Cargando…

Predicting ward transfer mortality with machine learning

In order to address a long standing challenge for internal medicine physicians we developed artificial intelligence (AI) models to identify patients at risk of increased mortality. After querying 2,425 records of patients transferred from non-intensive care units to intensive care units from the Vet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lezama, Jose L., Alterovitz, Gil, Jakey, Colleen E., Kraus, Ana L., Kim, Michael J., Borkowski, Andrew A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10433377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37601037
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1191320
_version_ 1785091634999853056
author Lezama, Jose L.
Alterovitz, Gil
Jakey, Colleen E.
Kraus, Ana L.
Kim, Michael J.
Borkowski, Andrew A.
author_facet Lezama, Jose L.
Alterovitz, Gil
Jakey, Colleen E.
Kraus, Ana L.
Kim, Michael J.
Borkowski, Andrew A.
author_sort Lezama, Jose L.
collection PubMed
description In order to address a long standing challenge for internal medicine physicians we developed artificial intelligence (AI) models to identify patients at risk of increased mortality. After querying 2,425 records of patients transferred from non-intensive care units to intensive care units from the Veteran Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW), we created two datasets. The former used 22 independent variables that included “Length of Hospital Stay” and “Days to Intensive Care Transfer,” and the latter lacked these two variables. Since these two variables are unknown at the time of admission, the second set is more clinically relevant. We trained 16 machine learning models using both datasets. The best-performing models were fine-tuned and evaluated. The LightGBM model achieved the best results for both datasets. The model trained with 22 variables achieved a Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve-Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.89 and an accuracy of 0.72, with a sensitivity of 0.97 and a specificity of 0.68. The model trained with 20 variables achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.86 and an accuracy of 0.71, with a sensitivity of 0.94 and a specificity of 0.67. The top features for the former model included “Total length of Stay,” “Admit to ICU Transfer Days,” and “Lymphocyte Next Lab Value.” For the latter model, the top features included “Lymphocyte First Lab Value,” “Hemoglobin First Lab Value,” and “Hemoglobin Next Lab Value.” Our clinically relevant predictive mortality model can assist providers in optimizing resource utilization when managing large caseloads, particularly during shift changes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10433377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104333772023-08-18 Predicting ward transfer mortality with machine learning Lezama, Jose L. Alterovitz, Gil Jakey, Colleen E. Kraus, Ana L. Kim, Michael J. Borkowski, Andrew A. Front Artif Intell Artificial Intelligence In order to address a long standing challenge for internal medicine physicians we developed artificial intelligence (AI) models to identify patients at risk of increased mortality. After querying 2,425 records of patients transferred from non-intensive care units to intensive care units from the Veteran Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW), we created two datasets. The former used 22 independent variables that included “Length of Hospital Stay” and “Days to Intensive Care Transfer,” and the latter lacked these two variables. Since these two variables are unknown at the time of admission, the second set is more clinically relevant. We trained 16 machine learning models using both datasets. The best-performing models were fine-tuned and evaluated. The LightGBM model achieved the best results for both datasets. The model trained with 22 variables achieved a Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve-Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.89 and an accuracy of 0.72, with a sensitivity of 0.97 and a specificity of 0.68. The model trained with 20 variables achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.86 and an accuracy of 0.71, with a sensitivity of 0.94 and a specificity of 0.67. The top features for the former model included “Total length of Stay,” “Admit to ICU Transfer Days,” and “Lymphocyte Next Lab Value.” For the latter model, the top features included “Lymphocyte First Lab Value,” “Hemoglobin First Lab Value,” and “Hemoglobin Next Lab Value.” Our clinically relevant predictive mortality model can assist providers in optimizing resource utilization when managing large caseloads, particularly during shift changes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10433377/ /pubmed/37601037 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1191320 Text en Copyright © 2023 Lezama, Alterovitz, Jakey, Kraus, Kim and Borkowski. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Artificial Intelligence
Lezama, Jose L.
Alterovitz, Gil
Jakey, Colleen E.
Kraus, Ana L.
Kim, Michael J.
Borkowski, Andrew A.
Predicting ward transfer mortality with machine learning
title Predicting ward transfer mortality with machine learning
title_full Predicting ward transfer mortality with machine learning
title_fullStr Predicting ward transfer mortality with machine learning
title_full_unstemmed Predicting ward transfer mortality with machine learning
title_short Predicting ward transfer mortality with machine learning
title_sort predicting ward transfer mortality with machine learning
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10433377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37601037
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1191320
work_keys_str_mv AT lezamajosel predictingwardtransfermortalitywithmachinelearning
AT alterovitzgil predictingwardtransfermortalitywithmachinelearning
AT jakeycolleene predictingwardtransfermortalitywithmachinelearning
AT krausanal predictingwardtransfermortalitywithmachinelearning
AT kimmichaelj predictingwardtransfermortalitywithmachinelearning
AT borkowskiandrewa predictingwardtransfermortalitywithmachinelearning