Cargando…
Evaluation of Xpert MTB/XDR test for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to first and second-line drugs in Uganda
BACKGROUND: Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis (DR-TB) is one of the major challenges to TB control. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a blinded, laboratory-based cross-sectional study using sputum samples or culture isolates. Samples were from patients with rifampicin-resistant—TB and/or with high risk for iso...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10434885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37590288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284545 |
_version_ | 1785092004910202880 |
---|---|
author | Katamba, Achilles Ssengooba, Willy Sserubiri, James Semugenze, Derrick Kasule, George William Nyombi, Abdunoor Byaruhanga, Raymond Turyahabwe, Stavia Joloba, Moses L. |
author_facet | Katamba, Achilles Ssengooba, Willy Sserubiri, James Semugenze, Derrick Kasule, George William Nyombi, Abdunoor Byaruhanga, Raymond Turyahabwe, Stavia Joloba, Moses L. |
author_sort | Katamba, Achilles |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis (DR-TB) is one of the major challenges to TB control. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a blinded, laboratory-based cross-sectional study using sputum samples or culture isolates. Samples were from patients with rifampicin-resistant—TB and/or with high risk for isoniazid (INH) resistance and/or 2(nd) line fluoroquinolones (FQ) and injectable agents (IAs). The diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert(®) MTB/XDR test was compared to MGIT960 and the Hain Genotype(®) MTBDRplus and MDRsl assays (LPA) as reference DST methods. Factors for laboratory uptake of the Xpert(®) MTB/XDR test were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 100 stored sputum samples included in this study, 65/99 (65.6%) were resistant to INH, 5/100 (5.0%) were resistant to FQ and none were resistant to IAs using MGIT960. The sensitivity and specificity, n (%; 95% Confidence Interval, CI) of Xpert(®) MTB/XDR test for; INH was 58 (89.2; 79.1–95.5) and 30 (88.2; 72.5–96.6) and for FQ; 4 (80.0; 28.3–99.4) and 95 (100; 96.2–100), respectively. Using LPA as a reference standard, a total of 52/98 (53.1%) were resistant to INH, 3/100 (3.0%) to FQ, and none to IA. The sensitivity and specificity, n (%; 95%CI) of Xpert(®) MTB/XDR test compared to LPA for; INH was 50 (96.1; 86.7–99.5) and 34 (74.0; 58.8–85.7) for FQ 3 (100; 29.2–100) and 96 (99.0; 94.3–99.9) respectively. The factors for laboratory uptake and roll-out of the Xpert(®) MTB/XDR test included: no training needed for technicians with, and one day for those without, previous Xpert-ultra experience, recording and reporting needs were not different from those of Xpert-ultra, the error rate was 4/100 (4%), one (1%) indeterminate rate and test turn-around-time were 1hr/45 minutes. CONCLUSION: There is high sensitivity and specificity of Xpert(®) MTB/XDR test for isoniazid and fluoroquinolones. There are acceptable Xpert(®) MTB/XDR test attributes for the test uptake and roll-out. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10434885 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104348852023-08-18 Evaluation of Xpert MTB/XDR test for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to first and second-line drugs in Uganda Katamba, Achilles Ssengooba, Willy Sserubiri, James Semugenze, Derrick Kasule, George William Nyombi, Abdunoor Byaruhanga, Raymond Turyahabwe, Stavia Joloba, Moses L. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis (DR-TB) is one of the major challenges to TB control. