Effect of Lutein on Ocular Goblet Cell, IFN-γ, and IL-17 Concentration in Dry Eye-Induced Mice Model

Introduction Dry eye disease affects a substantial number of individuals globally and significantly impacts their quality of life and productivity. Understanding the underlying mechanisms and managing dry eye disease poses substantial challenges. Recent research has highlighted the involvement of various inflammatory mediators in the pathogenesis of dry eye disease, including the cytokines interferon (IFN)-γ and interleukin (IL)-17. Activation of stress signaling pathways and residential immune cells on the ocular epithelial surface ignites epithelial changes, destabilizes tear film, amplifies inflammation and creates an endless loop. Lutein is a β-carotenoid antioxidant which has been proven to be beneficial in many ocular diseases due to its protective and anti-inflammatory effect induced by various stimulators. Lutein also acts as a direct and indirect antioxidant agent, suppressing oxidative stress and mitigating oxidative damage. The purpose of this research is to investigate the potential therapeutic effects of lutein in a mouse model of dry eye, aiming to elucidate its impact on ocular manifestation, goblet cells count, IFN-γ and IL-17 level. Methods Desiccating stress was induced in C57BL/6 mice. In a separate group, lutein was administered subcutaneously on a daily basis throughout the experimental period. Clinical manifestations of dry eye, including ocular surface changes, were documented photographically. Goblet cell concentration was assessed through Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) staining, and the levels of IFN-γ and IL-17 were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Data obtained from these assessments were compared between the experimental groups to determine the potential effects of lutein on dry eye pathology and cytokine levels. Results Significant differences were observed in clinical observations and goblet cell concentrations among the groups; however, no statistically significant differences were found in the levels of IFN-γ and IL-17 between the groups. The untreated group exhibited significantly higher opacities and irregularities compared to the lutein-treated group, whereas the mean goblet cell count was highest in the lutein-treated group. Conclusion Lutein administration improves clinical observations and goblet cell concentrations in a mouse model of dry eye. The treated group exhibited improved ocular surface integrity, but no significant differences in the tested cytokine levels were observed. These findings suggest that lutein supplementation could be a promising therapeutic option for managing dry eye disease. Further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and long-term effects of lutein in dry eye management.