Targeting the neutral hip-to-calcaneus axis in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty is feasible with fewer alignment outliers for varus osteoarthritic patients

PURPOSE: Assessment of the conventional mechanical axis (MA) (hip-to-talus axis) is reported to result in constitutional varus in the native knee. However, the ground MA (hip-to-calcaneus axis), which is the line from the hip center to the bottom of the calcaneus, passes through the center of the knee joint in the native knee and is a possible alternative target for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) assessments. Therefore, this study aimed to present a “ground kinematically aligned (KA)-TKA.” In this technique, the femoral component is placed on the cylindrical axis using the calipered technique and the tibial component is placed to give a neutral ground MA. Radiographical investigation was used to determine whether physiological alignment can be individually achieved with ground KA-TKA; this was compared with that of a tibia-restricted modified KA-TKA, referring to conventional MA (hip-to-talus axis) results. METHODS: As the primary endpoint, this prospective cohort study compared the ground MA ratios of the knee joints in 40 ground KA-TKAs (G group: Coronal Plain Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) 28 type I, 7 II, 1 IV, and 4 V) with those of the preceding 60 modified KA-TKAs (M group: CPAK 46 type I, 12 II, and 2 V) performed for patients with varus osteoarthritis (OA). The number of outliers differing over ± 5% from the neutral were compared between groups using the χ(2)-test. The Hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle, coronal femoral/tibial component alignment (FCA/TCA), and joint line orientation angle (JLOA) were compared between the groups using non-paired t-tests. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The G group had a higher ratio of the ground MA passing through the knee center than the M group did; outliers differing over ± 5% from the neutral of the ground MA were 2/40 cases in the G group and 20/60 cases in the M group, which was a significant difference (p = 0.001). The HKA angle, FCA/TCA, and JLOA were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting the ground MA in KA-TKA for patients with varus OA was feasible and has the potential to provide a physiological alignment more similar to the native knee in TKA than other kinematic alignment techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.