Cargando…

Transition to Psychosis in Individuals at Clinical High Risk: Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Estimating the current likelihood of transitioning from a clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) to psychosis holds paramount importance for preventive care and applied research. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to quantitatively examine the consistency and magnitude of transition risk to psy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salazar De Pablo, G., Radua, J., Bonoldi, I., Arienty, V., Besana, F., Cabras, A., Catalan, A., Fusar-Poli, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10434364/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.797
_version_ 1785091871224102912
author Salazar De Pablo, G.
Radua, J.
Bonoldi, I.
Arienty, V.
Besana, F.
Cabras, A.
Catalan, A.
Fusar-Poli, P.
author_facet Salazar De Pablo, G.
Radua, J.
Bonoldi, I.
Arienty, V.
Besana, F.
Cabras, A.
Catalan, A.
Fusar-Poli, P.
author_sort Salazar De Pablo, G.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Estimating the current likelihood of transitioning from a clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) to psychosis holds paramount importance for preventive care and applied research. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to quantitatively examine the consistency and magnitude of transition risk to psychosis in individuals at CHR-P. METHODS: This meta-analysis is compliant with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guidelines. PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for longitudinal studies reporting transition risks in individuals at CHR-P. Primary effect size was cumulative risk of transition to psychosis at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, and more than 4 years’ follow-up, estimated using the numbers of individuals at CHR-P transitioning to psychosis at each time point. Random-effects meta-analysis were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 130 studies and 9222 individuals at CHR-P were included. The mean (SD) age was 20.3 (4.4) years, and 5100 individuals (55.3%) were male. The cumulative transition risk was 9% (95% CI = 7-10% k = 37; n = 6485) at 0.5 years, 15% (95% CI = 13-16%; k = 53; n = 7907) at 1 year, 20% (95% CI = 17%-22%; k = 30; n = 5488) at 1.5 years, 19% (95% CI = 17-22%; k = 44; n = 7351) at 2 years, 25% (95% CI, 21-29%) at 2.5 years, 25% (95% CI = 22-29%; k = 29; n = 4029) at 3 years, 27% (95% CI = 23-30%; k = 16; n = 2926) at 4 years, and 28% (95% CI = 20-37%; k = 14; n = 2301) at more than 4 years. Meta-regressions showed that a lower proportion of female individuals (β = -0.02; 95% CI, -0.04 to -0.01) and a higher proportion of brief limited intermittent psychotic symptoms (β = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01-0.03) were associated with an increase in transition risk. Other predictors were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Heterogeneity across the studies was high (I2 range, 77.91% to 95.73%). CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, 25% of individuals at CHR-P developed psychosis within 3 years. Transition risk continued increasing in the long term. Extended clinical monitoring and preventive care may be beneficial in this patient population. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST: None Declared
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10434364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104343642023-08-18 Transition to Psychosis in Individuals at Clinical High Risk: Meta-analysis Salazar De Pablo, G. Radua, J. Bonoldi, I. Arienty, V. Besana, F. Cabras, A. Catalan, A. Fusar-Poli, P. Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: Estimating the current likelihood of transitioning from a clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) to psychosis holds paramount importance for preventive care and applied research. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to quantitatively examine the consistency and magnitude of transition risk to psychosis in individuals at CHR-P. METHODS: This meta-analysis is compliant with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guidelines. PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for longitudinal studies reporting transition risks in individuals at CHR-P. Primary effect size was cumulative risk of transition to psychosis at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, and more than 4 years’ follow-up, estimated using the numbers of individuals at CHR-P transitioning to psychosis at each time point. Random-effects meta-analysis were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 130 studies and 9222 individuals at CHR-P were included. The mean (SD) age was 20.3 (4.4) years, and 5100 individuals (55.3%) were male. The cumulative transition risk was 9% (95% CI = 7-10% k = 37; n = 6485) at 0.5 years, 15% (95% CI = 13-16%; k = 53; n = 7907) at 1 year, 20% (95% CI = 17%-22%; k = 30; n = 5488) at 1.5 years, 19% (95% CI = 17-22%; k = 44; n = 7351) at 2 years, 25% (95% CI, 21-29%) at 2.5 years, 25% (95% CI = 22-29%; k = 29; n = 4029) at 3 years, 27% (95% CI = 23-30%; k = 16; n = 2926) at 4 years, and 28% (95% CI = 20-37%; k = 14; n = 2301) at more than 4 years. Meta-regressions showed that a lower proportion of female individuals (β = -0.02; 95% CI, -0.04 to -0.01) and a higher proportion of brief limited intermittent psychotic symptoms (β = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01-0.03) were associated with an increase in transition risk. Other predictors were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Heterogeneity across the studies was high (I2 range, 77.91% to 95.73%). CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, 25% of individuals at CHR-P developed psychosis within 3 years. Transition risk continued increasing in the long term. Extended clinical monitoring and preventive care may be beneficial in this patient population. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST: None Declared Cambridge University Press 2023-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10434364/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.797 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Salazar De Pablo, G.
Radua, J.
Bonoldi, I.
Arienty, V.
Besana, F.
Cabras, A.
Catalan, A.
Fusar-Poli, P.
Transition to Psychosis in Individuals at Clinical High Risk: Meta-analysis
title Transition to Psychosis in Individuals at Clinical High Risk: Meta-analysis
title_full Transition to Psychosis in Individuals at Clinical High Risk: Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Transition to Psychosis in Individuals at Clinical High Risk: Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Transition to Psychosis in Individuals at Clinical High Risk: Meta-analysis
title_short Transition to Psychosis in Individuals at Clinical High Risk: Meta-analysis
title_sort transition to psychosis in individuals at clinical high risk: meta-analysis
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10434364/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.797
work_keys_str_mv AT salazardepablog transitiontopsychosisinindividualsatclinicalhighriskmetaanalysis
AT raduaj transitiontopsychosisinindividualsatclinicalhighriskmetaanalysis
AT bonoldii transitiontopsychosisinindividualsatclinicalhighriskmetaanalysis
AT arientyv transitiontopsychosisinindividualsatclinicalhighriskmetaanalysis
AT besanaf transitiontopsychosisinindividualsatclinicalhighriskmetaanalysis
AT cabrasa transitiontopsychosisinindividualsatclinicalhighriskmetaanalysis
AT catalana transitiontopsychosisinindividualsatclinicalhighriskmetaanalysis
AT fusarpolip transitiontopsychosisinindividualsatclinicalhighriskmetaanalysis