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a blinded, laboratory-based cross-sectional study using sputum samples or culture isolates. Samples were from patients with rifampicin-resistant—TB and/or with high risk for isoniazid (INH) resistance and/or 2(nd) line fluoroquinolones (FQ) and injectable agents (IAs). The diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert(®) MTB/XDR test was compared to MGIT960 and the Hain Genotype(®) MTBDRplus and MDRsl assays (LPA) as reference DST methods. Factors for laboratory uptake of the Xpert(®) MTB/XDR test were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 100 stored sputum samples included in this study, 65/99 (65.6%) were resistant to INH, 5/100 (5.0%) were resistant to FQ and none were resistant to IAs using MGIT960. The sensitivity and specificity, n (%; 95% Confidence Interval, CI) of Xpert(®) MTB/XDR test for; INH was 58 (89.2; 79.1–95.5) and 30 (88.2; 72.5–96.6) and for FQ; 4 (80.0; 28.3–99.4) and 95 (100; 96.2–100), respectively. Using LPA as a reference standard, a total of 52/98 (53.1%) were resistant to INH, 3/100 (3.0%) to FQ, and none to IA. The sensitivity and specificity, n (%; 95%CI) of Xpert(®) MTB/XDR test compared to LPA for; INH was 50 (96.1; 86.7–99.5) and 34 (74.0; 58.8–85.7) for FQ 3 (100; 29.2–100) and 96 (99.0; 94.3–99.9) respectively. The factors for laboratory uptake and roll-out of the Xpert(®) MTB/XDR test included: no training needed for technicians with, and one day for those without, previous Xpert-ultra experience, recording and reporting needs were not different from those of Xpert-ultra, the error rate was 4/100 (4%), one (1%) indeterminate rate and test turn-around-time were 1hr/45 minutes. CONCLUSION: There is high sensitivity and specificity of Xpert(®) MTB/XDR test for isoniazid and fluoroquinolones. There are acceptable Xpert(®) MTB/XDR test attributes for the test uptake and roll-out. Public Library of Science 2023-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10434885/ /pubmed/37590288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284545 Text en © 2023 Katamba et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Katamba, Achilles Ssengooba, Willy Sserubiri, James Semugenze, Derrick Kasule, George William Nyombi, Abdunoor Byaruhanga, Raymond Turyahabwe, Stavia Joloba, Moses L. Evaluation of Xpert MTB/XDR test for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to first and second-line drugs in Uganda |
title | Evaluation of Xpert MTB/XDR test for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to first and second-line drugs in Uganda |
title_full | Evaluation of Xpert MTB/XDR test for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to first and second-line drugs in Uganda |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Xpert MTB/XDR test for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to first and second-line drugs in Uganda |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Xpert MTB/XDR test for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to first and second-line drugs in Uganda |
title_short | Evaluation of Xpert MTB/XDR test for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to first and second-line drugs in Uganda |
title_sort | evaluation of xpert mtb/xdr test for susceptibility testing of mycobacterium tuberculosis to first and second-line drugs in uganda |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10434885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37590288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284545 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katambaachilles evaluationofxpertmtbxdrtestforsusceptibilitytestingofmycobacteriumtuberculosistofirstandsecondlinedrugsinuganda AT ssengoobawilly evaluationofxpertmtbxdrtestforsusceptibilitytestingofmycobacteriumtuberculosistofirstandsecondlinedrugsinuganda AT sserubirijames evaluationofxpertmtbxdrtestforsusceptibilitytestingofmycobacteriumtuberculosistofirstandsecondlinedrugsinuganda AT semugenzederrick evaluationofxpertmtbxdrtestforsusceptibilitytestingofmycobacteriumtuberculosistofirstandsecondlinedrugsinuganda AT kasulegeorgewilliam evaluationofxpertmtbxdrtestforsusceptibilitytestingofmycobacteriumtuberculosistofirstandsecondlinedrugsinuganda AT nyombiabdunoor evaluationofxpertmtbxdrtestforsusceptibilitytestingofmycobacteriumtuberculosistofirstandsecondlinedrugsinuganda AT byaruhangaraymond evaluationofxpertmtbxdrtestforsusceptibilitytestingofmycobacteriumtuberculosistofirstandsecondlinedrugsinuganda AT turyahabwestavia evaluationofxpertmtbxdrtestforsusceptibilitytestingofmycobacteriumtuberculosistofirstandsecondlinedrugsinuganda AT jolobamosesl evaluationofxpertmtbxdrtestforsusceptibilitytestingofmycobacteriumtuberculosistofirstandsecondlinedrugsinuganda |