Cargando…
A pediatric virtual care evaluation framework and its evolution using consensus methods
BACKGROUND: The use of virtual care has increased dramatically in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, yet evidence is lacking regarding the impact of virtual care on patient outcomes, particularly in pediatrics. A standardized evaluation approach is required to support the integration of virtual care...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10433580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37592246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04229-1 |
_version_ | 1785091680214450176 |
---|---|
author | Dulude, Catherine Sutherland, Stephanie Vanderhout, Shelley King, W. James Zuijdwijk, Caroline Major, Nathalie Audcent, Tobey Howley, Heather Cloutier, Paula Buba, Melanie Jain, Raagini Litwinska, Justyna Findlay, Leanne Malic, Claudia Macaulay, Karen Parker, Kasey Kouri, Christine Goldbloom, Ellen B. |
author_facet | Dulude, Catherine Sutherland, Stephanie Vanderhout, Shelley King, W. James Zuijdwijk, Caroline Major, Nathalie Audcent, Tobey Howley, Heather Cloutier, Paula Buba, Melanie Jain, Raagini Litwinska, Justyna Findlay, Leanne Malic, Claudia Macaulay, Karen Parker, Kasey Kouri, Christine Goldbloom, Ellen B. |
author_sort | Dulude, Catherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of virtual care has increased dramatically in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, yet evidence is lacking regarding the impact of virtual care on patient outcomes, particularly in pediatrics. A standardized evaluation approach is required to support the integration of virtual care into pediatric health care delivery programs. The objective of this work was to develop a comprehensive and structured framework for pediatric virtual care evaluation. This framework is intended to engage and guide care providers, health centres, and stakeholders towards the development of a standardized approach to the evaluation of pediatric virtual care. METHODS: We brought together a diverse multidisciplinary team, including pediatric clinicians, researchers, digital health leads and analysts, program leaders, a human factors engineer, a family advisor and our manager of health equity and diversity. The team reviewed the literature, including published evaluation frameworks, and used a consensus-based method to develop a virtual care evaluation framework applicable to a broad spectrum of pediatric virtual care programs. We used an iterative process to develop framework components, including domains and sub-domains, examples of evaluation questions, measures, and data sources. Team members met repeatedly over seven months to generate and provide feedback on all components of the framework, making revision as needed until consensus was reached. The framework was then applied to an existing virtual care program. RESULTS: The resulting framework includes four domains (health outcomes, health delivery, individual experience, and program implementation) and 19 sub-domains designed to support the development and evaluation of pediatric virtual care programs. We also developed guidance on how to use the framework and illustrate its utility by applying it to an existing pediatric virtual care program. CONCLUSIONS: This virtual care evaluation framework expands on previously developed frameworks by providing additional detail and a structure that supports practical application. It can be used to evaluate a wide range of pediatric virtual care programs in a standardized manner. Use of this comprehensive yet easy to use evaluation framework will inform appropriate implementation and integration of virtual care into routine practice and support its sustainability and continuous improvement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-023-04229-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10433580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104335802023-08-18 A pediatric virtual care evaluation framework and its evolution using consensus methods Dulude, Catherine Sutherland, Stephanie Vanderhout, Shelley King, W. James Zuijdwijk, Caroline Major, Nathalie Audcent, Tobey Howley, Heather Cloutier, Paula Buba, Melanie Jain, Raagini Litwinska, Justyna Findlay, Leanne Malic, Claudia Macaulay, Karen Parker, Kasey Kouri, Christine Goldbloom, Ellen B. BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of virtual care has increased dramatically in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, yet evidence is lacking regarding the impact of virtual care on patient outcomes, particularly in pediatrics. A standardized evaluation approach is required to support the integration of virtual care into pediatric health care delivery programs. The objective of this work was to develop a comprehensive and structured framework for pediatric virtual care evaluation. This framework is intended to engage and guide care providers, health centres, and stakeholders towards the development of a standardized approach to the evaluation of pediatric virtual care. METHODS: We brought together a diverse multidisciplinary team, including pediatric clinicians, researchers, digital health leads and analysts, program leaders, a human factors engineer, a family advisor and our manager of health equity and diversity. The team reviewed the literature, including published evaluation frameworks, and used a consensus-based method to develop a virtual care evaluation framework applicable to a broad spectrum of pediatric virtual care programs. We used an iterative process to develop framework components, including domains and sub-domains, examples of evaluation questions, measures, and data sources. Team members met repeatedly over seven months to generate and provide feedback on all components of the framework, making revision as needed until consensus was reached. The framework was then applied to an existing virtual care program. RESULTS: The resulting framework includes four domains (health outcomes, health delivery, individual experience, and program implementation) and 19 sub-domains designed to support the development and evaluation of pediatric virtual care programs. We also developed guidance on how to use the framework and illustrate its utility by applying it to an existing pediatric virtual care program. CONCLUSIONS: This virtual care evaluation framework expands on previously developed frameworks by providing additional detail and a structure that supports practical application. It can be used to evaluate a wide range of pediatric virtual care programs in a standardized manner. Use of this comprehensive yet easy to use evaluation framework will inform appropriate implementation and integration of virtual care into routine practice and support its sustainability and continuous improvement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-023-04229-1. BioMed Central 2023-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10433580/ /pubmed/37592246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04229-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dulude, Catherine Sutherland, Stephanie Vanderhout, Shelley King, W. James Zuijdwijk, Caroline Major, Nathalie Audcent, Tobey Howley, Heather Cloutier, Paula Buba, Melanie Jain, Raagini Litwinska, Justyna Findlay, Leanne Malic, Claudia Macaulay, Karen Parker, Kasey Kouri, Christine Goldbloom, Ellen B. A pediatric virtual care evaluation framework and its evolution using consensus methods |
title | A pediatric virtual care evaluation framework and its evolution using consensus methods |
title_full | A pediatric virtual care evaluation framework and its evolution using consensus methods |
title_fullStr | A pediatric virtual care evaluation framework and its evolution using consensus methods |
title_full_unstemmed | A pediatric virtual care evaluation framework and its evolution using consensus methods |
title_short | A pediatric virtual care evaluation framework and its evolution using consensus methods |
title_sort | pediatric virtual care evaluation framework and its evolution using consensus methods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10433580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37592246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04229-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duludecatherine apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT sutherlandstephanie apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT vanderhoutshelley apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT kingwjames apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT zuijdwijkcaroline apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT majornathalie apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT audcenttobey apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT howleyheather apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT cloutierpaula apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT bubamelanie apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT jainraagini apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT litwinskajustyna apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT findlayleanne apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT malicclaudia apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT macaulaykaren apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT parkerkasey apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT kourichristine apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT goldbloomellenb apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT duludecatherine pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT sutherlandstephanie pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT vanderhoutshelley pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT kingwjames pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT zuijdwijkcaroline pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT majornathalie pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT audcenttobey pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT howleyheather pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT cloutierpaula pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT bubamelanie pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT jainraagini pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT litwinskajustyna pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT findlayleanne pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT malicclaudia pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT macaulaykaren pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT parkerkasey pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT kourichristine pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods AT goldbloomellenb pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods |