Cargando…
Predicting ward transfer mortality with machine learning
In order to address a long standing challenge for internal medicine physicians we developed artificial intelligence (AI) models to identify patients at risk of increased mortality. After querying 2,425 records of patients transferred from non-intensive care units to intensive care units from the Vet...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10433377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37601037 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1191320 |
_version_ | 1785091634999853056 |
---|---|
author | Lezama, Jose L. Alterovitz, Gil Jakey, Colleen E. Kraus, Ana L. Kim, Michael J. Borkowski, Andrew A. |
author_facet | Lezama, Jose L. Alterovitz, Gil Jakey, Colleen E. Kraus, Ana L. Kim, Michael J. Borkowski, Andrew A. |
author_sort | Lezama, Jose L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In order to address a long standing challenge for internal medicine physicians we developed artificial intelligence (AI) models to identify patients at risk of increased mortality. After querying 2,425 records of patients transferred from non-intensive care units to intensive care units from the Veteran Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW), we created two datasets. The former used 22 independent variables that included “Length of Hospital Stay” and “Days to Intensive Care Transfer,” and the latter lacked these two variables. Since these two variables are unknown at the time of admission, the second set is more clinically relevant. We trained 16 machine learning models using both datasets. The best-performing models were fine-tuned and evaluated. The LightGBM model achieved the best results for both datasets. The model trained with 22 variables achieved a Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve-Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.89 and an accuracy of 0.72, with a sensitivity of 0.97 and a specificity of 0.68. The model trained with 20 variables achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.86 and an accuracy of 0.71, with a sensitivity of 0.94 and a specificity of 0.67. The top features for the former model included “Total length of Stay,” “Admit to ICU Transfer Days,” and “Lymphocyte Next Lab Value.” For the latter model, the top features included “Lymphocyte First Lab Value,” “Hemoglobin First Lab Value,” and “Hemoglobin Next Lab Value.” Our clinically relevant predictive mortality model can assist providers in optimizing resource utilization when managing large caseloads, particularly during shift changes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10433377 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104333772023-08-18 Predicting ward transfer mortality with machine learning Lezama, Jose L. Alterovitz, Gil Jakey, Colleen E. Kraus, Ana L. Kim, Michael J. Borkowski, Andrew A. Front Artif Intell Artificial Intelligence In order to address a long standing challenge for internal medicine physicians we developed artificial intelligence (AI) models to identify patients at risk of increased mortality. After querying 2,425 records of patients transferred from non-intensive care units to intensive care units from the Veteran Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW), we created two datasets. The former used 22 independent variables that included “Length of Hospital Stay” and “Days to Intensive Care Transfer,” and the latter lacked these two variables. Since these two variables are unknown at the time of admission, the second set is more clinically relevant. We trained 16 machine learning models using both datasets. The best-performing models were fine-tuned and evaluated. The LightGBM model achieved the best results for both datasets. The model trained with 22 variables achieved a Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve-Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.89 and an accuracy of 0.72, with a sensitivity of 0.97 and a specificity of 0.68. The model trained with 20 variables achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.86 and an accuracy of 0.71, with a sensitivity of 0.94 and a specificity of 0.67. The top features for the former model included “Total length of Stay,” “Admit to ICU Transfer Days,” and “Lymphocyte Next Lab Value.” For the latter model, the top features included “Lymphocyte First Lab Value,” “Hemoglobin First Lab Value,” and “Hemoglobin Next Lab Value.” Our clinically relevant predictive mortality model can assist providers in optimizing resource utilization when managing large caseloads, particularly during shift changes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10433377/ /pubmed/37601037 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1191320 Text en Copyright © 2023 Lezama, Alterovitz, Jakey, Kraus, Kim and Borkowski. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Artificial Intelligence Lezama, Jose L. Alterovitz, Gil Jakey, Colleen E. Kraus, Ana L. Kim, Michael J. Borkowski, Andrew A. Predicting ward transfer mortality with machine learning |
title | Predicting ward transfer mortality with machine learning |
title_full | Predicting ward transfer mortality with machine learning |
title_fullStr | Predicting ward transfer mortality with machine learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting ward transfer mortality with machine learning |
title_short | Predicting ward transfer mortality with machine learning |
title_sort | predicting ward transfer mortality with machine learning |
topic | Artificial Intelligence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10433377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37601037 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1191320 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lezamajosel predictingwardtransfermortalitywithmachinelearning AT alterovitzgil predictingwardtransfermortalitywithmachinelearning AT jakeycolleene predictingwardtransfermortalitywithmachinelearning AT krausanal predictingwardtransfermortalitywithmachinelearning AT kimmichaelj predictingwardtransfermortalitywithmachinelearning AT borkowskiandrewa predictingwardtransfermortalitywithmachinelearning |