Cargando…

A Modified Arthroscopic Outside‐in Shoulder Release Approach for Severe Shoulder Stiffness

OBJECTIVE: Arthroscopic release is effective for patients with shoulder stiffness, but the traditional inside‐out procedure cannot effectively alleviate the mobility of some severe stiff shoulder and even cause itrogenic injuries sometimes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xu‐chao, Liu, Kang, Ying, Hua, Yao, Gai, Fu, Xia‐wei, Zhou, Bo‐le, Zhou, Zhi‐you, Wang, Zi‐min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36321605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13568
_version_ 1785091417958252544
author Zhang, Xu‐chao
Liu, Kang
Ying, Hua
Yao, Gai
Fu, Xia‐wei
Zhou, Bo‐le
Zhou, Zhi‐you
Wang, Zi‐min
author_facet Zhang, Xu‐chao
Liu, Kang
Ying, Hua
Yao, Gai
Fu, Xia‐wei
Zhou, Bo‐le
Zhou, Zhi‐you
Wang, Zi‐min
author_sort Zhang, Xu‐chao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Arthroscopic release is effective for patients with shoulder stiffness, but the traditional inside‐out procedure cannot effectively alleviate the mobility of some severe stiff shoulder and even cause itrogenic injuries sometimes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and advantages of a modified outside‐in shoulder release approach for severe shoulder stiffness. METHODS: Included in this retrospective study were 15 patients (five male and 10 female) with severe shoulder stiffness who underwent modified outside‐in shoulder release surgery at our hospital between June 2019 and March 2021. Of them, 10 patients had a primary frozen shoulder and five had secondary shoulder stiffness, involving the right shoulder in six cases and the left shoulder in nine cases. The mean age of the 15 patients was 56.7 (34–69) years. The patients were instructed to exercise passively from second‐day post‐operation and enhance the rehabilitation exercise gradually. All patients received a range of motion (ROM) examination before and after surgery. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon's Score (ASES), Constant Score (CS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for pain were recorded. All data were tested by normal distribution first and then by paired T test, otherwise by Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: The mean follow‐up period was 18.2 (12–33) months. Compared with the preoperative value, the mean ASES score at the final follow‐up improved from 38.4 ± 7.37 to 88.13 ± 6.33 points; the mean CS score from 43.27 ± 6.71 to 78.74 ± 6.93 points; the mean VAS score from 5.07 ± 1.03 to 0.81 ± 0.83 points; forward flexion from 81.93° ± 11.45° to 156.73° ± 9.12°; abduction from 65.93° ± 16.82° to 144.80° ± 8.83°; neutral external rotation from 13.53° ± 10.38° to 51.20° ± 4.77°; internal rotation from the buttock to waist (L3), all showing a significant difference (P < 0.0001). No serious complication was observed in any patient during the postoperative follow‐up periods. CONCLUSION: The present study has demonstrated that the modified arthroscopic outside‐in shoulder release approach can improve ROM of patients and alleviate pain effectively, proving it to be an appropriate surgical option for the treatment of severe shoulder stiffness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10432466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104324662023-08-18 A Modified Arthroscopic Outside‐in Shoulder Release Approach for Severe Shoulder Stiffness Zhang, Xu‐chao Liu, Kang Ying, Hua Yao, Gai Fu, Xia‐wei Zhou, Bo‐le Zhou, Zhi‐you Wang, Zi‐min Orthop Surg Operative Techniques OBJECTIVE: Arthroscopic release is effective for patients with shoulder stiffness, but the traditional inside‐out procedure cannot effectively alleviate the mobility of some severe stiff shoulder and even cause itrogenic injuries sometimes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and advantages of a modified outside‐in shoulder release approach for severe shoulder stiffness. METHODS: Included in this retrospective study were 15 patients (five male and 10 female) with severe shoulder stiffness who underwent modified outside‐in shoulder release surgery at our hospital between June 2019 and March 2021. Of them, 10 patients had a primary frozen shoulder and five had secondary shoulder stiffness, involving the right shoulder in six cases and the left shoulder in nine cases. The mean age of the 15 patients was 56.7 (34–69) years. The patients were instructed to exercise passively from second‐day post‐operation and enhance the rehabilitation exercise gradually. All patients received a range of motion (ROM) examination before and after surgery. