Cargando…
Effect of the arrangement of cavitation generation unit on the performance of an advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor
Hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) is widely considered a promising process intensification technology. The novel advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactors (ARHCRs), with considerably higher performance compared with traditional devices, have gained increasing attention of academic and industri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37544171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106544 |
_version_ | 1785091358395990016 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Xun Xia, Gaoju You, Weibin Jia, Xiaoqi Manickam, Sivakumar Tao, Yang Zhao, Shan Yoon, Joon Yong Xuan, Xiaoxu |
author_facet | Sun, Xun Xia, Gaoju You, Weibin Jia, Xiaoqi Manickam, Sivakumar Tao, Yang Zhao, Shan Yoon, Joon Yong Xuan, Xiaoxu |
author_sort | Sun, Xun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) is widely considered a promising process intensification technology. The novel advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactors (ARHCRs), with considerably higher performance compared with traditional devices, have gained increasing attention of academic and industrial communities. The cavitation generation unit (CGU), located on the rotor and/or stator of an ARHCR, is utilized to generate cavitation and consequently, its geometrical structure is vital for the performance. The present work studied, for the first time, the effect of the arrangement of CGU on the performance of a representative ARHCR by employing computational fluid dynamics based on the “simplified flow field” strategy. The effect of CGU arrangement, which was neglected in the past, was evaluated: radial offset distance (c), intersection angle (ω), number of rows (N), circumferential offset angle (γ), and radial spacing (r). The results indicate that the CGU, with an arrangement of a low ω and moderate c, N, γ, and r, performed the highest cavitation efficiency. The corresponding reasons were analyzed by combining the flow field and cavitation pattern. Moreover, the results also exposed a weakness of the “simplified flow field” strategy which may induce the unfavorable “sidewall effect” and cause false high-pressure region. The findings of this work may provide a reference value to the design of ARHCRs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10432248 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104322482023-08-18 Effect of the arrangement of cavitation generation unit on the performance of an advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor Sun, Xun Xia, Gaoju You, Weibin Jia, Xiaoqi Manickam, Sivakumar Tao, Yang Zhao, Shan Yoon, Joon Yong Xuan, Xiaoxu Ultrason Sonochem Original Research Article Hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) is widely considered a promising process intensification technology. The novel advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactors (ARHCRs), with considerably higher performance compared with traditional devices, have gained increasing attention of academic and industrial communities. The cavitation generation unit (CGU), located on the rotor and/or stator of an ARHCR, is utilized to generate cavitation and consequently, its geometrical structure is vital for the performance. The present work studied, for the first time, the effect of the arrangement of CGU on the performance of a representative ARHCR by employing computational fluid dynamics based on the “simplified flow field” strategy. The effect of CGU arrangement, which was neglected in the past, was evaluated: radial offset distance (c), intersection angle (ω), number of rows (N), circumferential offset angle (γ), and radial spacing (r). The results indicate that the CGU, with an arrangement of a low ω and moderate c, N, γ, and r, performed the highest cavitation efficiency. The corresponding reasons were analyzed by combining the flow field and cavitation pattern. Moreover, the results also exposed a weakness of the “simplified flow field” strategy which may induce the unfavorable “sidewall effect” and cause false high-pressure region. The findings of this work may provide a reference value to the design of ARHCRs. Elsevier 2023-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10432248/ /pubmed/37544171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106544 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Sun, Xun Xia, Gaoju You, Weibin Jia, Xiaoqi Manickam, Sivakumar Tao, Yang Zhao, Shan Yoon, Joon Yong Xuan, Xiaoxu Effect of the arrangement of cavitation generation unit on the performance of an advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor |
title | Effect of the arrangement of cavitation generation unit on the performance of an advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor |
title_full | Effect of the arrangement of cavitation generation unit on the performance of an advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor |
title_fullStr | Effect of the arrangement of cavitation generation unit on the performance of an advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of the arrangement of cavitation generation unit on the performance of an advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor |
title_short | Effect of the arrangement of cavitation generation unit on the performance of an advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor |
title_sort | effect of the arrangement of cavitation generation unit on the performance of an advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37544171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106544 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunxun effectofthearrangementofcavitationgenerationunitontheperformanceofanadvancedrotationalhydrodynamiccavitationreactor AT xiagaoju effectofthearrangementofcavitationgenerationunitontheperformanceofanadvancedrotationalhydrodynamiccavitationreactor AT youweibin effectofthearrangementofcavitationgenerationunitontheperformanceofanadvancedrotationalhydrodynamiccavitationreactor AT jiaxiaoqi effectofthearrangementofcavitationgenerationunitontheperformanceofanadvancedrotationalhydrodynamiccavitationreactor AT manickamsivakumar effectofthearrangementofcavitationgenerationunitontheperformanceofanadvancedrotationalhydrodynamiccavitationreactor AT taoyang effectofthearrangementofcavitationgenerationunitontheperformanceofanadvancedrotationalhydrodynamiccavitationreactor AT zhaoshan effectofthearrangementofcavitationgenerationunitontheperformanceofanadvancedrotationalhydrodynamiccavitationreactor AT yoonjoonyong effectofthearrangementofcavitationgenerationunitontheperformanceofanadvancedrotationalhydrodynamiccavitationreactor AT xuanxiaoxu effectofthearrangementofcavitationgenerationunitontheperformanceofanadvancedrotationalhydrodynamiccavitationreactor |