Cargando…
A Practical Approach to Predicting Surgical Site Infection Risk Among Patients Before Leaving the Operating Room
A surgical site infection (SSI) prediction model that identifies at-risk patients before leaving the operating room can support efforts to improve patient safety. In this study, eight pre-operative and five perioperative patient- and procedure-specific characteristics were tested with two scoring al...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10434973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37602114 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42085 |
_version_ | 1785092028301836288 |
---|---|
author | Woods, Michael S Ekstrom, Valerie Darer, Jonathan D Tonkel, Jacqueline Twick, Isabell Ramshaw, Bruce Nissan, Aviram Assaf, Dan |
author_facet | Woods, Michael S Ekstrom, Valerie Darer, Jonathan D Tonkel, Jacqueline Twick, Isabell Ramshaw, Bruce Nissan, Aviram Assaf, Dan |
author_sort | Woods, Michael S |
collection | PubMed |
description | A surgical site infection (SSI) prediction model that identifies at-risk patients before leaving the operating room can support efforts to improve patient safety. In this study, eight pre-operative and five perioperative patient- and procedure-specific characteristics were tested with two scoring algorithms: 1) count of positive factors (manual), and 2) logistic regression model (automated). Models were developed and validated using data from 3,440 general and oncologic surgical patients. In the automated algorithm, two pre-operative (procedure urgency, odds ratio [OR]: 1.7; and antibiotic administration >2 hours before incision, OR: 1.6) and three intraoperative risk factors (open surgery [OR: 3.7], high-risk procedure [OR: 3.5], and operative time OR: [2.6]) were associated with SSI risk. The manual score achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.831 and the automated algorithm achieved AUC of 0.868. Open surgery had the greatest impact on prediction, followed by procedure risk, operative time, and procedure urgency. At 80% sensitivity, the manual and automated scores achieved a positive predictive value of 16.3% and 22.0%, respectively. Both the manual and automated SSI risk prediction algorithms accurately identified at-risk populations. Use of either model before the patient leaves the operating room can provide the clinical team with evidence-based guidance to consider proactive intervention to prevent SSIs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10434973 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104349732023-08-18 A Practical Approach to Predicting Surgical Site Infection Risk Among Patients Before Leaving the Operating Room Woods, Michael S Ekstrom, Valerie Darer, Jonathan D Tonkel, Jacqueline Twick, Isabell Ramshaw, Bruce Nissan, Aviram Assaf, Dan Cureus General Surgery A surgical site infection (SSI) prediction model that identifies at-risk patients before leaving the operating room can support efforts to improve patient safety. In this study, eight pre-operative and five perioperative patient- and procedure-specific characteristics were tested with two scoring algorithms: 1) count of positive factors (manual), and 2) logistic regression model (automated). Models were developed and validated using data from 3,440 general and oncologic surgical patients. In the automated algorithm, two pre-operative (procedure urgency, odds ratio [OR]: 1.7; and antibiotic administration >2 hours before incision, OR: 1.6) and three intraoperative risk factors (open surgery [OR: 3.7], high-risk procedure [OR: 3.5], and operative time OR: [2.6]) were associated with SSI risk. The manual score achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.831 and the automated algorithm achieved AUC of 0.868. Open surgery had the greatest impact on prediction, followed by procedure risk, operative time, and procedure urgency. At 80% sensitivity, the manual and automated scores achieved a positive predictive value of 16.3% and 22.0%, respectively. Both the manual and automated SSI risk prediction algorithms accurately identified at-risk populations. Use of either model before the patient leaves the operating room can provide the clinical team with evidence-based guidance to consider proactive intervention to prevent SSIs. Cureus 2023-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10434973/ /pubmed/37602114 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42085 Text en Copyright © 2023, Woods et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | General Surgery Woods, Michael S Ekstrom, Valerie Darer, Jonathan D Tonkel, Jacqueline Twick, Isabell Ramshaw, Bruce Nissan, Aviram Assaf, Dan A Practical Approach to Predicting Surgical Site Infection Risk Among Patients Before Leaving the Operating Room |
title | A Practical Approach to Predicting Surgical Site Infection Risk Among Patients Before Leaving the Operating Room |
title_full | A Practical Approach to Predicting Surgical Site Infection Risk Among Patients Before Leaving the Operating Room |
title_fullStr | A Practical Approach to Predicting Surgical Site Infection Risk Among Patients Before Leaving the Operating Room |
title_full_unstemmed | A Practical Approach to Predicting Surgical Site Infection Risk Among Patients Before Leaving the Operating Room |
title_short | A Practical Approach to Predicting Surgical Site Infection Risk Among Patients Before Leaving the Operating Room |
title_sort | practical approach to predicting surgical site infection risk among patients before leaving the operating room |
topic | General Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10434973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37602114 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42085 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woodsmichaels apracticalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom AT ekstromvalerie apracticalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom AT darerjonathand apracticalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom AT tonkeljacqueline apracticalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom AT twickisabell apracticalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom AT ramshawbruce apracticalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom AT nissanaviram apracticalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom AT assafdan apracticalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom AT woodsmichaels practicalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom AT ekstromvalerie practicalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom AT darerjonathand practicalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom AT tonkeljacqueline practicalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom AT twickisabell practicalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom AT ramshawbruce practicalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom AT nissanaviram practicalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom AT assafdan practicalapproachtopredictingsurgicalsiteinfectionriskamongpatientsbeforeleavingtheoperatingroom |