Cargando…
Clinical applications of electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury: a systematic review
INTRODUCTION: Peripheral nerve injuries are common neurologic injuries that are challenging to treat with current therapies. Electrical stimulation has been shown to accelerate reinnervation and enhance functional recovery. This study aims to review the literature on clinical application of electric...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1162851 |
_version_ | 1785092057246728192 |
---|---|
author | Costello, Meredith C. Errante, Emily L. Smartz, Taylor Ray, Wilson Z. Levi, Allan D. Burks, Stephen Shelby |
author_facet | Costello, Meredith C. Errante, Emily L. Smartz, Taylor Ray, Wilson Z. Levi, Allan D. Burks, Stephen Shelby |
author_sort | Costello, Meredith C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Peripheral nerve injuries are common neurologic injuries that are challenging to treat with current therapies. Electrical stimulation has been shown to accelerate reinnervation and enhance functional recovery. This study aims to review the literature on clinical application of electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were sourced from 1995 to August 2022. Selection was based on predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eight hundred and thirty-five articles were screened with seven being included in this review. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-nine patients with peripheral nerve injuries were represented. Six of the studies were randomized controlled trials. A variety of nerve injuries were represented with all being in the upper extremity and supraclavicular region. Electrical stimulation protocols and evaluation varied. Electrodes were implanted in four studies with one also implanting the stimulator. Length of stimulation per session was either 20 mins or 1 h. Median stimulation frequency was 20 Hz. Stimulation intensity varied from 3 to 30V; pulse width ranged from 0.1 to 1.007 ms. Three protocols were conducted immediately after surgery. Patients were followed for an average of 13.5 months and were evaluated using electrophysiology and combinations of motor, sensory, and functional criteria. DISCUSSION: Patients who received electrical stimulation consistently demonstrated better recovery compared to their respective controls. Electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury is a novel treatment that has not been well-studied in humans. Our review illustrates the potential benefit in implementing this approach into everyday practice. Future research should aim to optimize protocol for clinical use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10435250 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104352502023-08-18 Clinical applications of electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury: a systematic review Costello, Meredith C. Errante, Emily L. Smartz, Taylor Ray, Wilson Z. Levi, Allan D. Burks, Stephen Shelby Front Neurosci Neuroscience INTRODUCTION: Peripheral nerve injuries are common neurologic injuries that are challenging to treat with current therapies. Electrical stimulation has been shown to accelerate reinnervation and enhance functional recovery. This study aims to review the literature on clinical application of electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were sourced from 1995 to August 2022. Selection was based on predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eight hundred and thirty-five articles were screened with seven being included in this review. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-nine patients with peripheral nerve injuries were represented. Six of the studies were randomized controlled trials. A variety of nerve injuries were represented with all being in the upper extremity and supraclavicular region. Electrical stimulation protocols and evaluation varied. Electrodes were implanted in four studies with one also implanting the stimulator. Length of stimulation per session was either 20 mins or 1 h. Median stimulation frequency was 20 Hz. Stimulation intensity varied from 3 to 30V; pulse width ranged from 0.1 to 1.007 ms. Three protocols were conducted immediately after surgery. Patients were followed for an average of 13.5 months and were evaluated using electrophysiology and combinations of motor, sensory, and functional criteria. DISCUSSION: Patients who received electrical stimulation consistently demonstrated better recovery compared to their respective controls. Electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury is a novel treatment that has not been well-studied in humans. Our review illustrates the potential benefit in implementing this approach into everyday practice. Future research should aim to optimize protocol for clinical use. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10435250/ /pubmed/37600003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1162851 Text en Copyright © 2023 Costello, Errante, Smartz, Ray, Levi and Burks. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Costello, Meredith C. Errante, Emily L. Smartz, Taylor Ray, Wilson Z. Levi, Allan D. Burks, Stephen Shelby Clinical applications of electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury: a systematic review |
title | Clinical applications of electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury: a systematic review |
title_full | Clinical applications of electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Clinical applications of electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical applications of electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury: a systematic review |
title_short | Clinical applications of electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury: a systematic review |
title_sort | clinical applications of electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury: a systematic review |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1162851 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT costellomeredithc clinicalapplicationsofelectricalstimulationforperipheralnerveinjuryasystematicreview AT erranteemilyl clinicalapplicationsofelectricalstimulationforperipheralnerveinjuryasystematicreview AT smartztaylor clinicalapplicationsofelectricalstimulationforperipheralnerveinjuryasystematicreview AT raywilsonz clinicalapplicationsofelectricalstimulationforperipheralnerveinjuryasystematicreview AT levialland clinicalapplicationsofelectricalstimulationforperipheralnerveinjuryasystematicreview AT burksstephenshelby clinicalapplicationsofelectricalstimulationforperipheralnerveinjuryasystematicreview |