Cargando…

Postoperative recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer: how does neoadjuvant treatment affect recurrence pattern?

BACKGROUND: The treatment strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has recently expanded from total mesorectal excision to additional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and/or systemic chemotherapy (NAC). Data on disease recurrence after each treatment strategy are limited. METHODS: Clin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okamura, Ryosuke, Itatani, Yoshiro, Fujita, Yusuke, Hoshino, Nobuaki, Okumura, Shintaro, Nishiyama, Kazuhiro, Hida, Koya, Obama, Kazutaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10428603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37587422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03136-0
_version_ 1785090510057111552
author Okamura, Ryosuke
Itatani, Yoshiro
Fujita, Yusuke
Hoshino, Nobuaki
Okumura, Shintaro
Nishiyama, Kazuhiro
Hida, Koya
Obama, Kazutaka
author_facet Okamura, Ryosuke
Itatani, Yoshiro
Fujita, Yusuke
Hoshino, Nobuaki
Okumura, Shintaro
Nishiyama, Kazuhiro
Hida, Koya
Obama, Kazutaka
author_sort Okamura, Ryosuke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The treatment strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has recently expanded from total mesorectal excision to additional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and/or systemic chemotherapy (NAC). Data on disease recurrence after each treatment strategy are limited. METHODS: Clinical stage II to III rectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgery between July 2005 and February 2021 were analyzed. The cumulative incidence and site of first recurrence were assessed. The median follow-up duration was 4.6 years. RESULTS: Among the 332 patients, we performed nCRT and NAC in 15.4% (N=51) and 14.8% (N=49), respectively. The overall recurrence rate was 23.5% (N=78). Although several differences in tumor stage or location were observed, there was no significant difference in the rate among the surgery alone (N=54, 23.3%), nCRT (N=11, 21.6%), and NAC (N=13, 26.5%) groups. In this cohort, the local recurrence rate (18.4%) was higher than the rate of distant metastasis in the NAC group (14.3%). All patients with recurrence in the nCRT group had distant metastases (N=11: one patient had distant and local recurrences simultaneously). For pathological stage 0-I, the recurrence rate was higher in the nCRT and NAC groups than in the surgery-alone group (nCRT, 10.0%; NAC, 15.4%; and surgery-alone, 2.0%). Curative-intent resection of distant-only recurrences significantly improved patients’ overall survival (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.34 [0.14–0.84]), which was consistent even when stratified according to neoadjuvant treatment. Regardless of neoadjuvant treatment, >80% of recurrences occurred in the first 2.2 years, and 98.7% within 5 years after surgery. CONCLUSION: Regardless of neoadjuvant treatment, detecting distant metastases with intensive surveillance, particularly in the first 2 years after surgery, is important. Also, even if neoadjuvant treatment can downstage LARC to pathological stage 0-I, careful follow-up is needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-023-03136-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10428603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104286032023-08-17 Postoperative recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer: how does neoadjuvant treatment affect recurrence pattern? Okamura, Ryosuke Itatani, Yoshiro Fujita, Yusuke Hoshino, Nobuaki Okumura, Shintaro Nishiyama, Kazuhiro Hida, Koya Obama, Kazutaka World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The treatment strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has recently expanded from total mesorectal excision to additional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and/or systemic chemotherapy (NAC). Data on disease recurrence after each treatment strategy are limited. METHODS: Clinical stage II to III rectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgery between July 2005 and February 2021 were analyzed. The cumulative incidence and site of first recurrence were assessed. The median follow-up duration was 4.6 years. RESULTS: Among the 332 patients, we performed nCRT and NAC in 15.4% (N=51) and 14.8% (N=49), respectively. The overall recurrence rate was 23.5% (N=78). Although several differences in tumor stage or location were observed, there was no significant difference in the rate among the surgery alone (N=54, 23.3%), nCRT (N=11, 21.6%), and NAC (N=13, 26.5%) groups. In this cohort, the local recurrence rate (18.4%) was higher than the rate of distant metastasis in the NAC group (14.3%). All patients with recurrence in the nCRT group had distant metastases (N=11: one patient had distant and local recurrences simultaneously). For pathological stage 0-I, the recurrence rate was higher in the nCRT and NAC groups than in the surgery-alone group (nCRT, 10.0%; NAC, 15.4%; and surgery-alone, 2.0%). Curative-intent resection of distant-only recurrences significantly improved patients’ overall survival (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.34 [0.14–0.84]), which was consistent even when stratified according to neoadjuvant treatment. Regardless of neoadjuvant treatment, >80% of recurrences occurred in the first 2.2 years, and 98.7% within 5 years after surgery. CONCLUSION: Regardless of neoadjuvant treatment, detecting distant metastases with intensive surveillance, particularly in the first 2 years after surgery, is important. Also, even if neoadjuvant treatment can downstage LARC to pathological stage 0-I, careful follow-up is needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-023-03136-0. BioMed Central 2023-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10428603/ /pubmed/37587422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03136-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Okamura, Ryosuke
Itatani, Yoshiro
Fujita, Yusuke
Hoshino, Nobuaki
Okumura, Shintaro
Nishiyama, Kazuhiro
Hida, Koya
Obama, Kazutaka
Postoperative recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer: how does neoadjuvant treatment affect recurrence pattern?
title Postoperative recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer: how does neoadjuvant treatment affect recurrence pattern?
title_full Postoperative recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer: how does neoadjuvant treatment affect recurrence pattern?
title_fullStr Postoperative recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer: how does neoadjuvant treatment affect recurrence pattern?
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer: how does neoadjuvant treatment affect recurrence pattern?
title_short Postoperative recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer: how does neoadjuvant treatment affect recurrence pattern?
title_sort postoperative recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer: how does neoadjuvant treatment affect recurrence pattern?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10428603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37587422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03136-0
work_keys_str_mv AT okamuraryosuke postoperativerecurrenceinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerhowdoesneoadjuvanttreatmentaffectrecurrencepattern
AT itataniyoshiro postoperativerecurrenceinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerhowdoesneoadjuvanttreatmentaffectrecurrencepattern
AT fujitayusuke postoperativerecurrenceinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerhowdoesneoadjuvanttreatmentaffectrecurrencepattern
AT hoshinonobuaki postoperativerecurrenceinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerhowdoesneoadjuvanttreatmentaffectrecurrencepattern
AT okumurashintaro postoperativerecurrenceinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerhowdoesneoadjuvanttreatmentaffectrecurrencepattern
AT nishiyamakazuhiro postoperativerecurrenceinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerhowdoesneoadjuvanttreatmentaffectrecurrencepattern
AT hidakoya postoperativerecurrenceinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerhowdoesneoadjuvanttreatmentaffectrecurrencepattern
AT obamakazutaka postoperativerecurrenceinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerhowdoesneoadjuvanttreatmentaffectrecurrencepattern