Cargando…

Forming a consensus opinion to inform long COVID support mechanisms and interventions: a modified Delphi approach

BACKGROUND: Current approaches to support patients living with post-COVID condition, also known as Long COVID, are highly disparate with limited success in managing or resolving a well-documented and long-standing symptom burden. With approximately 2.1 million people living with the condition in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Owen, Rebecca, Ashton, Ruth E.M., Ferraro, Francesco V., Skipper, Lindsay, Bewick, Tom, Leighton, Paul, Phillips, Bethan E., Faghy, Mark A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37599906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102145
_version_ 1785091505865621504
author Owen, Rebecca
Ashton, Ruth E.M.
Ferraro, Francesco V.
Skipper, Lindsay
Bewick, Tom
Leighton, Paul
Phillips, Bethan E.
Faghy, Mark A.
author_facet Owen, Rebecca
Ashton, Ruth E.M.
Ferraro, Francesco V.
Skipper, Lindsay
Bewick, Tom
Leighton, Paul
Phillips, Bethan E.
Faghy, Mark A.
author_sort Owen, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current approaches to support patients living with post-COVID condition, also known as Long COVID, are highly disparate with limited success in managing or resolving a well-documented and long-standing symptom burden. With approximately 2.1 million people living with the condition in the UK alone and millions more worldwide, there is a desperate need to devise support strategies and interventions for patients. METHODS: A three-round Delphi consensus methodology was distributed internationally using an online survey and was completed by healthcare professionals (including clinicians, physiotherapists, and general practitioners), people with long COVID, and long COVID academic researchers (round 1 n = 273, round 2 n = 186, round 3 n = 138). Across the three rounds, respondents were located predominantly in the United Kingdom (UK), with 17.3–15.2% (round 1, n = 47; round 2 n = 32, round 2 n = 21) of respondents located elsewhere (United States of America (USA), Austria, Malta, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Finland, Norway, Malta, Netherlands, Iceland, Canada, Tunisie, Brazil, Hungary, Greece, France, Austrailia, South Africa, Serbia, and India). Respondents were given ∼5 weeks to complete the survey following enrolment, with round one taking place from 02/15/2022 to 03/28/22, round two; 05/09/2022 to 06/26/2022, and round 3; 07/14/2022 to 08/09/2022. A 5-point Likert scale of agreement was used and the opportunity to include free text responses was provided in the first round. FINDINGS: Fifty-five statements reached consensus (defined as >80% agree and strongly agree), across the domains of i) long COVID as a condition, ii) current support and care available for long COVID, iii) clinical assessments for long COVID, and iv) support mechanisms and rehabilitation interventions for long COVID, further sub-categorised by consideration, inclusion, and focus. Consensus reached proposes that long COVID requires specialised, comprehensive support mechanisms and that interventions should form a personalised care plan guided by the needs of the patients. Supportive approaches should focus on individual symptoms, including but not limited to fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, and dyspnoea, utilising pacing, fatigue management, and support returning to daily activities. The mental impact of living with long COVID, tolerance to physical activity, emotional distress and well-being, and research of pre-existing conditions with similar symptoms, such as myalgic encephalomyelitis, should also be considered when supporting people with long COVID. INTERPRETATION: We provide an outline that achieved consensus with stakeholders that could be used to inform the design and implementation of bespoke long COVID support mechanisms. FUNDING: None.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10432807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104328072023-08-18 Forming a consensus opinion to inform long COVID support mechanisms and interventions: a modified Delphi approach Owen, Rebecca Ashton, Ruth E.M. Ferraro, Francesco V. Skipper, Lindsay Bewick, Tom Leighton, Paul Phillips, Bethan E. Faghy, Mark A. eClinicalMedicine Articles BACKGROUND: Current approaches to support patients living with post-COVID condition, also known as Long COVID, are highly disparate with limited success in managing or resolving a well-documented and long-standing symptom burden. With approximately 2.1 million people living with the condition in the UK alone and millions more worldwide, there is a desperate need to devise