Cargando…

The S-S.M.A.R.T: A New Prognostic Tool for Patients with Suspected Sepsis in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND: The sepsis screening tool is essential because it enables the rapid identification of high-risk patients and facilitates prompt treatment. Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) is a widely used screening tool for sepsis. However, it has limitations in predicting patient progn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Ye Jin, Kim, Jong Won, Lee, Kyeong Ryong, Hong, Dae Young, Park, Sang O, Lee, Young Hwan, Kim, Sin Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37599813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/8852135
_version_ 1785092069661868032
author Kim, Ye Jin
Kim, Jong Won
Lee, Kyeong Ryong
Hong, Dae Young
Park, Sang O
Lee, Young Hwan
Kim, Sin Young
author_facet Kim, Ye Jin
Kim, Jong Won
Lee, Kyeong Ryong
Hong, Dae Young
Park, Sang O
Lee, Young Hwan
Kim, Sin Young
author_sort Kim, Ye Jin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The sepsis screening tool is essential because it enables the rapid identification of high-risk patients and facilitates prompt treatment. Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) is a widely used screening tool for sepsis. However, it has limitations in predicting patient prognosis. We developed the S-S.M.A.R.T (sepsis evaluation with shock index, mental status, age, and ROX index on triage) and aimed at evaluating it as a screening tool for patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective chart review of patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department. We compared the prognosis prediction abilities of the S-S.M.A.R.T and qSOFA scores in patients with suspected sepsis. The primary outcome was 7-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and ICU admission. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the chi-square test were used. RESULTS: In total, 401 patients were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 72.2 ± 15.6 years, and 213 (53.1%) of them were female. The S-S.M.A.R.T had superior predictive ability for prognosis of patients with suspected sepsis compared to qSOFA (area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.789 vs. 0.699; p=0.02 for 7-day mortality, AUC of 0.786 vs. 0.681; p < 0.001 for 30-day mortality, AUC 0.758 vs 0.717; p=0.05 for ICU admission). CONCLUSION: The S-S.M.A.R.T can be useful in predicting the prognosis of patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10435300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104353002023-08-18 The S-S.M.A.R.T: A New Prognostic Tool for Patients with Suspected Sepsis in the Emergency Department Kim, Ye Jin Kim, Jong Won Lee, Kyeong Ryong Hong, Dae Young Park, Sang O Lee, Young Hwan Kim, Sin Young Emerg Med Int Research Article BACKGROUND: The sepsis screening tool is essential because it enables the rapid identification of high-risk patients and facilitates prompt treatment. Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) is a widely used screening tool for sepsis. However, it has limitations in predicting patient prognosis. We developed the S-S.M.A.R.T (sepsis evaluation with shock index, mental status, age, and ROX index on triage) and aimed at evaluating it as a screening tool for patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective chart review of patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department. We compared the prognosis prediction abilities of the S-S.M.A.R.T and qSOFA scores in patients with suspected sepsis. The primary outcome was 7-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and ICU admission. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the chi-square test were used. RESULTS: In total, 401 patients were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 72.2 ± 15.6 years, and 213 (53.1%) of them were female. The S-S.M.A.R.T had superior predictive ability for prognosis of patients with suspected sepsis compared to qSOFA (area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.789 vs. 0.699; p=0.02 for 7-day mortality, AUC of 0.786 vs. 0.681; p < 0.001 for 30-day mortality, AUC 0.758 vs 0.717; p=0.05 for ICU admission). CONCLUSION: The S-S.M.A.R.T can be useful in predicting the prognosis of patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department. Hindawi 2023-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10435300/ /pubmed/37599813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/8852135 Text en Copyright © 2023 Ye Jin Kim et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Ye Jin
Kim, Jong Won
Lee, Kyeong Ryong
Hong, Dae Young
Park, Sang O
Lee, Young Hwan
Kim, Sin Young
The S-S.M.A.R.T: A New Prognostic Tool for Patients with Suspected Sepsis in the Emergency Department
title The S-S.M.A.R.T: A New Prognostic Tool for Patients with Suspected Sepsis in the Emergency Department
title_full The S-S.M.A.R.T: A New Prognostic Tool for Patients with Suspected Sepsis in the Emergency Department
title_fullStr The S-S.M.A.R.T: A New Prognostic Tool for Patients with Suspected Sepsis in the Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed The S-S.M.A.R.T: A New Prognostic Tool for Patients with Suspected Sepsis in the Emergency Department
title_short The S-S.M.A.R.T: A New Prognostic Tool for Patients with Suspected Sepsis in the Emergency Department
title_sort s-s.m.a.r.t: a new prognostic tool for patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37599813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/8852135
work_keys_str_mv AT kimyejin thessmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT kimjongwon thessmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT leekyeongryong thessmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT hongdaeyoung thessmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT parksango thessmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT leeyounghwan thessmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT kimsinyoung thessmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT kimyejin ssmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT kimjongwon ssmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT leekyeongryong ssmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT hongdaeyoung ssmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT parksango ssmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT leeyounghwan ssmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT kimsinyoung ssmartanewprognostictoolforpatientswithsuspectedsepsisintheemergencydepartment