Cargando…

Development and preclinical evaluation of bioactive nerve conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study

In severe peripheral nerve injuries, nerve conduits (NCs) are good alternatives to autografts/allografts; however, the results the available devices guarantee for are still not fully satisfactory. Herein, differently bioactivated NCs based on the new polymer oxidized polyvinyl alcohol (OxPVA) are co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stocco, Elena, Barbon, Silvia, Faccio, Diego, Petrelli, Lucia, Incendi, Damiana, Zamuner, Annj, De Rose, Enrico, Confalonieri, Marta, Tolomei, Francesco, Todros, Silvia, Tiengo, Cesare, Macchi, Veronica, Dettin, Monica, De Caro, Raffaele, Porzionato, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10433238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100761
_version_ 1785091606172401664
author Stocco, Elena
Barbon, Silvia
Faccio, Diego
Petrelli, Lucia
Incendi, Damiana
Zamuner, Annj
De Rose, Enrico
Confalonieri, Marta
Tolomei, Francesco
Todros, Silvia
Tiengo, Cesare
Macchi, Veronica
Dettin, Monica
De Caro, Raffaele
Porzionato, Andrea
author_facet Stocco, Elena
Barbon, Silvia
Faccio, Diego
Petrelli, Lucia
Incendi, Damiana
Zamuner, Annj
De Rose, Enrico
Confalonieri, Marta
Tolomei, Francesco
Todros, Silvia
Tiengo, Cesare
Macchi, Veronica
Dettin, Monica
De Caro, Raffaele
Porzionato, Andrea
author_sort Stocco, Elena
collection PubMed
description In severe peripheral nerve injuries, nerve conduits (NCs) are good alternatives to autografts/allografts; however, the results the available devices guarantee for are still not fully satisfactory. Herein, differently bioactivated NCs based on the new polymer oxidized polyvinyl alcohol (OxPVA) are compared in a rat model of sciatic nerve neurotmesis (gap: 5 mm; end point: 6 weeks). Thirty Sprague Dawley rats are randomized to 6 groups: Reverse Autograft (RA); Reaxon®; OxPVA; OxPVA + EAK (self-assembling peptide, mechanical incorporation); OxPVA + EAK-YIGSR (mechanical incorporation); OxPVA + Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) (adsorption). Preliminarily, all OxPVA-based devices are comparable with Reaxon® in Sciatic Functional Index score and gait analysis; moreover, all conduits sustain nerve regeneration (S100, β-tubulin) without showing substantial inflammation (CD3, F4/80) evidences. Following morphometric analyses, OxPVA confirms its potential in PNI repair (comparable with Reaxon®) whereas OxPVA + EAK-YIGSR stands out for its myelinated axons total number and density, revealing promising in injury recovery and for future application in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10433238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104332382023-08-18 Development and preclinical evaluation of bioactive nerve conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study Stocco, Elena Barbon, Silvia Faccio, Diego Petrelli, Lucia Incendi, Damiana Zamuner, Annj De Rose, Enrico Confalonieri, Marta Tolomei, Francesco Todros, Silvia Tiengo, Cesare Macchi, Veronica Dettin, Monica De Caro, Raffaele Porzionato, Andrea Mater Today Bio Full Length Article In severe peripheral nerve injuries, nerve conduits (NCs) are good alternatives to autografts/allografts; however, the results the available devices guarantee for are still not fully satisfactory. Herein, differently bioactivated NCs based on the new polymer oxidized polyvinyl alcohol (OxPVA) are compared in a rat model of sciatic nerve neurotmesis (gap: 5 mm; end point: 6 weeks). Thirty Sprague Dawley rats are randomized to 6 groups: Reverse Autograft (RA); Reaxon®; OxPVA; OxPVA + EAK (self-assembling peptide, mechanical incorporation); OxPVA + EAK-YIGSR (mechanical incorporation); OxPVA + Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) (adsorption). Preliminarily, all OxPVA-based devices are comparable with Reaxon® in Sciatic Functional Index score and gait analysis; moreover, all conduits sustain nerve regeneration (S100, β-tubulin) without showing substantial inflammation (CD3, F4/80) evidences. Following morphometric analyses, OxPVA confirms its potential in PNI repair (comparable with Reaxon®) whereas OxPVA + EAK-YIGSR stands out for its myelinated axons total number and density, revealing promising in injury recovery and for future application in clinical practice. Elsevier 2023-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10433238/ /pubmed/37600351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100761 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Full Length Article
Stocco, Elena
Barbon, Silvia
Faccio, Diego
Petrelli, Lucia
Incendi, Damiana
Zamuner, Annj
De Rose, Enrico
Confalonieri, Marta
Tolomei, Francesco
Todros, Silvia
Tiengo, Cesare
Macchi, Veronica
Dettin, Monica
De Caro, Raffaele
Porzionato, Andrea
Development and preclinical evaluation of bioactive nerve conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study
title Development and preclinical evaluation of bioactive nerve conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study
title_full Development and preclinical evaluation of bioactive nerve conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study
title_fullStr Development and preclinical evaluation of bioactive nerve conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Development and preclinical evaluation of bioactive nerve conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study
title_short Development and preclinical evaluation of bioactive nerve conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study
title_sort development and preclinical evaluation of bioactive nerve conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration: a comparative study
topic Full Length Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10433238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100761
work_keys_str_mv AT stoccoelena developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy
AT barbonsilvia developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy
AT facciodiego developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy
AT petrellilucia developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy
AT incendidamiana developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy
AT zamunerannj developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy
AT deroseenrico developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy
AT confalonierimarta developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy
AT tolomeifrancesco developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy
AT todrossilvia developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy
AT tiengocesare developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy
AT macchiveronica developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy
AT dettinmonica developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy
AT decaroraffaele developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy
AT porzionatoandrea developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy