Cargando…
Wearables alone will not eliminate failure to rescue
Surveys suggest that anaesthesiologists believe that continuous monitoring with wearables will lead to improved patient outcomes. However, evidence suggests that several critical factors, including timely recognition of physiological problems, the presence of a trained team to respond to the alerts,...
Autores principales: | Wiener-Kronish, Jeanine P., Bonnici, Timothy |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10430867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjao.2022.100009 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Acute Pneumonia
por: Dotson, Rachel H., et al.
Publicado: (2007) -
Remote Surveillance Technologies: Realizing the Aim of Right Patient, Right Data, Right Time
por: Safavi, Kyan C., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Association between Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion, antibiotic resistance, and clinical outcome: a review
por: Sawa, Teiji, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
A Remote Surveillance Platform to Monitor General Care Ward Surgical Patients for Acute Physiologic Deterioration
por: Safavi, Kyan C., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
“Failure to Rescue”: An Imperfect Measure Well Suited to Complement an Imperfect World
por: Holzer, Ralf J.
Publicado: (2019)