support strategies and interventions for patients. METHODS: A three-round Delphi consensus methodology was distributed internationally using an online survey and was completed by healthcare professionals (including clinicians, physiotherapists, and general practitioners), people with long COVID, and long COVID academic researchers (round 1 n = 273, round 2 n = 186, round 3 n = 138). Across the three rounds, respondents were located predominantly in the United Kingdom (UK), with 17.3–15.2% (round 1, n = 47; round 2 n = 32, round 2 n = 21) of respondents located elsewhere (United States of America (USA), Austria, Malta, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Finland, Norway, Malta, Netherlands, Iceland, Canada, Tunisie, Brazil, Hungary, Greece, France, Austrailia, South Africa, Serbia, and India). Respondents were given ∼5 weeks to complete the survey following enrolment, with round one taking place from 02/15/2022 to 03/28/22, round two; 05/09/2022 to 06/26/2022, and round 3; 07/14/2022 to 08/09/2022. A 5-point Likert scale of agreement was used and the opportunity to include free text responses was provided in the first round. FINDINGS: Fifty-five statements reached consensus (defined as >80% agree and strongly agree), across the domains of i) long COVID as a condition, ii) current support and care available for long COVID, iii) clinical assessments for long COVID, and iv) support mechanisms and rehabilitation interventions for long COVID, further sub-categorised by consideration, inclusion, and focus. Consensus reached proposes that long COVID requires specialised, comprehensive support mechanisms and that interventions should form a personalised care plan guided by the needs of the patients. Supportive approaches should focus on individual symptoms, including but not limited to fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, and dyspnoea, utilising pacing, fatigue management, and support returning to daily activities. The mental impact of living with long COVID, tolerance to physical activity, emotional distress and well-being, and research of pre-existing conditions with similar symptoms, such as myalgic encephalomyelitis, should also be considered when supporting people with long COVID. INTERPRETATION: We provide an outline that achieved consensus with stakeholders that could be used to inform the design and implementation of bespoke long COVID support mechanisms. FUNDING: None. Elsevier 2023-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10432807/ /pubmed/37599906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102145 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Owen, Rebecca
Ashton, Ruth E.M.
Ferraro, Francesco V.
Skipper, Lindsay
Bewick, Tom
Leighton, Paul
Phillips, Bethan E.
Faghy, Mark A.
Forming a consensus opinion to inform long COVID support mechanisms and interventions: a modified Delphi approach
title Forming a consensus opinion to inform long COVID support mechanisms and interventions: a modified Delphi approach
title_full Forming a consensus opinion to inform long COVID support mechanisms and interventions: a modified Delphi approach
title_fullStr Forming a consensus opinion to inform long COVID support mechanisms and interventions: a modified Delphi approach
title_full_unstemmed Forming a consensus opinion to inform long COVID support mechanisms and interventions: a modified Delphi approach
title_short Forming a consensus opinion to inform long COVID support mechanisms and interventions: a modified Delphi approach
title_sort forming a consensus opinion to inform long covid support mechanisms and interventions: a modified delphi approach
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37599906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102145
work_keys_str_mv AT owenrebecca formingaconsensusopiniontoinformlongcovidsupportmechanismsandinterventionsamodifieddelphiapproach
AT ashtonruthem formingaconsensusopiniontoinformlongcovidsupportmechanismsandinterventionsamodifieddelphiapproach
AT ferrarofrancescov formingaconsensusopiniontoinformlongcovidsupportmechanismsandinterventionsamodifieddelphiapproach
AT skipperlindsay formingaconsensusopiniontoinformlongcovidsupportmechanismsandinterventionsamodifieddelphiapproach
AT bewicktom formingaconsensusopiniontoinformlongcovidsupportmechanismsandinterventionsamodifieddelphiapproach
AT leightonpaul formingaconsensusopiniontoinformlongcovidsupportmechanismsandinterventionsamodifieddelphiapproach
AT phillipsbethane formingaconsensusopiniontoinformlongcovidsupportmechanismsandinterventionsamodifieddelphiapproach
AT faghymarka formingaconsensusopiniontoinformlongcovidsupportmechanismsandinterventionsamodifieddelphiapproach