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon's Score (ASES), Constant Score (CS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for pain were recorded. All data were tested by normal distribution first and then by paired T test, otherwise by Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: The mean follow‐up period was 18.2 (12–33) months. Compared with the preoperative value, the mean ASES score at the final follow‐up improved from 38.4 ± 7.37 to 88.13 ± 6.33 points; the mean CS score from 43.27 ± 6.71 to 78.74 ± 6.93 points; the mean VAS score from 5.07 ± 1.03 to 0.81 ± 0.83 points; forward flexion from 81.93° ± 11.45° to 156.73° ± 9.12°; abduction from 65.93° ± 16.82° to 144.80° ± 8.83°; neutral external rotation from 13.53° ± 10.38° to 51.20° ± 4.77°; internal rotation from the buttock to waist (L3), all showing a significant difference (P < 0.0001). No serious complication was observed in any patient during the postoperative follow‐up periods. CONCLUSION: The present study has demonstrated that the modified arthroscopic outside‐in shoulder release approach can improve ROM of patients and alleviate pain effectively, proving it to be an appropriate surgical option for the treatment of severe shoulder stiffness. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10432466/ /pubmed/36321605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13568 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Operative Techniques
Zhang, Xu‐chao
Liu, Kang
Ying, Hua
Yao, Gai
Fu, Xia‐wei
Zhou, Bo‐le
Zhou, Zhi‐you
Wang, Zi‐min
A Modified Arthroscopic Outside‐in Shoulder Release Approach for Severe Shoulder Stiffness
title A Modified Arthroscopic Outside‐in Shoulder Release Approach for Severe Shoulder Stiffness
title_full A Modified Arthroscopic Outside‐in Shoulder Release Approach for Severe Shoulder Stiffness
title_fullStr A Modified Arthroscopic Outside‐in Shoulder Release Approach for Severe Shoulder Stiffness
title_full_unstemmed A Modified Arthroscopic Outside‐in Shoulder Release Approach for Severe Shoulder Stiffness
title_short A Modified Arthroscopic Outside‐in Shoulder Release Approach for Severe Shoulder Stiffness
title_sort modified arthroscopic outside‐in shoulder release approach for severe shoulder stiffness
topic Operative Techniques
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36321605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13568
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxuchao amodifiedarthroscopicoutsideinshoulderreleaseapproachforsevereshoulderstiffness
AT liukang amodifiedarthroscopicoutsideinshoulderreleaseapproachforsevereshoulderstiffness
AT yinghua amodifiedarthroscopicoutsideinshoulderreleaseapproachforsevereshoulderstiffness
AT yaogai amodifiedarthroscopicoutsideinshoulderreleaseapproachforsevereshoulderstiffness
AT fuxiawei amodifiedarthroscopicoutsideinshoulderreleaseapproachforsevereshoulderstiffness
AT zhoubole amodifiedarthroscopicoutsideinshoulderreleaseapproachforsevereshoulderstiffness
AT zhouzhiyou amodifiedarthroscopicoutsideinshoulderreleaseapproachforsevereshoulderstiffness
AT wangzimin amodifiedarthroscopicoutsideinshoulderreleaseapproachforsevereshoulderstiffness
AT zhangxuchao modifiedarthroscopicoutsideinshoulderreleaseapproachforsevereshoulderstiffness
AT liukang modifiedarthroscopicoutsideinshoulderreleaseapproachforsevereshoulderstiffness
AT yinghua modifiedarthroscopicoutsideinshoulderreleaseapproachforsevereshoulderstiffness
AT yaogai modifiedarthroscopicoutsideinshoulderreleaseapproachforsevereshoulderstiffness
AT fuxiawei modifiedarthroscopicoutsideinshoulderreleaseapproachforsevereshoulderstiffness
AT zhoubole modifiedarthroscopicoutsideinshoulderreleaseapproachforsevereshoulderstiffness
AT zhouzhiyou modifiedarthroscopicoutsideinshoulderreleaseapproachforsevereshoulderstiffness
AT wangzimin modifiedarthroscopicoutsideinshoulderreleaseapproachforsevereshoulderstiffness