Cargando…

Chromoendoscopy in Combination with Random Biopsies for Patients with Pathogenic CDH1 Mutations Undergoing Endoscopic Surveillance

OBJECTIVES: Germline mutations in the CDH1-gene are identified as the cause of 30–40% of cases of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer, an autosomal-dominant inherited cancer predisposition syndrome. Given this high risk of developing diffuse gastric cancer, carriers of a pathogenic CDH1 germline mutat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruf, Benjamin, Roggia, Cristiana, Schroeder, Christopher, Mattern, Sven, Fend, Falko, Klag, Thomas, Götz, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35499650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12029-022-00831-1
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Germline mutations in the CDH1-gene are identified as the cause of 30–40% of cases of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer, an autosomal-dominant inherited cancer predisposition syndrome. Given this high risk of developing diffuse gastric cancer, carriers of a pathogenic CDH1 germline mutation are advised to undergo prophylactic gastrectomy. For patients preferring conservative management, endoscopic surveillance is recommended. The detection of diffuse gastric cancer using white light endoscopy, however, remains challenging. METHODS: Patients with pathogenic CDH1 mutation underwent (chromo)endoscopic surveillance or endoscopy prior to surgery. Biopsies were taken at suspicious sites identified by chromoendoscopy. In addition, endoscopically normal areas were assessed with mapping biopsies. Detection rates from endoscopic biopsies (mapping vs. targeted) and gastrectomy specimen were then compared. RESULT: Between 11/2015 and 12/2020, ten patients from four families with a known CDH1 germline mutation had a total of n = 24 endoscopies with n = 518 total biopsies being examined. Three patients were diagnosed with GC during the study period. These patients all had suspicious chromoendoscopic lesions (= detection rate 100%). In two of three patients who had suspicious chromoendoscopic lesions, signet cell carcinoma was also detected in mapping biopsies and multiple additional cancer foci were identified in the gastrectomy specimen. CONCLUSION: Chromoendoscopy facilitated detection of gastric carcinoma foci in CDH1 mutation carriers. Chromoendoscopy identified all patients with gastric cancer, but not all cancer foci present in these patients. We conclude that for patients opting against prophylactic total gastrectomy, the addition of chromoendoscopy to white light could be used to enhance diagnostic reliability of endoscopic surveillance.