Cargando…

A Practical Approach to Predicting Surgical Site Infection Risk Among Patients Before Leaving the Operating Room

A surgical site infection (SSI) prediction model that identifies at-risk patients before leaving the operating room can support efforts to improve patient safety. In this study, eight pre-operative and five perioperative patient- and procedure-specific characteristics were tested with two scoring al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woods, Michael S, Ekstrom, Valerie, Darer, Jonathan D, Tonkel, Jacqueline, Twick, Isabell, Ramshaw, Bruce, Nissan, Aviram, Assaf, Dan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10434973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37602114
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42085
_version_ 1785092028301836288
author Woods, Michael S
Ekstrom, Valerie
Darer, Jonathan D
Tonkel, Jacqueline
Twick, Isabell
Ramshaw, Bruce
Nissan, Aviram
Assaf, Dan
author_facet Woods, Michael S
Ekstrom, Valerie
Darer, Jonathan D
Tonkel, Jacqueline
Twick, Isabell
Ramshaw, Bruce
Nissan, Aviram
Assaf, Dan
author_sort Woods, Michael S
collection PubMed
description A surgical site infection (SSI) prediction model that identifies at-risk patients before leaving the operating room can support efforts to improve patient safety. In this study, eight pre-operative and five perioperative patient- and procedure-specific characteristics were tested with two scoring algorithms: 1) count of positive factors (manual), and 2) logistic regression model (automated). Models were developed and validated using data from 3,440 general and oncologic surgical patients. In the automated algorithm, two pre-operative (procedure urgency, odds ratio [OR]: 1.7; and antibiotic administration >2 hours before incision, OR: 1.6) and three intraoperative risk factors (open surgery [OR: 3.7], high-risk procedure [OR: 3.5], and operative time OR: [2.6]) were associated with SSI risk. The manual score achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.831 and the automated algorithm achieved AUC of 0.868. Open surgery had the greatest impact on prediction, followed by procedure risk, operative time, and procedure urgency. At 80% sensitivity, the manual and automated scores achieved a positive predictive value of 16.3% and 22.0%, respectively. Both the manual and automated SSI risk prediction algorithms accurately identified at-risk populations. Use of either model before the patient leaves the operating room can provide the clinical team with evidence-based guidance to consider proactive intervention to prevent SSIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10434973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104349732023-08-18 A Practical Approach to Predicting Surgical Site Infection Risk Among Patients Before Leaving the Operating Room Woods, Michael S Ekstrom, Valerie Darer, Jonathan D Tonkel, Jacqueline Twick, Isabell Ramshaw, Bruce Nissan, Aviram Assaf, Dan Cureus General Surgery A surgical site infection (SSI) prediction model that identifies at-risk patients before leaving the operating room can support efforts to improve patient safety. In this study, eight pre-operative and five perioperative patient- and procedure-specific characteristics were tested with two scoring algorithms: 1) count of positive factors (manual), and 2) logistic regression model (automated). Models were developed and validated using data from 3,440 general and oncologic surgical patients. In the automated algorithm, two pre-operative (procedure urgency, odds ratio [OR]: 1.7; and antibiotic administration >2 hours before incision, OR: 1.6) and three intraoperative risk factors (open surgery [OR: 3.7], high-risk procedure [OR: 3.5], and operative time OR: [2.6]) were associated with SSI risk. The manual score achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.831 and the automated algorithm achieved AUC of 0.868. Open surgery had the greatest impact on prediction, followed by procedure risk, operative time, and procedure urgency. At 80% sensitivity, the manual and automated scores achieved a positive predictive value of 16.3% and 22.0%, respectively. Both the manual and automated SSI risk prediction algorithms accurately identified at-risk populations. Use of either model before the patient leaves the operating room can provide the clinical team with evidence-based guidance to consider proactive intervention to prevent SSIs. Cureus 2023-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10434973/ /pubmed/37602114 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42085 Text en Copyright © 2023, Woods et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle General Surgery
Woods, Michael S
Ekstrom, Valerie
Darer, Jonathan D
Tonkel, Jacqueline
Twick, Isabell
Ramshaw, Bruce
Nissan, Aviram
Assaf, Dan
A Practical Approach to Predicting Surgical Site Infection Risk Among Patients Before Leaving the Operating Room
title A Practical Approach to Predicting Surgical Site Infection Risk Among Patients Before Leaving the Operating Room
title_full A Practical Approach to Predicting Surgical Site Infection Risk Among Patients Before Leaving the Operating Room
title_fullStr A Practical Approach to Predicting Surgical Site Infection Risk Among Patients Before Leaving the Operating Room
title_full_unstemmed A Practical Approach to Predicting Surgical Site Infection Risk Among Patients Before Leaving the Operating Room
title_short A Practical Approach to Predicting Surgical Site Infection Risk Among Patients Before Leaving the Operating Room
title_sort practical approach to predicting surgical site infection risk among patients before leaving the operating room
topic General Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10434973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37602114
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42085
work_keys_str_mv AT woodsmichaels apracticalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom
AT ekstromvalerie apracticalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom
AT darerjonathand apracticalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom
AT tonkeljacqueline apracticalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom
AT twickisabell apracticalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom
AT ramshawbruce apracticalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom
AT nissanaviram apracticalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom
AT assafdan apracticalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom
AT woodsmichaels practicalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom
AT ekstromvalerie practicalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom
AT darerjonathand practicalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom
AT tonkeljacqueline practicalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom
AT twickisabell practicalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom
AT ramshawbruce practicalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom
AT nissanaviram practicalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom
AT assafdan practicalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom