Cargando…
The S-S.M.A.R.T: A New Prognostic Tool for Patients with Suspected Sepsis in the Emergency Department
BACKGROUND: The sepsis screening tool is essential because it enables the rapid identification of high-risk patients and facilitates prompt treatment. Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) is a widely used screening tool for sepsis. However, it has limitations in predicting patient progn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37599813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/8852135 |
_version_ | 1785092069661868032 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Ye Jin Kim, Jong Won Lee, Kyeong Ryong Hong, Dae Young Park, Sang O Lee, Young Hwan Kim, Sin Young |
author_facet | Kim, Ye Jin Kim, Jong Won Lee, Kyeong Ryong Hong, Dae Young Park, Sang O Lee, Young Hwan Kim, Sin Young |
author_sort | Kim, Ye Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The sepsis screening tool is essential because it enables the rapid identification of high-risk patients and facilitates prompt treatment. Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) is a widely used screening tool for sepsis. However, it has limitations in predicting patient prognosis. We developed the S-S.M.A.R.T (sepsis evaluation with shock index, mental status, age, and ROX index on triage) and aimed at evaluating it as a screening tool for patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective chart review of patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department. We compared the prognosis prediction abilities of the S-S.M.A.R.T and qSOFA scores in patients with suspected sepsis. The primary outcome was 7-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and ICU admission. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the chi-square test were used. RESULTS: In total, 401 patients were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 72.2 ± 15.6 years, and 213 (53.1%) of them were female. The S-S.M.A.R.T had superior predictive ability for prognosis of patients with suspected sepsis compared to qSOFA (area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.789 vs. 0.699; p=0.02 for 7-day mortality, AUC of 0.786 vs. 0.681; p < 0.001 for 30-day mortality, AUC 0.758 vs 0.717; p=0.05 for ICU admission). CONCLUSION: The S-S.M.A.R.T can be useful in predicting the prognosis of patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10435300 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104353002023-08-18 The S-S.M.A.R.T: A New Prognostic Tool for Patients with Suspected Sepsis in the Emergency Department Kim, Ye Jin Kim, Jong Won Lee, Kyeong Ryong Hong, Dae Young Park, Sang O Lee, Young Hwan Kim, Sin Young Emerg Med Int Research Article BACKGROUND: The sepsis screening tool is essential because it enables the rapid identification of high-risk patients and facilitates prompt treatment. Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) is a widely used screening tool for sepsis. However, it has limitations in predicting patient prognosis. We developed the S-S.M.A.R.T (sepsis evaluation with shock index, mental status, age, and ROX index on triage) and aimed at evaluating it as a screening tool for patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective chart review of patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department. We compared the prognosis prediction abilities of the S-S.M.A.R.T and qSOFA scores in patients with suspected sepsis. The primary outcome was 7-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and ICU admission. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the chi-square test were used. RESULTS: In total, 401 patients were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 72.2 ± 15.6 years, and 213 (53.1%) of them were female. The S-S.M.A.R.T had superior predictive ability for prognosis of patients with suspected sepsis compared to qSOFA (area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.789 vs. 0.699; p=0.02 for 7-day mortality, AUC of 0.786 vs. 0.681; p < 0.001 for 30-day mortality, AUC 0.758 vs 0.717; p=0.05 for ICU admission). CONCLUSION: The S-S.M.A.R.T can be useful in predicting the prognosis of patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department. Hindawi 2023-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10435300/ /pubmed/37599813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/8852135 Text en Copyright © 2023 Ye Jin Kim et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kim, Ye Jin Kim, Jong Won Lee, Kyeong Ryong Hong, Dae Young Park, Sang O Lee, Young Hwan Kim, Sin Young The S-S.M.A.R.T: A New Prognostic Tool for Patients with Suspected Sepsis in the Emergency Department |
title | The S-S.M.A.R.T: A New Prognostic Tool for Patients with Suspected Sepsis in the Emergency Department |
title_full | The S-S.M.A.R.T: A New Prognostic Tool for Patients with Suspected Sepsis in the Emergency Department |
title_fullStr | The S-S.M.A.R.T: A New Prognostic Tool for Patients with Suspected Sepsis in the Emergency Department |
title_full_unstemmed | The S-S.M.A.R.T: A New Prognostic Tool for Patients with Suspected Sepsis in the Emergency Department |
title_short | The S-S.M.A.R.T: A New Prognostic Tool for Patients with Suspected Sepsis in the Emergency Department |
title_sort | s-s.m.a.r.t: a new prognostic tool for patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37599813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/8852135 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimyejin thessmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT kimjongwon thessmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT leekyeongryong thessmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT hongdaeyoung thessmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT parksango thessmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT leeyounghwan thessmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT kimsinyoung thessmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT kimyejin ssmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT kimjongwon ssmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT leekyeongryong ssmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT hongdaeyoung ssmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT parksango ssmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT leeyounghwan ssmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT kimsinyoung ssmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment |