Cargando…

Impact of beta-blockers on mortality and cardiovascular disease outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: a population-based cohort study in target trial emulation framework

BACKGROUND: There is no real-world evidence regarding the association between beta-blocker use and mortality or cardiovascular outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). We aimed to investigate the impact of beta-blocker use on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Anthony, Ju, Chengsheng, Mackenzie, Isla S., MacDonald, Thomas M., Struthers, Allan D., Wei, Li, Man, Kenneth K.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37601338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100715
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: There is no real-world evidence regarding the association between beta-blocker use and mortality or cardiovascular outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). We aimed to investigate the impact of beta-blocker use on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in patients with OSA. METHODS: We conducted a target trial emulation study of 37,581 patients with newly diagnosed OSA from 1st January 2000 to 30th November 2021 using the IMRD-UK database (formerly known as the THIN database). We compared the treatment strategies of initiating beta-blocker treatment within one year versus non-beta-blocker treatment through the method of clone-censor-weight. Covariates, including patients’ demographics, lifestyle, comorbidities, and recent medications, were measured and controlled. Patients were followed up for all-cause mortality or composite CVD outcomes (angina, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, heart failure, or atrial fibrillation). We estimated the five-year absolute risks, risk differences and risk ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with standardised, weighted pooled logistic regression, which is a discrete-time hazard model for survival analysis. Several sensitivity analyses were performed, including multiple imputation addressing the missing data. FINDINGS: The median follow-up time was 4.1 (interquartile range, 1.9–7.8) years. The five-year absolute risk of all-cause mortality and CVD outcomes were 4.9% (95% CI, 3.8–6.0) and 13.0% (95% CI, 11.4–15.0) among beta-blocker users, and 4.0% (95% CI, 3.8–4.2) and 9.4% (95% CI, 9.1–9.7) among non-beta-blocker users, respectively. The five-year absolute risk difference and risk ratio between the two groups for all-cause mortality and CVD outcomes were 0.9% (95% CI, −0.2 to 2.1) and 1.22 (95% CI, 0.96–1.54), and 3.5% (95% CI, 2.1–5.5) and 1.37 (95% CI, 1.22–1.62), respectively. Findings were consistent across the sensitivity analyses. INTERPRETATION: Beta-blocker treatment was associated with an increased risk of CVD and a trend for an increased risk of mortality among patients with OSA. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings. FUNDING: 10.13039/501100003452Innovation and Technology Commission of the Hong Kong Special Administration Region Government.