Cargando…

Effect of the arrangement of cavitation generation unit on the performance of an advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor

Hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) is widely considered a promising process intensification technology. The novel advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactors (ARHCRs), with considerably higher performance compared with traditional devices, have gained increasing attention of academic and industri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Xun, Xia, Gaoju, You, Weibin, Jia, Xiaoqi, Manickam, Sivakumar, Tao, Yang, Zhao, Shan, Yoon, Joon Yong, Xuan, Xiaoxu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37544171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106544
_version_ 1785091358395990016
author Sun, Xun
Xia, Gaoju
You, Weibin
Jia, Xiaoqi
Manickam, Sivakumar
Tao, Yang
Zhao, Shan
Yoon, Joon Yong
Xuan, Xiaoxu
author_facet Sun, Xun
Xia, Gaoju
You, Weibin
Jia, Xiaoqi
Manickam, Sivakumar
Tao, Yang
Zhao, Shan
Yoon, Joon Yong
Xuan, Xiaoxu
author_sort Sun, Xun
collection PubMed
description Hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) is widely considered a promising process intensification technology. The novel advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactors (ARHCRs), with considerably higher performance compared with traditional devices, have gained increasing attention of academic and industrial communities. The cavitation generation unit (CGU), located on the rotor and/or stator of an ARHCR, is utilized to generate cavitation and consequently, its geometrical structure is vital for the performance. The present work studied, for the first time, the effect of the arrangement of CGU on the performance of a representative ARHCR by employing computational fluid dynamics based on the “simplified flow field” strategy. The effect of CGU arrangement, which was neglected in the past, was evaluated: radial offset distance (c), intersection angle (ω), number of rows (N), circumferential offset angle (γ), and radial spacing (r). The results indicate that the CGU, with an arrangement of a low ω and moderate c, N, γ, and r, performed the highest cavitation efficiency. The corresponding reasons were analyzed by combining the flow field and cavitation pattern. Moreover, the results also exposed a weakness of the “simplified flow field” strategy which may induce the unfavorable “sidewall effect” and cause false high-pressure region. The findings of this work may provide a reference value to the design of ARHCRs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10432248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104322482023-08-18 Effect of the arrangement of cavitation generation unit on the performance of an advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor Sun, Xun Xia, Gaoju You, Weibin Jia, Xiaoqi Manickam, Sivakumar Tao, Yang Zhao, Shan Yoon, Joon Yong Xuan, Xiaoxu Ultrason Sonochem Original Research Article Hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) is widely considered a promising process intensification technology. The novel advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactors (ARHCRs), with considerably higher performance compared with traditional devices, have gained increasing attention of academic and industrial communities. The cavitation generation unit (CGU), located on the rotor and/or stator of an ARHCR, is utilized to generate cavitation and consequently, its geometrical structure is vital for the performance. The present work studied, for the first time, the effect of the arrangement of CGU on the performance of a representative ARHCR by employing computational fluid dynamics based on the “simplified flow field” strategy. The effect of CGU arrangement, which was neglected in the past, was evaluated: radial offset distance (c), intersection angle (ω), number of rows (N), circumferential offset angle (γ), and radial spacing (r). The results indicate that the CGU, with an arrangement of a low ω and moderate c, N, γ, and r, performed the highest cavitation efficiency. The corresponding reasons were analyzed by combining the flow field and cavitation pattern. Moreover, the results also exposed a weakness of the “simplified flow field” strategy which may induce the unfavorable “sidewall effect” and cause false high-pressure region. The findings of this work may provide a reference value to the design of ARHCRs. Elsevier 2023-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10432248/ /pubmed/37544171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106544 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Sun, Xun
Xia, Gaoju
You, Weibin
Jia, Xiaoqi
Manickam, Sivakumar
Tao, Yang
Zhao, Shan
Yoon, Joon Yong
Xuan, Xiaoxu
Effect of the arrangement of cavitation generation unit on the performance of an advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor
title Effect of the arrangement of cavitation generation unit on the performance of an advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor
title_full Effect of the arrangement of cavitation generation unit on the performance of an advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor
title_fullStr Effect of the arrangement of cavitation generation unit on the performance of an advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor
title_full_unstemmed Effect of the arrangement of cavitation generation unit on the performance of an advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor
title_short Effect of the arrangement of cavitation generation unit on the performance of an advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor
title_sort effect of the arrangement of cavitation generation unit on the performance of an advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37544171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106544
work_keys_str_mv AT sunxun effectofthearrangementofcavitationgenerationunitontheperformanceofanadvancedrotationalhydrodynamiccavitationreactor
AT xiagaoju effectofthearrangementofcavitationgenerationunitontheperformanceofanadvancedrotationalhydrodynamiccavitationreactor
AT youweibin effectofthearrangementofcavitationgenerationunitontheperformanceofanadvancedrotationalhydrodynamiccavitationreactor
AT jiaxiaoqi effectofthearrangementofcavitationgenerationunitontheperformanceofanadvancedrotationalhydrodynamiccavitationreactor
AT manickamsivakumar effectofthearrangementofcavitationgenerationunitontheperformanceofanadvancedrotationalhydrodynamiccavitationreactor
AT taoyang effectofthearrangementofcavitationgenerationunitontheperformanceofanadvancedrotationalhydrodynamiccavitationreactor
AT zhaoshan effectofthearrangementofcavitationgenerationunitontheperformanceofanadvancedrotationalhydrodynamiccavitationreactor
AT yoonjoonyong effectofthearrangementofcavitationgenerationunitontheperformanceofanadvancedrotationalhydrodynamiccavitationreactor
AT xuanxiaoxu effectofthearrangementofcavitationgenerationunitontheperformanceofanadvancedrotationalhydrodynamiccavitationreactor