Cargando…

Neurofeedback on twitter: Evaluation of the scientific credibility and communication about the technique

Neurofeedback is a popular technique to induce neuroplasticity with a controversial reputation. The public discourse on neurofeedback, as a therapeutic and neuroenhancement technique, encompasses scientific communication, therapeutic expectations and outcomes, as well as complementary and alternativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kober, Silvia Erika, Buchrieser, Finn, Wood, Guilherme
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18931
_version_ 1785091542375989248
author Kober, Silvia Erika
Buchrieser, Finn
Wood, Guilherme
author_facet Kober, Silvia Erika
Buchrieser, Finn
Wood, Guilherme
author_sort Kober, Silvia Erika
collection PubMed
description Neurofeedback is a popular technique to induce neuroplasticity with a controversial reputation. The public discourse on neurofeedback, as a therapeutic and neuroenhancement technique, encompasses scientific communication, therapeutic expectations and outcomes, as well as complementary and alternative practices. We investigated twitter publications from 2010 to 2022 on the keyword “neurofeedback”. A total of over 138 k tweets were obtained, which originated from over 42 k different users. The communication flow in the neurofeedback community is mainly unidirectional and non-interactive. Analysis of hashtags revealed application fields, therapy provider and neuroenhancement to be the most popular contents in neurofeedback communication. A group of 1221 productive users was identified, in which clinicians, entrepreneurs, broadcasters, and scientists contribute. We identified reactions to critical publications in the twitter traffic and an increase in the number of tweets by academic users which suggest an increase in the interest on the scientific credibility of neurofeedback. More intense scientific communication on neurofeedback in twitter may contribute to promote a more realistic view on challenges and advances regarding good scientific practice of neurofeedback.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10432958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104329582023-08-18 Neurofeedback on twitter: Evaluation of the scientific credibility and communication about the technique Kober, Silvia Erika Buchrieser, Finn Wood, Guilherme Heliyon Research Article Neurofeedback is a popular technique to induce neuroplasticity with a controversial reputation. The public discourse on neurofeedback, as a therapeutic and neuroenhancement technique, encompasses scientific communication, therapeutic expectations and outcomes, as well as complementary and alternative practices. We investigated twitter publications from 2010 to 2022 on the keyword “neurofeedback”. A total of over 138 k tweets were obtained, which originated from over 42 k different users. The communication flow in the neurofeedback community is mainly unidirectional and non-interactive. Analysis of hashtags revealed application fields, therapy provider and neuroenhancement to be the most popular contents in neurofeedback communication. A group of 1221 productive users was identified, in which clinicians, entrepreneurs, broadcasters, and scientists contribute. We identified reactions to critical publications in the twitter traffic and an increase in the number of tweets by academic users which suggest an increase in the interest on the scientific credibility of neurofeedback. More intense scientific communication on neurofeedback in twitter may contribute to promote a more realistic view on challenges and advances regarding good scientific practice of neurofeedback. Elsevier 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10432958/ /pubmed/37600360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18931 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Kober, Silvia Erika
Buchrieser, Finn
Wood, Guilherme
Neurofeedback on twitter: Evaluation of the scientific credibility and communication about the technique
title Neurofeedback on twitter: Evaluation of the scientific credibility and communication about the technique
title_full Neurofeedback on twitter: Evaluation of the scientific credibility and communication about the technique
title_fullStr Neurofeedback on twitter: Evaluation of the scientific credibility and communication about the technique
title_full_unstemmed Neurofeedback on twitter: Evaluation of the scientific credibility and communication about the technique
title_short Neurofeedback on twitter: Evaluation of the scientific credibility and communication about the technique
title_sort neurofeedback on twitter: evaluation of the scientific credibility and communication about the technique
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18931
work_keys_str_mv AT kobersilviaerika neurofeedbackontwitterevaluationofthescientificcredibilityandcommunicationaboutthetechnique
AT buchrieserfinn neurofeedbackontwitterevaluationofthescientificcredibilityandcommunicationaboutthetechnique
AT woodguilherme neurofeedbackontwitterevaluationofthescientificcredibilityandcommunicationaboutthetechnique