Cargando…

Socket shield technique: Stress distribution analysis

BACKGROUND: To analyze through finite element analysis the stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissues, implants, and prosthetic components induced by the socket shield (SS) technique in comparison to other techniques used to treat tooth loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-dimensional model of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neves, Ricardo Guimarães, Lazari-Carvalho, Priscilla Cardoso, Carvalho, Marco Aurélio, Carvalho, Alexandre Leite, de Souza, João Batista, Torres, Érica Miranda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10431233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37593548
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_356_22
_version_ 1785091152696836096
author Neves, Ricardo Guimarães
Lazari-Carvalho, Priscilla Cardoso
Carvalho, Marco Aurélio
Carvalho, Alexandre Leite
de Souza, João Batista
Torres, Érica Miranda
author_facet Neves, Ricardo Guimarães
Lazari-Carvalho, Priscilla Cardoso
Carvalho, Marco Aurélio
Carvalho, Alexandre Leite
de Souza, João Batista
Torres, Érica Miranda
author_sort Neves, Ricardo Guimarães
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To analyze through finite element analysis the stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissues, implants, and prosthetic components induced by the socket shield (SS) technique in comparison to other techniques used to treat tooth loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-dimensional model of a superior central incisor crown supported by implant was modeled and three different placement conditions were simulated: SS – 2.0-mm-thick root dentin fragment positioned between the alveolar buccal wall and implant; heterologous bone graft (HBG) – bovine bone graft positioned the alveolar buccal wall and implant; and control (C) – implant fully placed in bone tissue of a healed alveolus. The model was restricted at the lateral surfaces of the bone tissue and the following loads were simulated: Both oblique (45°) loads of 100 N on the lingual surface of the crown (maximal habitual intercuspation) and 25.5 N on the incisal edge of the crown (tooth contact during mandibular protrusion) were simultaneously applied. Tensile stress, shear stress, compression, and displacement were analyzed in the cortical bone, trabecular bone, dentin root fragment, and bone graft; while equivalent von Mises stresses were quantified in the implant and prosthetic components. RESULTS: Stress values of SS and HBG in the bone tissues were higher than C, while slight differences within models were observed for dentin root fragment, bone graft, implant, and prosthetic components. CONCLUSIONS: The SS technique presented the highest stress concentration in the peri-implant tissues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10431233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104312332023-08-17 Socket shield technique: Stress distribution analysis Neves, Ricardo Guimarães Lazari-Carvalho, Priscilla Cardoso Carvalho, Marco Aurélio Carvalho, Alexandre Leite de Souza, João Batista Torres, Érica Miranda J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article BACKGROUND: To analyze through finite element analysis the stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissues, implants, and prosthetic components induced by the socket shield (SS) technique in comparison to other techniques used to treat tooth loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-dimensional model of a superior central incisor crown supported by implant was modeled and three different placement conditions were simulated: SS – 2.0-mm-thick root dentin fragment positioned between the alveolar buccal wall and implant; heterologous bone graft (HBG) – bovine bone graft positioned the alveolar buccal wall and implant; and control (C) – implant fully placed in bone tissue of a healed alveolus. The model was restricted at the lateral surfaces of the bone tissue and the following loads were simulated: Both oblique (45°) loads of 100 N on the lingual surface of the crown (maximal habitual intercuspation) and 25.5 N on the incisal edge of the crown (tooth contact during mandibular protrusion) were simultaneously applied. Tensile stress, shear stress, compression, and displacement were analyzed in the cortical bone, trabecular bone, dentin root fragment, and bone graft; while equivalent von Mises stresses were quantified in the implant and prosthetic components. RESULTS: Stress values of SS and HBG in the bone tissues were higher than C, while slight differences within models were observed for dentin root fragment, bone graft, implant, and prosthetic components. CONCLUSIONS: The SS technique presented the highest stress concentration in the peri-implant tissues. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10431233/ /pubmed/37593548 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_356_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Indian Society of Periodontology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Neves, Ricardo Guimarães
Lazari-Carvalho, Priscilla Cardoso
Carvalho, Marco Aurélio
Carvalho, Alexandre Leite
de Souza, João Batista
Torres, Érica Miranda
Socket shield technique: Stress distribution analysis
title Socket shield technique: Stress distribution analysis
title_full Socket shield technique: Stress distribution analysis
title_fullStr Socket shield technique: Stress distribution analysis
title_full_unstemmed Socket shield technique: Stress distribution analysis
title_short Socket shield technique: Stress distribution analysis
title_sort socket shield technique: stress distribution analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10431233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37593548
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_356_22
work_keys_str_mv AT nevesricardoguimaraes socketshieldtechniquestressdistributionanalysis
AT lazaricarvalhopriscillacardoso socketshieldtechniquestressdistributionanalysis
AT carvalhomarcoaurelio socketshieldtechniquestressdistributionanalysis
AT carvalhoalexandreleite socketshieldtechniquestressdistributionanalysis
AT desouzajoaobatista socketshieldtechniquestressdistributionanalysis
AT torresericamiranda socketshieldtechniquestressdistributionanalysis