Cargando…

A pediatric virtual care evaluation framework and its evolution using consensus methods

BACKGROUND: The use of virtual care has increased dramatically in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, yet evidence is lacking regarding the impact of virtual care on patient outcomes, particularly in pediatrics. A standardized evaluation approach is required to support the integration of virtual care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dulude, Catherine, Sutherland, Stephanie, Vanderhout, Shelley, King, W. James, Zuijdwijk, Caroline, Major, Nathalie, Audcent, Tobey, Howley, Heather, Cloutier, Paula, Buba, Melanie, Jain, Raagini, Litwinska, Justyna, Findlay, Leanne, Malic, Claudia, Macaulay, Karen, Parker, Kasey, Kouri, Christine, Goldbloom, Ellen B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10433580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37592246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04229-1
_version_ 1785091680214450176
author Dulude, Catherine
Sutherland, Stephanie
Vanderhout, Shelley
King, W. James
Zuijdwijk, Caroline
Major, Nathalie
Audcent, Tobey
Howley, Heather
Cloutier, Paula
Buba, Melanie
Jain, Raagini
Litwinska, Justyna
Findlay, Leanne
Malic, Claudia
Macaulay, Karen
Parker, Kasey
Kouri, Christine
Goldbloom, Ellen B.
author_facet Dulude, Catherine
Sutherland, Stephanie
Vanderhout, Shelley
King, W. James
Zuijdwijk, Caroline
Major, Nathalie
Audcent, Tobey
Howley, Heather
Cloutier, Paula
Buba, Melanie
Jain, Raagini
Litwinska, Justyna
Findlay, Leanne
Malic, Claudia
Macaulay, Karen
Parker, Kasey
Kouri, Christine
Goldbloom, Ellen B.
author_sort Dulude, Catherine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of virtual care has increased dramatically in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, yet evidence is lacking regarding the impact of virtual care on patient outcomes, particularly in pediatrics. A standardized evaluation approach is required to support the integration of virtual care into pediatric health care delivery programs. The objective of this work was to develop a comprehensive and structured framework for pediatric virtual care evaluation. This framework is intended to engage and guide care providers, health centres, and stakeholders towards the development of a standardized approach to the evaluation of pediatric virtual care. METHODS: We brought together a diverse multidisciplinary team, including pediatric clinicians, researchers, digital health leads and analysts, program leaders, a human factors engineer, a family advisor and our manager of health equity and diversity. The team reviewed the literature, including published evaluation frameworks, and used a consensus-based method to develop a virtual care evaluation framework applicable to a broad spectrum of pediatric virtual care programs. We used an iterative process to develop framework components, including domains and sub-domains, examples of evaluation questions, measures, and data sources. Team members met repeatedly over seven months to generate and provide feedback on all components of the framework, making revision as needed until consensus was reached. The framework was then applied to an existing virtual care program. RESULTS: The resulting framework includes four domains (health outcomes, health delivery, individual experience, and program implementation) and 19 sub-domains designed to support the development and evaluation of pediatric virtual care programs. We also developed guidance on how to use the framework and illustrate its utility by applying it to an existing pediatric virtual care program. CONCLUSIONS: This virtual care evaluation framework expands on previously developed frameworks by providing additional detail and a structure that supports practical application. It can be used to evaluate a wide range of pediatric virtual care programs in a standardized manner. Use of this comprehensive yet easy to use evaluation framework will inform appropriate implementation and integration of virtual care into routine practice and support its sustainability and continuous improvement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-023-04229-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10433580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104335802023-08-18 A pediatric virtual care evaluation framework and its evolution using consensus methods Dulude, Catherine Sutherland, Stephanie Vanderhout, Shelley King, W. James Zuijdwijk, Caroline Major, Nathalie Audcent, Tobey Howley, Heather Cloutier, Paula Buba, Melanie Jain, Raagini Litwinska, Justyna Findlay, Leanne Malic, Claudia Macaulay, Karen Parker, Kasey Kouri, Christine Goldbloom, Ellen B. BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of virtual care has increased dramatically in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, yet evidence is lacking regarding the impact of virtual care on patient outcomes, particularly in pediatrics. A standardized evaluation approach is required to support the integration of virtual care into pediatric health care delivery programs. The objective of this work was to develop a comprehensive and structured framework for pediatric virtual care evaluation. This framework is intended to engage and guide care providers, health centres, and stakeholders towards the development of a standardized approach to the evaluation of pediatric virtual care. METHODS: We brought together a diverse multidisciplinary team, including pediatric clinicians, researchers, digital health leads and analysts, program leaders, a human factors engineer, a