Cargando…
Socket shield technique: Stress distribution analysis
BACKGROUND: To analyze through finite element analysis the stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissues, implants, and prosthetic components induced by the socket shield (SS) technique in comparison to other techniques used to treat tooth loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-dimensional model of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10431233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37593548 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_356_22 |
_version_ | 1785091152696836096 |
---|---|
author | Neves, Ricardo Guimarães Lazari-Carvalho, Priscilla Cardoso Carvalho, Marco Aurélio Carvalho, Alexandre Leite de Souza, João Batista Torres, Érica Miranda |
author_facet | Neves, Ricardo Guimarães Lazari-Carvalho, Priscilla Cardoso Carvalho, Marco Aurélio Carvalho, Alexandre Leite de Souza, João Batista Torres, Érica Miranda |
author_sort | Neves, Ricardo Guimarães |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To analyze through finite element analysis the stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissues, implants, and prosthetic components induced by the socket shield (SS) technique in comparison to other techniques used to treat tooth loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-dimensional model of a superior central incisor crown supported by implant was modeled and three different placement conditions were simulated: SS – 2.0-mm-thick root dentin fragment positioned between the alveolar buccal wall and implant; heterologous bone graft (HBG) – bovine bone graft positioned the alveolar buccal wall and implant; and control (C) – implant fully placed in bone tissue of a healed alveolus. The model was restricted at the lateral surfaces of the bone tissue and the following loads were simulated: Both oblique (45°) loads of 100 N on the lingual surface of the crown (maximal habitual intercuspation) and 25.5 N on the incisal edge of the crown (tooth contact during mandibular protrusion) were simultaneously applied. Tensile stress, shear stress, compression, and displacement were analyzed in the cortical bone, trabecular bone, dentin root fragment, and bone graft; while equivalent von Mises stresses were quantified in the implant and prosthetic components. RESULTS: Stress values of SS and HBG in the bone tissues were higher than C, while slight differences within models were observed for dentin root fragment, bone graft, implant, and prosthetic components. CONCLUSIONS: The SS technique presented the highest stress concentration in the peri-implant tissues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10431233 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104312332023-08-17 Socket shield technique: Stress distribution analysis Neves, Ricardo Guimarães Lazari-Carvalho, Priscilla Cardoso Carvalho, Marco Aurélio Carvalho, Alexandre Leite de Souza, João Batista Torres, Érica Miranda J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article BACKGROUND: To analyze through finite element analysis the stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissues, implants, and prosthetic components induced by the socket shield (SS) technique in comparison to other techniques used to treat tooth loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-dimensional model of a superior central incisor crown supported by implant was modeled and three different placement conditions were simulated: SS – 2.0-mm-thick root dentin fragment positioned between the alveolar buccal wall and implant; heterologous bone graft (HBG) – bovine bone graft positioned the alveolar buccal wall and implant; and control (C) – implant fully placed in bone tissue of a healed alveolus. The model was restricted at the lateral surfaces of the bone tissue and the following loads were simulated: Both oblique (45°) loads of 100 N on the lingual surface of the crown (maximal habitual intercuspation) and 25.5 N on the incisal edge of the crown (tooth contact during mandibular protrusion) were simultaneously applied. Tensile stress, shear stress, compression, and displacement were analyzed in the cortical bone, trabecular bone, dentin root fragment, and bone graft; while equivalent von Mises stresses were quantified in the implant and prosthetic components. RESULTS: Stress values of SS and HBG in the bone tissues were higher than C, while slight differences within models were observed for dentin root fragment, bone graft, implant, and prosthetic components. CONCLUSIONS: The SS technique presented the highest stress concentration in the peri-implant tissues. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10431233/ /pubmed/37593548 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_356_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Indian Society of Periodontology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Neves, Ricardo Guimarães Lazari-Carvalho, Priscilla Cardoso Carvalho, Marco Aurélio Carvalho, Alexandre Leite de Souza, João Batista Torres, Érica Miranda Socket shield technique: Stress distribution analysis |
title | Socket shield technique: Stress distribution analysis |
title_full | Socket shield technique: Stress distribution analysis |
title_fullStr | Socket shield technique: Stress distribution analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Socket shield technique: Stress distribution analysis |
title_short | Socket shield technique: Stress distribution analysis |
title_sort | socket shield technique: stress distribution analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10431233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37593548 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_356_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nevesricardoguimaraes socketshieldtechniquestressdistributionanalysis AT lazaricarvalhopriscillacardoso socketshieldtechniquestressdistributionanalysis AT carvalhomarcoaurelio socketshieldtechniquestressdistributionanalysis AT carvalhoalexandreleite socketshieldtechniquestressdistributionanalysis AT desouzajoaobatista socketshieldtechniquestressdistributionanalysis AT torresericamiranda socketshieldtechniquestressdistributionanalysis |