Cargando…

Quality Control of 11 Cannabinoids by Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS)

OBJECTIVE: Cannabinoid extraction from Cannabis sativa L. (hemp) for nonmedical purposes has become popular in the United States. Concerns, however, have been raised regarding the accuracy of the labels for cannabinoid levels in the commercial products. METHODS: In this study, we developed rapid, se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duzan, Ashraf, Reinken, Desiree, Basti, Mufeed M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3753083
_version_ 1785092069436424192
author Duzan, Ashraf
Reinken, Desiree
Basti, Mufeed M.
author_facet Duzan, Ashraf
Reinken, Desiree
Basti, Mufeed M.
author_sort Duzan, Ashraf
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Cannabinoid extraction from Cannabis sativa L. (hemp) for nonmedical purposes has become popular in the United States. Concerns, however, have been raised regarding the accuracy of the labels for cannabinoid levels in the commercial products. METHODS: In this study, we developed rapid, sensitive, selective, accurate, and validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the quantification of cannabinoids. The methods are for determining 11 cannabinoids in cannabis (hemp) extracted in oil form, and we investigated the accuracy of the labeling and thermal stability regarding the cannabinoids on 17 oil cannabis samples. RESULTS: In the UPLC chromatogram, we see a good resolution and there is no matrix effect and the accuracy were 98.2% to 102.6%, and the precision was 0.52%–8.18%. The linearity of the calibration curves in methanol was with a regression r(2) ≥ 0.99. The lowest of detection (LOD) was 5–25 ng/mL, and the limit of quantification (LOQ) was 10–50 ng/mL. The study showed that only 30% of the commercial samples were within the acceptable range of +/−10% compared to the labeled ingredient concentrations. The thermal stability test profile showed a change in the concentration of cannabinoids in each sample at 37°C for one week, with an average loss of cannabinoids up to 15%. CONCLUSION: The validated method proved to be selective, accurate, and precise, with acceptable linearity within the calibration range with no matrix effect. The stability profile data indicated that high temperatures could change the quality of commercial samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10435299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104352992023-08-18 Quality Control of 11 Cannabinoids by Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) Duzan, Ashraf Reinken, Desiree Basti, Mufeed M. J Anal Methods Chem Research Article OBJECTIVE: Cannabinoid extraction from Cannabis sativa L. (hemp) for nonmedical purposes has become popular in the United States. Concerns, however, have been raised regarding the accuracy of the labels for cannabinoid levels in the commercial products. METHODS: In this study, we developed rapid, sensitive, selective, accurate, and validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the quantification of cannabinoids. The methods are for determining 11 cannabinoids in cannabis (hemp) extracted in oil form, and we investigated the accuracy of the labeling and thermal stability regarding the cannabinoids on 17 oil cannabis samples. RESULTS: In the UPLC chromatogram, we see a good resolution and there is no matrix effect and the accuracy were 98.2% to 102.6%, and the precision was 0.52%–8.18%. The linearity of the calibration curves in methanol was with a regression r(2) ≥ 0.99. The lowest of detection (LOD) was 5–25 ng/mL, and the limit of quantification (LOQ) was 10–50 ng/mL. The study showed that only 30% of the commercial samples were within the acceptable range of +/−10% compared to the labeled ingredient concentrations. The thermal stability test profile showed a change in the concentration of cannabinoids in each sample at 37°C for one week, with an average loss of cannabinoids up to 15%. CONCLUSION: The validated method proved to be selective, accurate, and precise, with acceptable linearity within the calibration range with no matrix effect. The stability profile data indicated that high temperatures could change the quality of commercial samples. Hindawi 2023-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10435299/ /pubmed/37600560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3753083 Text en Copyright © 2023 Ashraf Duzan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Duzan, Ashraf
Reinken, Desiree
Basti, Mufeed M.
Quality Control of 11 Cannabinoids by Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS)
title Quality Control of 11 Cannabinoids by Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS)
title_full Quality Control of 11 Cannabinoids by Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS)
title_fullStr Quality Control of 11 Cannabinoids by Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS)
title_full_unstemmed Quality Control of 11 Cannabinoids by Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS)
title_short Quality Control of 11 Cannabinoids by Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS)
title_sort quality control of 11 cannabinoids by ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (uplc-ms/ms)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3753083
work_keys_str_mv AT duzanashraf qualitycontrolof11cannabinoidsbyultraperformanceliquidchromatographycoupledwithmassspectrometryuplcmsms
AT reinkendesiree qualitycontrolof11cannabinoidsbyultraperformanceliquidchromatographycoupledwithmassspectrometryuplcmsms
AT bastimufeedm qualitycontrolof11cannabinoidsbyultraperformanceliquidchromatographycoupledwithmassspectrometryuplcmsms