Cargando…

Two-year real-world outcome data from a single tertiary centre shows reduced ustekinumab persistence in a non-bio-naïve Crohn’s disease cohort with penetrating disease, -ostomies and sarcopenia

BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab was approved in 2016 for the treatment of moderate–severe Crohn’s disease (CD). Clinical trials and real-world studies have suggested ustekinumab to be a safe and effective treatment; however, studies to date infrequently use imaging techniques to predict response to biologic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inniss, Saskia, Fragkos, Konstantinos C., Whitley, Lisa, Wimpory, Rachel, Rebello, Eleanor, Lisboa, Ana, Khetan, Tanvi, Hassan, Jasmine, Simpson, Kate, Bhagwanani, Anisha, Vega, Roser, Parisi, Ioanna, Harrow, Paul, Seward, Edward, McCartney, Sara, Bloom, Stuart, Smith, Andrew M., Plumb, Andrew, Rahman, Farooq Z.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10434845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37601038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406223231189072
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab was approved in 2016 for the treatment of moderate–severe Crohn’s disease (CD). Clinical trials and real-world studies have suggested ustekinumab to be a safe and effective treatment; however, studies to date infrequently use imaging techniques to predict response to biologics in CD. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the 2-year real-world effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in a tertiary CD cohort with the use of novel imaging techniques. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected between 2016 and 2021. Study end points included ustekinumab persistence, biological and/or clinical response and remission at 12, 18 and 24 months. Statistical analysis included demographic and inferential analyses. RESULTS: In all, 131 CD patients [57.3% female, median age of 26.0 (21.0–37.0)] were included. Patients were non-bio naïve, and the majority received ustekinumab as third- or fourth-line treatment. At 24 months, 61.0% (80/131) persisted with ustekinumab [52.7% (69/131) steroid free]. Clinical response was reported in 55.2% (37/67), clinical remission in 85.7% (57/67), biological response in 46.8% (22/47) and biological remission in 31.9% (15/47) of patients at 24 months. The low outcome numbers were attributable to missing data. Improvements in routine disease markers, including C-reactive protein and Harvey–Bradshaw Index, were also reflected in magnetic resonance imaging-derived disease scores. The presence of penetrating CD, an -ostomy and sarcopenia were all predictors of poorer ustekinumab outcomes (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ustekinumab is effective in non-bio-naïve CD patients with non-stricturing, non-penetrating disease with an unremarkable safety profile but may be less effective in those with penetrating disease, -ostomies and sarcopenia.