Cargando…

Differences of oribatid mite community and trophic structure between karst caves and surface different moss habitats

In order to reveal the community characteristics and trophic structure of oribatid mites in different moss habitats in karst caves, the oribatid mites in the moss habitats of ground (GD), understory (US), cave wall (CW), surface shrub (SB) and farmland (FL) outside the cave were collected in October...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gong, Tong, Yin, Xiumei, Liu, Wenjun, Chen, Hu, Shi, Zheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10434907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37590253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290144
_version_ 1785092011367333888
author Gong, Tong
Yin, Xiumei
Liu, Wenjun
Chen, Hu
Shi, Zheng
author_facet Gong, Tong
Yin, Xiumei
Liu, Wenjun
Chen, Hu
Shi, Zheng
author_sort Gong, Tong
collection PubMed
description In order to reveal the community characteristics and trophic structure of oribatid mites in different moss habitats in karst caves, the oribatid mites in the moss habitats of ground (GD), understory (US), cave wall (CW), surface shrub (SB) and farmland (FL) outside the cave were collected in October 2021. Through the identification and data analysis of oribatid mites, 2352 oribatid mites were found, belonging to 45 families and 72 genera, most of which were Gymnonota. The family number, genus number, individual number, individual density, dominant genus composition, community diversity, community similarity, MGP (Analysis methods for ecological groups of oribatid mites) ecological group of oribatid mites and trophic structure of oribatid mites in different moss were analyzed. The results showed that: (1) The number of families, genera, individuals, and individual density of SB and FL are higher than those of the other three habitats; (2) Platyliodes, Oppiella, Tectocepheus, Scutovertex, Scheloribates and Trichogalumna are the dominant genera of the oribatid mites in the cave moss habitat, among them, Tectocepheus and Trichogaluna have the most obvious advantages; (3) The diversity index of shrub (SB) was higher than that of other four habitats; Similarity between ground and cave wall, shrub and farmland is high; (4) The MGP ecological group of oribatid mites in different habitats is dominated by O type (Overall type belongs to MGP analysis results, 20%≤M,G,P≤50%), and a total of 42 genera of oribatid mites preliminarily constitute the trophic structure of oribatid mites in the cave moss habitat. Based on the above results, it can be concluded that there are differences in the community structure of oribatid mites in different moss habitats in the study area, and the use of dominant genera of mites can preliminarily indicate the environmental conditions of different moss habitats. This study enriches the study of mites in karst cave mosses, and can provide theoretical significance for the protection of cave biodiversity in karst areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10434907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104349072023-08-18 Differences of oribatid mite community and trophic structure between karst caves and surface different moss habitats Gong, Tong Yin, Xiumei Liu, Wenjun Chen, Hu Shi, Zheng PLoS One Research Article In order to reveal the community characteristics and trophic structure of oribatid mites in different moss habitats in karst caves, the oribatid mites in the moss habitats of ground (GD), understory (US), cave wall (CW), surface shrub (SB) and farmland (FL) outside the cave were collected in October 2021. Through the identification and data analysis of oribatid mites, 2352 oribatid mites were found, belonging to 45 families and 72 genera, most of which were Gymnonota. The family number, genus number, individual number, individual density, dominant genus composition, community diversity, community similarity, MGP (Analysis methods for ecological groups of oribatid mites) ecological group of oribatid mites and trophic structure of oribatid mites in different moss were analyzed. The results showed that: (1) The number of families, genera, individuals, and individual density of SB and FL are higher than those of the other three habitats; (2) Platyliodes, Oppiella, Tectocepheus, Scutovertex, Scheloribates and Trichogalumna are the dominant genera of the oribatid mites in the cave moss habitat, among them, Tectocepheus and Trichogaluna have the most obvious advantages; (3) The diversity index of shrub (SB) was higher than that of other four habitats; Similarity between ground and cave wall, shrub and farmland is high; (4) The MGP ecological group of oribatid mites in different habitats is dominated by O type (Overall type belongs to MGP analysis results, 20%≤M,G,P≤50%), and a total of 42 genera of oribatid mites preliminarily constitute the trophic structure of oribatid mites in the cave moss habitat. Based on the above results, it can be concluded that there are differences in the community structure of oribatid mites in different moss habitats in the study area, and the use of dominant genera of mites can preliminarily indicate the environmental conditions of different moss habitats. This study enriches the study of mites in karst cave mosses, and can provide theoretical significance for the protection of cave biodiversity in karst areas. Public Library of Science 2023-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10434907/ /pubmed/37590253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290144 Text en © 2023 Gong et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gong, Tong
Yin, Xiumei
Liu, Wenjun
Chen, Hu
Shi, Zheng
Differences of oribatid mite community and trophic structure between karst caves and surface different moss habitats
title Differences of oribatid mite community and trophic structure between karst caves and surface different moss habitats
title_full Differences of oribatid mite community and trophic structure between karst caves and surface different moss habitats
title_fullStr Differences of oribatid mite community and trophic structure between karst caves and surface different moss habitats
title_full_unstemmed Differences of oribatid mite community and trophic structure between karst caves and surface different moss habitats
title_short Differences of oribatid mite community and trophic structure between karst caves and surface different moss habitats
title_sort differences of oribatid mite community and trophic structure between karst caves and surface different moss habitats
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10434907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37590253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290144
work_keys_str_mv AT gongtong differencesoforibatidmitecommunityandtrophicstructurebetweenkarstcavesandsurfacedifferentmosshabitats
AT yinxiumei differencesoforibatidmitecommunityandtrophicstructurebetweenkarstcavesandsurfacedifferentmosshabitats
AT liuwenjun differencesoforibatidmitecommunityandtrophicstructurebetweenkarstcavesandsurfacedifferentmosshabitats
AT chenhu differencesoforibatidmitecommunityandtrophicstructurebetweenkarstcavesandsurfacedifferentmosshabitats
AT shizheng differencesoforibatidmitecommunityandtrophicstructurebetweenkarstcavesandsurfacedifferentmosshabitats