Cargando…
Development and preclinical evaluation of bioactive nerve conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study
In severe peripheral nerve injuries, nerve conduits (NCs) are good alternatives to autografts/allografts; however, the results the available devices guarantee for are still not fully satisfactory. Herein, differently bioactivated NCs based on the new polymer oxidized polyvinyl alcohol (OxPVA) are co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10433238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100761 |
_version_ | 1785091606172401664 |
---|---|
author | Stocco, Elena Barbon, Silvia Faccio, Diego Petrelli, Lucia Incendi, Damiana Zamuner, Annj De Rose, Enrico Confalonieri, Marta Tolomei, Francesco Todros, Silvia Tiengo, Cesare Macchi, Veronica Dettin, Monica De Caro, Raffaele Porzionato, Andrea |
author_facet | Stocco, Elena Barbon, Silvia Faccio, Diego Petrelli, Lucia Incendi, Damiana Zamuner, Annj De Rose, Enrico Confalonieri, Marta Tolomei, Francesco Todros, Silvia Tiengo, Cesare Macchi, Veronica Dettin, Monica De Caro, Raffaele Porzionato, Andrea |
author_sort | Stocco, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | In severe peripheral nerve injuries, nerve conduits (NCs) are good alternatives to autografts/allografts; however, the results the available devices guarantee for are still not fully satisfactory. Herein, differently bioactivated NCs based on the new polymer oxidized polyvinyl alcohol (OxPVA) are compared in a rat model of sciatic nerve neurotmesis (gap: 5 mm; end point: 6 weeks). Thirty Sprague Dawley rats are randomized to 6 groups: Reverse Autograft (RA); Reaxon®; OxPVA; OxPVA + EAK (self-assembling peptide, mechanical incorporation); OxPVA + EAK-YIGSR (mechanical incorporation); OxPVA + Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) (adsorption). Preliminarily, all OxPVA-based devices are comparable with Reaxon® in Sciatic Functional Index score and gait analysis; moreover, all conduits sustain nerve regeneration (S100, β-tubulin) without showing substantial inflammation (CD3, F4/80) evidences. Following morphometric analyses, OxPVA confirms its potential in PNI repair (comparable with Reaxon®) whereas OxPVA + EAK-YIGSR stands out for its myelinated axons total number and density, revealing promising in injury recovery and for future application in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10433238 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104332382023-08-18 Development and preclinical evaluation of bioactive nerve conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study Stocco, Elena Barbon, Silvia Faccio, Diego Petrelli, Lucia Incendi, Damiana Zamuner, Annj De Rose, Enrico Confalonieri, Marta Tolomei, Francesco Todros, Silvia Tiengo, Cesare Macchi, Veronica Dettin, Monica De Caro, Raffaele Porzionato, Andrea Mater Today Bio Full Length Article In severe peripheral nerve injuries, nerve conduits (NCs) are good alternatives to autografts/allografts; however, the results the available devices guarantee for are still not fully satisfactory. Herein, differently bioactivated NCs based on the new polymer oxidized polyvinyl alcohol (OxPVA) are compared in a rat model of sciatic nerve neurotmesis (gap: 5 mm; end point: 6 weeks). Thirty Sprague Dawley rats are randomized to 6 groups: Reverse Autograft (RA); Reaxon®; OxPVA; OxPVA + EAK (self-assembling peptide, mechanical incorporation); OxPVA + EAK-YIGSR (mechanical incorporation); OxPVA + Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) (adsorption). Preliminarily, all OxPVA-based devices are comparable with Reaxon® in Sciatic Functional Index score and gait analysis; moreover, all conduits sustain nerve regeneration (S100, β-tubulin) without showing substantial inflammation (CD3, F4/80) evidences. Following morphometric analyses, OxPVA confirms its potential in PNI repair (comparable with Reaxon®) whereas OxPVA + EAK-YIGSR stands out for its myelinated axons total number and density, revealing promising in injury recovery and for future application in clinical practice. Elsevier 2023-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10433238/ /pubmed/37600351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100761 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Full Length Article Stocco, Elena Barbon, Silvia Faccio, Diego Petrelli, Lucia Incendi, Damiana Zamuner, Annj De Rose, Enrico Confalonieri, Marta Tolomei, Francesco Todros, Silvia Tiengo, Cesare Macchi, Veronica Dettin, Monica De Caro, Raffaele Porzionato, Andrea Development and preclinical evaluation of bioactive nerve conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study |
title | Development and preclinical evaluation of bioactive nerve conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study |
title_full | Development and preclinical evaluation of bioactive nerve conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study |
title_fullStr | Development and preclinical evaluation of bioactive nerve conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and preclinical evaluation of bioactive nerve conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study |
title_short | Development and preclinical evaluation of bioactive nerve conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study |
title_sort | development and preclinical evaluation of bioactive nerve conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration: a comparative study |
topic | Full Length Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10433238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100761 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stoccoelena developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy AT barbonsilvia developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy AT facciodiego developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy AT petrellilucia developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy AT incendidamiana developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy AT zamunerannj developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy AT deroseenrico developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy AT confalonierimarta developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy AT tolomeifrancesco developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy AT todrossilvia developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy AT tiengocesare developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy AT macchiveronica developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy AT dettinmonica developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy AT decaroraffaele developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy AT porzionatoandrea developmentandpreclinicalevaluationofbioactivenerveconduitsforperipheralnerveregenerationacomparativestudy |