Cargando…

Intravenous ferric derisomaltose versus oral iron for persistent iron deficient pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of intravenous (IV) iron (ferric derisomaltose) with oral iron (ferrous fumarate) in women 14–21 weeks pregnant with persistent iron deficiency (ferritin < 30 µg/L). METHODS: In a single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial at a Danish hospital, women w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansen, Rebecka, Sommer, Veronika Markova, Pinborg, Anja, Krebs, Lone, Thomsen, Lars Lykke, Moos, Torben, Holm, Charlotte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36107229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06768-x
_version_ 1785092138292215808
author Hansen, Rebecka
Sommer, Veronika Markova
Pinborg, Anja
Krebs, Lone
Thomsen, Lars Lykke
Moos, Torben
Holm, Charlotte
author_facet Hansen, Rebecka
Sommer, Veronika Markova
Pinborg, Anja
Krebs, Lone
Thomsen, Lars Lykke
Moos, Torben
Holm, Charlotte
author_sort Hansen, Rebecka
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of intravenous (IV) iron (ferric derisomaltose) with oral iron (ferrous fumarate) in women 14–21 weeks pregnant with persistent iron deficiency (ferritin < 30 µg/L). METHODS: In a single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial at a Danish hospital, women with persistent iron deficiency after routine oral iron treatment were allocated to receive 1000 mg IV iron (single-dose) or 100 mg elemental oral iron daily. Outcomes were assessed during an 18-week follow-up period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of non-anaemic (haemoglobin [Hb] ≥ 11 g/dL) women throughout follow-up. Other outcomes included changes in haematological parameters, patient-reported fatigue, and quality of life (QoL). Safety was assessed by recording adverse events. RESULTS: From July 2017 to February 2020, 100 women were randomised to IV iron and 101 to oral iron. Throughout follow-up, 91% of women were non-anaemic in the IV iron group compared with 73% in the oral iron group (18% difference [95% confidence interval 0.10–0.25]; p < 0.001). The mean Hb increase was significantly greater with IV iron versus oral iron at Weeks 6 (0.4 versus − 0.2 g/dL; p < 0.001), 12 (0.5 versus 0.1 g/dL; p < 0.001), and 18 (0.8 versus 0.5 g/dL; p = 0.01). Improvements in fatigue and QoL were greater with IV iron versus oral iron at Weeks 3 and 6. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was comparable between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: IV iron was superior in preventing anaemia compared with oral iron in pregnant women with persistent iron deficiency; biochemical superiority was accompanied by improved fatigue and QoL. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Clinical Trials Database: EudraCT no.: 2017-000776-29 (3 May 2017); ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03188445 (13 June 2017). The trial protocol has been published: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186%2Fs13063-020-04637-z. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00404-022-06768-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10435604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104356042023-08-19 Intravenous ferric derisomaltose versus oral iron for persistent iron deficient pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial Hansen, Rebecka Sommer, Veronika Markova Pinborg, Anja Krebs, Lone Thomsen, Lars Lykke Moos, Torben Holm, Charlotte Arch Gynecol Obstet Maternal-Fetal Medicine PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of intravenous (IV) iron (ferric derisomaltose) with oral iron (ferrous fumarate) in women 14–21 weeks pregnant with persistent iron deficiency (ferritin < 30 µg/L). METHODS: In a single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial at a Danish hospital, women with persistent iron deficiency after routine oral iron treatment were allocated to receive 1000 mg IV iron (single-dose) or 100 mg elemental oral iron daily. Outcomes were assessed during an 18-week follow-up period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of non-anaemic (haemoglobin [Hb] ≥ 11 g/dL) women throughout follow-up. Other outcomes included changes in haematological parameters, patient-reported fatigue, and quality of life (QoL). Safety was assessed by recording adverse events. RESULTS: From July 2017 to February 2020, 100 women were randomised to IV iron and 101 to oral iron. Throughout follow-up, 91% of women were non-anaemic in the IV iron group compared with 73% in the oral iron group (18% difference [95% confidence interval 0.10–0.25]; p < 0.001). The mean Hb increase was significantly greater with IV iron versus oral iron at Weeks 6 (0.4 versus − 0.2 g/dL; p < 0.001), 12 (0.5 versus 0.1 g/dL; p < 0.001), and 18 (0.8 versus 0.5 g/dL; p = 0.01). Improvements in fatigue and QoL were greater with IV iron versus oral iron at Weeks 3 and 6. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was comparable between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: IV iron was superior in preventing anaemia compared with oral iron in pregnant women with persistent iron deficiency; biochemical superiority was accompanied by improved fatigue and QoL. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Clinical Trials Database: EudraCT no.: 2017-000776-29 (3 May 2017); ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03188445 (13 June 2017). The trial protocol has been published: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186%2Fs13063-020-04637-z. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00404-022-06768-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-15 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10435604/ /pubmed/36107229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06768-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Hansen, Rebecka
Sommer, Veronika Markova
Pinborg, Anja
Krebs, Lone
Thomsen, Lars Lykke
Moos, Torben
Holm, Charlotte
Intravenous ferric derisomaltose versus oral iron for persistent iron deficient pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial
title Intravenous ferric derisomaltose versus oral iron for persistent iron deficient pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Intravenous ferric derisomaltose versus oral iron for persistent iron deficient pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Intravenous ferric derisomaltose versus oral iron for persistent iron deficient pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Intravenous ferric derisomaltose versus oral iron for persistent iron deficient pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Intravenous ferric derisomaltose versus oral iron for persistent iron deficient pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort intravenous ferric derisomaltose versus oral iron for persistent iron deficient pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial
topic Maternal-Fetal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36107229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06768-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hansenrebecka intravenousferricderisomaltoseversusoralironforpersistentirondeficientpregnantwomenarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sommerveronikamarkova intravenousferricderisomaltoseversusoralironforpersistentirondeficientpregnantwomenarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pinborganja intravenousferricderisomaltoseversusoralironforpersistentirondeficientpregnantwomenarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT krebslone intravenousferricderisomaltoseversusoralironforpersistentirondeficientpregnantwomenarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thomsenlarslykke intravenousferricderisomaltoseversusoralironforpersistentirondeficientpregnantwomenarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT moostorben intravenousferricderisomaltoseversusoralironforpersistentirondeficientpregnantwomenarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT holmcharlotte intravenousferricderisomaltoseversusoralironforpersistentirondeficientpregnantwomenarandomisedcontrolledtrial