Cargando…
Four-parameter analysis in modified Rotarod test for detecting minor motor deficits in mice
BACKGROUND: The Rotarod test with commercial apparatus is widely used to assess locomotor performance, balance and motor learning as well as the deficits resulting from diverse neurological disorders in laboratory rodents due to its simplicity and objectivity. Traditionally, the test ends when roden...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10433596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37592249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-023-01679-y |
_version_ | 1785091684118298624 |
---|---|
author | Shan, Hui-Min Maurer, Michael A. Schwab, Martin E. |
author_facet | Shan, Hui-Min Maurer, Michael A. Schwab, Martin E. |
author_sort | Shan, Hui-Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Rotarod test with commercial apparatus is widely used to assess locomotor performance, balance and motor learning as well as the deficits resulting from diverse neurological disorders in laboratory rodents due to its simplicity and objectivity. Traditionally, the test ends when rodents drop from the accelerating, turning rod, and the only parameter used commonly is “latency to fall”. The values of individual animals can often vary greatly. RESULTS: In the present study, we established a procedure for mice with 4 consecutive days of training with 4 trials per day and modified the testing procedure by placing the mice back on the rod repeatedly after each fall until the trial ends (5 min). Data from the fourth training day as baseline results showed that the second, third and fourth trial were more consistent than the first, probably due to habituation or learning. There was no difference between the second, third and fourth trial, two trials may be sufficient in testing. We also introduced 3 additional read-outs: Longest duration on the rod (s), Maximal distance covered (cm), and Number of falls to better evaluate the motor capacity over the 5 min of testing. We then used this 4-parameter analysis to capture the motor deficits of mice with mild to moderate traumatic brain injuries (by a weight dropping on the skull (Marmarou model)). We found that normalization of data to individual baseline performance was needed to reduce individual differences, and 4 trials were more sensitive than two to show motor deficits. The parameter of Maximal distance was the best in detecting statistically significant long-term motor deficits. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that by making adjustments to the protocol and employing a more refined analysis, it is possible to expand a widely used routine behavioral test with additional accessible parameters that detect relevant deficits in a model of mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. The modified Rotarod test maybe a valuable tool for better preclinical evaluations of drugs and therapies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12915-023-01679-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10433596 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104335962023-08-18 Four-parameter analysis in modified Rotarod test for detecting minor motor deficits in mice Shan, Hui-Min Maurer, Michael A. Schwab, Martin E. BMC Biol Methodology Article BACKGROUND: The Rotarod test with commercial apparatus is widely used to assess locomotor performance, balance and motor learning as well as the deficits resulting from diverse neurological disorders in laboratory rodents due to its simplicity and objectivity. Traditionally, the test ends when rodents drop from the accelerating, turning rod, and the only parameter used commonly is “latency to fall”. The values of individual animals can often vary greatly. RESULTS: In the present study, we established a procedure for mice with 4 consecutive days of training with 4 trials per day and modified the testing procedure by placing the mice back on the rod repeatedly after each fall until the trial ends (5 min). Data from the fourth training day as baseline results showed that the second, third and fourth trial were more consistent than the first, probably due to habituation or learning. There was no difference between the second, third and fourth trial, two trials may be sufficient in testing. We also introduced 3 additional read-outs: Longest duration on the rod (s), Maximal distance covered (cm), and Number of falls to better evaluate the motor capacity over the 5 min of testing. We then used this 4-parameter analysis to capture the motor deficits of mice with mild to moderate traumatic brain injuries (by a weight dropping on the skull (Marmarou model)). We found that normalization of data to individual baseline performance was needed to reduce individual differences, and 4 trials were more sensitive than two to show motor deficits. The parameter of Maximal distance was the best in detecting statistically significant long-term motor deficits. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that by making adjustments to the protocol and employing a more refined analysis, it is possible to expand a widely used routine behavioral test with additional accessible parameters that detect relevant deficits in a model of mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. The modified Rotarod test maybe a valuable tool for better preclinical evaluations of drugs and therapies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12915-023-01679-y. BioMed Central 2023-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10433596/ /pubmed/37592249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-023-01679-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Shan, Hui-Min Maurer, Michael A. Schwab, Martin E. Four-parameter analysis in modified Rotarod test for detecting minor motor deficits in mice |
title | Four-parameter analysis in modified Rotarod test for detecting minor motor deficits in mice |
title_full | Four-parameter analysis in modified Rotarod test for detecting minor motor deficits in mice |
title_fullStr | Four-parameter analysis in modified Rotarod test for detecting minor motor deficits in mice |
title_full_unstemmed | Four-parameter analysis in modified Rotarod test for detecting minor motor deficits in mice |
title_short | Four-parameter analysis in modified Rotarod test for detecting minor motor deficits in mice |
title_sort | four-parameter analysis in modified rotarod test for detecting minor motor deficits in mice |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10433596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37592249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-023-01679-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shanhuimin fourparameteranalysisinmodifiedrotarodtestfordetectingminormotordeficitsinmice AT maurermichaela fourparameteranalysisinmodifiedrotarodtestfordetectingminormotordeficitsinmice AT schwabmartine fourparameteranalysisinmodifiedrotarodtestfordetectingminormotordeficitsinmice |