the recruitment site, and with intervention (v control), time (three months v six months; 12 months v six months), and baseline outcome values as fixed effects. RESULTS: The study was conducted between 26 April 2021 and 30 May 2022, and 1770 participants (intervention group (n=884); control group (n=886)) were included. Mean age was 22.4 years (standard deviation 3.07); 958 (54.1%) were women; and 1169 (66.0%) were undergraduate students, 533 (30.1%) were studying for a master’s degree, 43 (2.4%) were studying for a doctorate, and 25 (1.4%) were students of other higher education programme. The baseline mean number of standard drinks per week was 8.59 (standard deviation 8.18); the baseline number of heavy drinking days was 3.53 (4.02). Of 1770 participants, follow-up rates were 1706 (96.4%) at three months, 1697 (95.9%) at six months, and 1660 (93.8%) at 12 months. Of 884 students randomly assigned to the intervention group, 738 (83.5%) downloaded the smartphone application. The intervention had a significant overall effect on the number of standard drinks per week (incidence rate ratio 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.85 to 0.96)), heavy drinking days (0.89 (0.83 to 0.96)), and the maximum number of drinks consumed on one occasion (0.96 (0.93 to 1.00), P=0.029), indicating significantly lower drinking outcomes in the intervention group than in the control group during the follow-up period. The intervention did not affect alcohol related consequences or academic performance. CONCLUSION: Providing access to the smartphone application throughout the 12 month follow-up was effective at reducing the average drinking volume of university students who had self-reported unhealthy alcohol use at baseline. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 10007691.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10428135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104281352023-08-17 Effect of a smartphone intervention as a secondary prevention for university students with unhealthy alcohol use: randomised controlled trial Bertholet, Nicolas Schmutz, Elodie Studer, Joseph Adam, Angéline Gmel, Gerhard Cunningham, John A McNeely, Jennifer Daeppen, Jean-Bernard BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effects of providing access to an alcohol intervention based on a smartphone. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Four higher education institutions in Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: 1770 students (≥18 years) who screened positive for unhealthy alcohol use (ie, a score on the alcohol use disorders identification test-consumption (AUDIT-C) of ≥4 for men and ≥3 for women) were randomly assigned by 1:1 allocation ratio in blocks of 10. INTERVENTION: Providing access to a brief, smartphone based alcohol intervention. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome studied was number of standard drinks per week at six months and the secondary outcome was number of heavy drinking days (past 30 days). Additional outcomes were maximum number of drinks consumed on one occasion, alcohol related consequences, and academic performance. Follow-up assessments occurred at months three, six, and 12. Data were analysed by intention to treat and by using generalised linear mixed models with random intercepts for the recruitment site and participants nested within the recruitment site, and with intervention (v control), time (three months v six months; 12 months v six months), and baseline outcome values as fixed effects. RESULTS: The study was conducted between 26 April 2021 and 30 May 2022, and 1770 participants (intervention group (n=884); control group (n=886)) were included. Mean age was 22.4 years (standard deviation 3.07); 958 (54.1%) were women; and 1169 (66.0%) were undergraduate students, 533 (30.1%) were studying for a master’s degree, 43 (2.4%) were studying for a doctorate, and 25 (1.4%) were students of other higher education programme. The baseline mean number of standard drinks per week was 8.59 (standard deviation 8.18); the baseline number of heavy drinking days was 3.53 (4.02). Of 1770 participants, follow-up rates were 1706 (96.4%) at three months, 1697 (95.9%) at six months, and 1660 (93.8%) at 12 months. Of 884 students randomly assigned to the intervention group, 738 (83.5%) downloaded the smartphone application. The intervention had a significant overall effect on the number of standard drinks per week (incidence rate ratio 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.85 to 0.96)), heavy drinking days (0.89 (0.83 to 0.96)), and the maximum number of drinks consumed on one occasion (0.96 (0.93 to 1.00), P=0.029), indicating significantly lower drinking outcomes in the intervention group than in the control group during the follow-up period. The intervention did not affect alcohol related consequences or academic performance. CONCLUSION: Providing access to the smartphone application throughout the 12 month follow-up was effective at reducing the average drinking volume of university students who had self-reported unhealthy alcohol use at baseline. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 10007691. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2023-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10428135/ /pubmed/37586742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-073713 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Bertholet, Nicolas
Schmutz, Elodie
Studer, Joseph
Adam, Angéline
Gmel, Gerhard
Cunningham, John A
McNeely, Jennifer
Daeppen, Jean-Bernard
Effect of a smartphone intervention as a secondary prevention for university students with unhealthy alcohol use: randomised controlled trial
title Effect of a smartphone intervention as a secondary prevention for university students with unhealthy alcohol use: randomised controlled trial
title_full Effect of a smartphone intervention as a secondary prevention for university students with unhealthy alcohol use: randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effect of a smartphone intervention as a secondary prevention for university students with unhealthy alcohol use: randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of a smartphone intervention as a secondary prevention for university students with unhealthy alcohol use: randomised controlled trial
title_short Effect of a smartphone intervention as a secondary prevention for university students with unhealthy alcohol use: randomised controlled trial
title_sort effect of a smartphone intervention as a secondary prevention for university students with unhealthy alcohol use: randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10428135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37586742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-073713
work_keys_str_mv AT bertholetnicolas effectofasmartphoneinterventionasasecondarypreventionforuniversitystudentswithunhealthyalcoholuserandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schmutzelodie effectofasmartphoneinterventionasasecondarypreventionforuniversitystudentswithunhealthyalcoholuserandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT studerjoseph effectofasmartphoneinterventionasasecondarypreventionforuniversitystudentswithunhealthyalcoholuserandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT adamangeline effectofasmartphoneinterventionasasecondarypreventionforuniversitystudentswithunhealthyalcoholuserandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gmelgerhard effectofasmartphoneinterventionasasecondarypreventionforuniversitystudentswithunhealthyalcoholuserandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cunninghamjohna effectofasmartphoneinterventionasasecondarypreventionforuniversitystudentswithunhealthyalcoholuserandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mcneelyjennifer effectofasmartphoneinterventionasasecondarypreventionforuniversitystudentswithunhealthyalcoholuserandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT daeppenjeanbernard effectofasmartphoneinterventionasasecondarypreventionforuniversitystudentswithunhealthyalcoholuserandomisedcontrolledtrial