Cargando…

Conflict of interest and funding in health communication on social media: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: To synthesise the available evidence on the reporting of conflicts of interest (COI) by individuals posting health messages on social media, and on the reporting of funding sources of studies cited in health messages on social media. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (OVID) (2005–March 2022), Embase...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Helou, Vanessa, Mouzahem, Fatima, Makarem, Adham, Noureldine, Hussein A, El-Khoury, Rayane, Al Oweini, Dana, Halak, Razan, Hneiny, Layal, Khabsa, Joanne, Akl, Elie A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37580091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072258
_version_ 1785091473311531008
author Helou, Vanessa
Mouzahem, Fatima
Makarem, Adham
Noureldine, Hussein A
El-Khoury, Rayane
Al Oweini, Dana
Halak, Razan
Hneiny, Layal
Khabsa, Joanne
Akl, Elie A
author_facet Helou, Vanessa
Mouzahem, Fatima
Makarem, Adham
Noureldine, Hussein A
El-Khoury, Rayane
Al Oweini, Dana
Halak, Razan
Hneiny, Layal
Khabsa, Joanne
Akl, Elie A
author_sort Helou, Vanessa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To synthesise the available evidence on the reporting of conflicts of interest (COI) by individuals posting health messages on social media, and on the reporting of funding sources of studies cited in health messages on social media. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (OVID) (2005–March 2022), Embase (2005–March 2022) and Google Scholar (2005–August 2022), supplemented with a review of reference lists and forward citation tracking. DESIGN: Reviewers selected eligible studies and abstracted data in duplicate and independently. We appraised the quality of the included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We summarised the results in both narrative and tabular formats. We followed the PRISMA 2020 checklist for reporting our study. RESULTS: Of a total of 16 645 retrieved citations, we included 17 eligible studies. The frequency of reporting of conflicts of interest varied between 0% and 60%, but it was mostly low. In addition, a significant proportion, ranging between 15% and 80%, of healthcare professionals using social media have financial relationships with industry. However, three studies assessed the proportion of conflicts of interest of physicians identified through Open Payment Database but not reported by the authors. It was found that 98.7–100% of these relationships with industry are not reported when communicating health-related information. Also, two studies showed that there is evidence of a potential association between COI and the content of posting. No data was found on the reporting of funding sources of studies cited in health messages on social media. CONCLUSIONS: While a significant proportion of healthcare professionals using social media have financial relationships with industry, lack of reporting on COI and undisclosed COI are common. We did not find studies on the reporting of funding sources of studies cited in health messages on social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION: dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.5jyl8jj4rg2w/v1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10432670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104326702023-08-18 Conflict of interest and funding in health communication on social media: a systematic review Helou, Vanessa Mouzahem, Fatima Makarem, Adham Noureldine, Hussein A El-Khoury, Rayane Al Oweini, Dana Halak, Razan Hneiny, Layal Khabsa, Joanne Akl, Elie A BMJ Open Ethics OBJECTIVES: To synthesise the available evidence on the reporting of conflicts of interest (COI) by individuals posting health messages on social media, and on the reporting of funding sources of studies cited in health messages on social media. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (OVID) (2005–March 2022), Embase (2005–March 2022) and Google Scholar (2005–August 2022), supplemented with a review of reference lists and forward citation tracking. DESIGN: Reviewers selected eligible studies and abstracted data in duplicate and independently. We appraised the quality of the included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We summarised the results in both narrative and tabular formats. We followed the PRISMA 2020 checklist for reporting our study. RESULTS: Of a total of 16 645 retrieved citations, we included 17 eligible studies. The frequency of reporting of conflicts of interest varied between 0% and 60%, but it was mostly low. In addition, a significant proportion, ranging between 15% and 80%, of healthcare professionals using social media have financial relationships with industry. However, three studies assessed the proportion of conflicts of interest of physicians identified through Open Payment Database but not reported by the authors. It was found that 98.7–100% of these relationships with industry are not reported when communicating health-related information. Also, two studies showed that there is evidence of a potential association between COI and the content of posting. No data was found on the reporting of funding sources of studies cited in health messages on social media. CONCLUSIONS: While a significant proportion of healthcare professionals using social media have financial relationships with industry, lack of reporting on COI and undisclosed COI are common. We did not find studies on the reporting of funding sources of studies cited in health messages on social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION: dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.5jyl8jj4rg2w/v1. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10432670/ /pubmed/37580091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072258 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Ethics
Helou, Vanessa
Mouzahem, Fatima
Makarem, Adham
Noureldine, Hussein A
El-Khoury, Rayane
Al Oweini, Dana
Halak, Razan
Hneiny, Layal
Khabsa, Joanne
Akl, Elie A
Conflict of interest and funding in health communication on social media: a systematic review
title Conflict of interest and funding in health communication on social media: a systematic review
title_full Conflict of interest and funding in health communication on social media: a systematic review
title_fullStr Conflict of interest and funding in health communication on social media: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Conflict of interest and funding in health communication on social media: a systematic review
title_short Conflict of interest and funding in health communication on social media: a systematic review
title_sort conflict of interest and funding in health communication on social media: a systematic review
topic Ethics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37580091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072258
work_keys_str_mv AT helouvanessa conflictofinterestandfundinginhealthcommunicationonsocialmediaasystematicreview
AT mouzahemfatima conflictofinterestandfundinginhealthcommunicationonsocialmediaasystematicreview
AT makaremadham conflictofinterestandfundinginhealthcommunicationonsocialmediaasystematicreview
AT noureldinehusseina conflictofinterestandfundinginhealthcommunicationonsocialmediaasystematicreview
AT elkhouryrayane conflictofinterestandfundinginhealthcommunicationonsocialmediaasystematicreview
AT aloweinidana conflictofinterestandfundinginhealthcommunicationonsocialmediaasystematicreview
AT halakrazan conflictofinterestandfundinginhealthcommunicationonsocialmediaasystematicreview
AT hneinylayal conflictofinterestandfundinginhealthcommunicationonsocialmediaasystematicreview
AT khabsajoanne conflictofinterestandfundinginhealthcommunicationonsocialmediaasystematicreview
AT akleliea conflictofinterestandfundinginhealthcommunicationonsocialmediaasystematicreview