family advisor and our manager of health equity and diversity. The team reviewed the literature, including published evaluation frameworks, and used a consensus-based method to develop a virtual care evaluation framework applicable to a broad spectrum of pediatric virtual care programs. We used an iterative process to develop framework components, including domains and sub-domains, examples of evaluation questions, measures, and data sources. Team members met repeatedly over seven months to generate and provide feedback on all components of the framework, making revision as needed until consensus was reached. The framework was then applied to an existing virtual care program. RESULTS: The resulting framework includes four domains (health outcomes, health delivery, individual experience, and program implementation) and 19 sub-domains designed to support the development and evaluation of pediatric virtual care programs. We also developed guidance on how to use the framework and illustrate its utility by applying it to an existing pediatric virtual care program. CONCLUSIONS: This virtual care evaluation framework expands on previously developed frameworks by providing additional detail and a structure that supports practical application. It can be used to evaluate a wide range of pediatric virtual care programs in a standardized manner. Use of this comprehensive yet easy to use evaluation framework will inform appropriate implementation and integration of virtual care into routine practice and support its sustainability and continuous improvement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-023-04229-1. BioMed Central 2023-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10433580/ /pubmed/37592246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04229-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dulude, Catherine
Sutherland, Stephanie
Vanderhout, Shelley
King, W. James
Zuijdwijk, Caroline
Major, Nathalie
Audcent, Tobey
Howley, Heather
Cloutier, Paula
Buba, Melanie
Jain, Raagini
Litwinska, Justyna
Findlay, Leanne
Malic, Claudia
Macaulay, Karen
Parker, Kasey
Kouri, Christine
Goldbloom, Ellen B.
A pediatric virtual care evaluation framework and its evolution using consensus methods
title A pediatric virtual care evaluation framework and its evolution using consensus methods
title_full A pediatric virtual care evaluation framework and its evolution using consensus methods
title_fullStr A pediatric virtual care evaluation framework and its evolution using consensus methods
title_full_unstemmed A pediatric virtual care evaluation framework and its evolution using consensus methods
title_short A pediatric virtual care evaluation framework and its evolution using consensus methods
title_sort pediatric virtual care evaluation framework and its evolution using consensus methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10433580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37592246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04229-1
work_keys_str_mv AT duludecatherine apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT sutherlandstephanie apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT vanderhoutshelley apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT kingwjames apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT zuijdwijkcaroline apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT majornathalie apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT audcenttobey apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT howleyheather apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT cloutierpaula apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT bubamelanie apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT jainraagini apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT litwinskajustyna apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT findlayleanne apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT malicclaudia apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT macaulaykaren apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT parkerkasey apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT kourichristine apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT goldbloomellenb apediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT duludecatherine pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT sutherlandstephanie pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT vanderhoutshelley pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT kingwjames pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT zuijdwijkcaroline pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT majornathalie pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT audcenttobey pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT howleyheather pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT cloutierpaula pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT bubamelanie pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT jainraagini pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT litwinskajustyna pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT findlayleanne pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT malicclaudia pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT macaulaykaren pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT parkerkasey pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT kourichristine pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods
AT goldbloomellenb pediatricvirtualcareevaluationframeworkanditsevolutionusingconsensusmethods