Cargando…
Pectopexy vs sacrocolpopexy: an analysis of 50 cases in a North American hospital
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pectopexy is an alternative to sacrocolpopexy that was first reported in 2010. This procedure has been performed at our hospital since 2019 in patients with contraindications to sacrocolpopexy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of 50 cases of pectopexy with...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100254 |
_version_ | 1785091356608167936 |
---|---|
author | Heusinkveld, John Khandekar, Maithili Winget, Veronica Tigner, Alyssa Addis, Ilana |
author_facet | Heusinkveld, John Khandekar, Maithili Winget, Veronica Tigner, Alyssa Addis, Ilana |
author_sort | Heusinkveld, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pectopexy is an alternative to sacrocolpopexy that was first reported in 2010. This procedure has been performed at our hospital since 2019 in patients with contraindications to sacrocolpopexy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of 50 cases of pectopexy with historical outcomes data for sacrocolpopexy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of 50 laparoscopic pectopexies performed from July 2020 to July 2022 at an academic tertiary referral center; this was the second reported use of this technique in North America. The outcomes from laparoscopic pectopexy were compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy performed at the same institution by the same surgeons (n=207). The primary outcomes were complication rate, rate of recurrent prolapse (stage II or greater), and reoperation. RESULTS: Overall complication rates were 6.0% for pectopexy and 16.5% for sacrocolpopexy (relative risk, 0.79; P=.65). Recurrent prolapse was seen among 2.0% of patients who underwent pectopexy and 6.3% of patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy at most recent follow-up (relative risk, 1.27; P=.66). The rates of reoperation were 2.0% for pectopexy and 3.9% for sacrocolpopexy (relative risk, 1.04; P=.96). The average operative times were 138 minutes for pectopexy and 158 minutes for sacrocolpopexy. The average lengths of follow-up were 88.1 days for pectopexy and 325.5 for sacrocolpopexy. CONCLUSION: Although pectopexy was typically employed in patients with extensive pelvic adhesions or other conditions that placed them at higher risk of complications, both the success rate and the adverse event rate were similar to those in the historical cohort who underwent sacrocolpopexy. Although sacrocolpopexy remains the gold standard operation for apical prolapse, our data suggest that pectopexy can be employed to offer similar outcomes in many patients with contraindications to sacral fixation. These data give us increasing confidence that we can counsel our patients that this operation is likely to produce an outcome similar to a sacrocolpopexy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10432240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104322402023-08-18 Pectopexy vs sacrocolpopexy: an analysis of 50 cases in a North American hospital Heusinkveld, John Khandekar, Maithili Winget, Veronica Tigner, Alyssa Addis, Ilana AJOG Glob Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pectopexy is an alternative to sacrocolpopexy that was first reported in 2010. This procedure has been performed at our hospital since 2019 in patients with contraindications to sacrocolpopexy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of 50 cases of pectopexy with historical outcomes data for sacrocolpopexy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of 50 laparoscopic pectopexies performed from July 2020 to July 2022 at an academic tertiary referral center; this was the second reported use of this technique in North America. The outcomes from laparoscopic pectopexy were compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy performed at the same institution by the same surgeons (n=207). The primary outcomes were complication rate, rate of recurrent prolapse (stage II or greater), and reoperation. RESULTS: Overall complication rates were 6.0% for pectopexy and 16.5% for sacrocolpopexy (relative risk, 0.79; P=.65). Recurrent prolapse was seen among 2.0% of patients who underwent pectopexy and 6.3% of patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy at most recent follow-up (relative risk, 1.27; P=.66). The rates of reoperation were 2.0% for pectopexy and 3.9% for sacrocolpopexy (relative risk, 1.04; P=.96). The average operative times were 138 minutes for pectopexy and 158 minutes for sacrocolpopexy. The average lengths of follow-up were 88.1 days for pectopexy and 325.5 for sacrocolpopexy. CONCLUSION: Although pectopexy was typically employed in patients with extensive pelvic adhesions or other conditions that placed them at higher risk of complications, both the success rate and the adverse event rate were similar to those in the historical cohort who underwent sacrocolpopexy. Although sacrocolpopexy remains the gold standard operation for apical prolapse, our data suggest that pectopexy can be employed to offer similar outcomes in many patients with contraindications to sacral fixation. These data give us increasing confidence that we can counsel our patients that this operation is likely to produce an outcome similar to a sacrocolpopexy. Elsevier 2023-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10432240/ /pubmed/37600747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100254 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Heusinkveld, John Khandekar, Maithili Winget, Veronica Tigner, Alyssa Addis, Ilana Pectopexy vs sacrocolpopexy: an analysis of 50 cases in a North American hospital |
title | Pectopexy vs sacrocolpopexy: an analysis of 50 cases in a North American hospital |
title_full | Pectopexy vs sacrocolpopexy: an analysis of 50 cases in a North American hospital |
title_fullStr | Pectopexy vs sacrocolpopexy: an analysis of 50 cases in a North American hospital |
title_full_unstemmed | Pectopexy vs sacrocolpopexy: an analysis of 50 cases in a North American hospital |
title_short | Pectopexy vs sacrocolpopexy: an analysis of 50 cases in a North American hospital |
title_sort | pectopexy vs sacrocolpopexy: an analysis of 50 cases in a north american hospital |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100254 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heusinkveldjohn pectopexyvssacrocolpopexyananalysisof50casesinanorthamericanhospital AT khandekarmaithili pectopexyvssacrocolpopexyananalysisof50casesinanorthamericanhospital AT wingetveronica pectopexyvssacrocolpopexyananalysisof50casesinanorthamericanhospital AT tigneralyssa pectopexyvssacrocolpopexyananalysisof50casesinanorthamericanhospital AT addisilana pectopexyvssacrocolpopexyananalysisof50casesinanorthamericanhospital |