Cargando…

Fractional CO(2) laser versus 1064-nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser for inflammatory acne vulgaris treatment: a randomized clinical trial

Acne vulgaris is challenging to treat for several individuals. Laser therapy may be a desirable alternative to traditional therapies with limited success. This study aimed to assess efficacy of fractional CO(2) laser versus Nd:YAG laser for acne vulgaris therapy. Thirty cases with acne vulgaris unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hammoda, Tasneem Muhammad, Ahmed, Naglaa Abdallah, Hamdino, Mervat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37592125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-023-03855-6
_version_ 1785092137880125440
author Hammoda, Tasneem Muhammad
Ahmed, Naglaa Abdallah
Hamdino, Mervat
author_facet Hammoda, Tasneem Muhammad
Ahmed, Naglaa Abdallah
Hamdino, Mervat
author_sort Hammoda, Tasneem Muhammad
collection PubMed
description Acne vulgaris is challenging to treat for several individuals. Laser therapy may be a desirable alternative to traditional therapies with limited success. This study aimed to assess efficacy of fractional CO(2) laser versus Nd:YAG laser for acne vulgaris therapy. Thirty cases with acne vulgaris underwent both fractional CO(2) laser and Nd: YAG laser treatments in a randomized split face design at a 14-day interval for four sessions. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by counting acne lesions and utilizing the Global Acne Severity Scale (GEA Scale). GEAs decreased significantly after both fractional CO(2) and Nd:YAG modalities after treatment and at a 3-month follow-up; fractional CO(2) demonstrated significant more decrease in GEAs with (P = 0.006, 0.00 (respectively. Moreover, fractional CO(2) showed a significantly higher satisfaction level (P = 0.004) and a better clinical improvement percentage regarding inflammatory and noninflammatory acne lesions (P = 0.007 and 0.000, respectively) after 3 months of follow-up. Apart from transient erythema, there were insignificant adverse effects concerning both treated sides. Fractional CO(2) and Nd:YAG lasers are efficient physical modalities of acne treatment. However, fractional CO(2) laser was more effective and more satisfying to the patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10435603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104356032023-08-19 Fractional CO(2) laser versus 1064-nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser for inflammatory acne vulgaris treatment: a randomized clinical trial Hammoda, Tasneem Muhammad Ahmed, Naglaa Abdallah Hamdino, Mervat Lasers Med Sci Original Article Acne vulgaris is challenging to treat for several individuals. Laser therapy may be a desirable alternative to traditional therapies with limited success. This study aimed to assess efficacy of fractional CO(2) laser versus Nd:YAG laser for acne vulgaris therapy. Thirty cases with acne vulgaris underwent both fractional CO(2) laser and Nd: YAG laser treatments in a randomized split face design at a 14-day interval for four sessions. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by counting acne lesions and utilizing the Global Acne Severity Scale (GEA Scale). GEAs decreased significantly after both fractional CO(2) and Nd:YAG modalities after treatment and at a 3-month follow-up; fractional CO(2) demonstrated significant more decrease in GEAs with (P = 0.006, 0.00 (respectively. Moreover, fractional CO(2) showed a significantly higher satisfaction level (P = 0.004) and a better clinical improvement percentage regarding inflammatory and noninflammatory acne lesions (P = 0.007 and 0.000, respectively) after 3 months of follow-up. Apart from transient erythema, there were insignificant adverse effects concerning both treated sides. Fractional CO(2) and Nd:YAG lasers are efficient physical modalities of acne treatment. However, fractional CO(2) laser was more effective and more satisfying to the patients. Springer London 2023-08-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10435603/ /pubmed/37592125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-023-03855-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Hammoda, Tasneem Muhammad
Ahmed, Naglaa Abdallah
Hamdino, Mervat
Fractional CO(2) laser versus 1064-nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser for inflammatory acne vulgaris treatment: a randomized clinical trial
title Fractional CO(2) laser versus 1064-nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser for inflammatory acne vulgaris treatment: a randomized clinical trial
title_full Fractional CO(2) laser versus 1064-nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser for inflammatory acne vulgaris treatment: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Fractional CO(2) laser versus 1064-nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser for inflammatory acne vulgaris treatment: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Fractional CO(2) laser versus 1064-nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser for inflammatory acne vulgaris treatment: a randomized clinical trial
title_short Fractional CO(2) laser versus 1064-nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser for inflammatory acne vulgaris treatment: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort fractional co(2) laser versus 1064-nm long-pulsed nd:yag laser for inflammatory acne vulgaris treatment: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37592125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-023-03855-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hammodatasneemmuhammad fractionalco2laserversus1064nmlongpulsedndyaglaserforinflammatoryacnevulgaristreatmentarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ahmednaglaaabdallah fractionalco2laserversus1064nmlongpulsedndyaglaserforinflammatoryacnevulgaristreatmentarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hamdinomervat fractionalco2laserversus1064nmlongpulsedndyaglaserforinflammatoryacnevulgaristreatmentarandomizedclinicaltrial