Cargando…

Pectopexy vs sacrocolpopexy: an analysis of 50 cases in a North American hospital

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pectopexy is an alternative to sacrocolpopexy that was first reported in 2010. This procedure has been performed at our hospital since 2019 in patients with contraindications to sacrocolpopexy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of 50 cases of pectopexy with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heusinkveld, John, Khandekar, Maithili, Winget, Veronica, Tigner, Alyssa, Addis, Ilana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100254
_version_ 1785091356608167936
author Heusinkveld, John
Khandekar, Maithili
Winget, Veronica
Tigner, Alyssa
Addis, Ilana
author_facet Heusinkveld, John
Khandekar, Maithili
Winget, Veronica
Tigner, Alyssa
Addis, Ilana
author_sort Heusinkveld, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pectopexy is an alternative to sacrocolpopexy that was first reported in 2010. This procedure has been performed at our hospital since 2019 in patients with contraindications to sacrocolpopexy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of 50 cases of pectopexy with historical outcomes data for sacrocolpopexy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of 50 laparoscopic pectopexies performed from July 2020 to July 2022 at an academic tertiary referral center; this was the second reported use of this technique in North America. The outcomes from laparoscopic pectopexy were compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy performed at the same institution by the same surgeons (n=207). The primary outcomes were complication rate, rate of recurrent prolapse (stage II or greater), and reoperation. RESULTS: Overall complication rates were 6.0% for pectopexy and 16.5% for sacrocolpopexy (relative risk, 0.79; P=.65). Recurrent prolapse was seen among 2.0% of patients who underwent pectopexy and 6.3% of patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy at most recent follow-up (relative risk, 1.27; P=.66). The rates of reoperation were 2.0% for pectopexy and 3.9% for sacrocolpopexy (relative risk, 1.04; P=.96). The average operative times were 138 minutes for pectopexy and 158 minutes for sacrocolpopexy. The average lengths of follow-up were 88.1 days for pectopexy and 325.5 for sacrocolpopexy. CONCLUSION: Although pectopexy was typically employed in patients with extensive pelvic adhesions or other conditions that placed them at higher risk of complications, both the success rate and the adverse event rate were similar to those in the historical cohort who underwent sacrocolpopexy. Although sacrocolpopexy remains the gold standard operation for apical prolapse, our data suggest that pectopexy can be employed to offer similar outcomes in many patients with contraindications to sacral fixation. These data give us increasing confidence that we can counsel our patients that this operation is likely to produce an outcome similar to a sacrocolpopexy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10432240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104322402023-08-18 Pectopexy vs sacrocolpopexy: an analysis of 50 cases in a North American hospital Heusinkveld, John Khandekar, Maithili Winget, Veronica Tigner, Alyssa Addis, Ilana AJOG Glob Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pectopexy is an alternative to sacrocolpopexy that was first reported in 2010. This procedure has been performed at our hospital since 2019 in patients with contraindications to sacrocolpopexy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of 50 cases of pectopexy with historical outcomes data for sacrocolpopexy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of 50 laparoscopic pectopexies performed from July 2020 to July 2022 at an academic tertiary referral center; this was the second reported use of this technique in North America. The outcomes from laparoscopic pectopexy were compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy performed at the same institution by the same surgeons (n=207). The primary outcomes were complication rate, rate of recurrent prolapse (stage II or greater), and reoperation. RESULTS: Overall complication rates were 6.0% for pectopexy and 16.5% for sacrocolpopexy (relative risk, 0.79; P=.65). Recurrent prolapse was seen among 2.0% of patients who underwent pectopexy and 6.3% of patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy at most recent follow-up (relative risk, 1.27; P=.66). The rates of reoperation were 2.0% for pectopexy and 3.9% for sacrocolpopexy (relative risk, 1.04; P=.96). The average operative times were 138 minutes for pectopexy and 158 minutes for sacrocolpopexy. The average lengths of follow-up were 88.1 days for pectopexy and 325.5 for sacrocolpopexy. CONCLUSION: Although pectopexy was typically employed in patients with extensive pelvic adhesions or other conditions that placed them at higher risk of complications, both the success rate and the adverse event rate were similar to those in the historical cohort who underwent sacrocolpopexy. Although sacrocolpopexy remains the gold standard operation for apical prolapse, our data suggest that pectopexy can be employed to offer similar outcomes in many patients with contraindications to sacral fixation. These data give us increasing confidence that we can counsel our patients that this operation is likely to produce an outcome similar to a sacrocolpopexy. Elsevier 2023-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10432240/ /pubmed/37600747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100254 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Heusinkveld, John
Khandekar, Maithili
Winget, Veronica
Tigner, Alyssa
Addis, Ilana
Pectopexy vs sacrocolpopexy: an analysis of 50 cases in a North American hospital
title Pectopexy vs sacrocolpopexy: an analysis of 50 cases in a North American hospital
title_full Pectopexy vs sacrocolpopexy: an analysis of 50 cases in a North American hospital
title_fullStr Pectopexy vs sacrocolpopexy: an analysis of 50 cases in a North American hospital
title_full_unstemmed Pectopexy vs sacrocolpopexy: an analysis of 50 cases in a North American hospital
title_short Pectopexy vs sacrocolpopexy: an analysis of 50 cases in a North American hospital
title_sort pectopexy vs sacrocolpopexy: an analysis of 50 cases in a north american hospital
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100254
work_keys_str_mv AT heusinkveldjohn pectopexyvssacrocolpopexyananalysisof50casesinanorthamericanhospital
AT khandekarmaithili pectopexyvssacrocolpopexyananalysisof50casesinanorthamericanhospital
AT wingetveronica pectopexyvssacrocolpopexyananalysisof50casesinanorthamericanhospital
AT tigneralyssa pectopexyvssacrocolpopexyananalysisof50casesinanorthamericanhospital
AT addisilana pectopexyvssacrocolpopexyananalysisof50casesinanorthamericanhospital