Cargando…

Models Predicting Postpartum Glucose Intolerance Among Women with a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite the crucial role that prediction models play in guiding early risk stratification and timely intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), their use is not widespread in clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to examine the me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Belsti, Yitayeh, Moran, Lisa, Handiso, Demelash Woldeyohannes, Versace, Vincent, Goldstein, Rebecca, Mousa, Aya, Teede, Helena, Enticott, Joanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37294513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11892-023-01516-0
_version_ 1785092142599766016
author Belsti, Yitayeh
Moran, Lisa
Handiso, Demelash Woldeyohannes
Versace, Vincent
Goldstein, Rebecca
Mousa, Aya
Teede, Helena
Enticott, Joanne
author_facet Belsti, Yitayeh
Moran, Lisa
Handiso, Demelash Woldeyohannes
Versace, Vincent
Goldstein, Rebecca
Mousa, Aya
Teede, Helena
Enticott, Joanne
author_sort Belsti, Yitayeh
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite the crucial role that prediction models play in guiding early risk stratification and timely intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), their use is not widespread in clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to examine the methodological characteristics and quality of existing prognostic models predicting postpartum glucose intolerance following GDM. Recent Findings. A systematic review was conducted on relevant risk prediction models, resulting in 15 eligible publications from research groups in various countries. Our review found that traditional statistical models were more common than machine learning models, and only two were assessed to have a low risk of bias. Seven were internally validated, but none were externally validated. Model discrimination and calibration were done in 13 and four studies, respectively. Various predictors were identified, including body mass index, fasting glucose concentration during pregnancy, maternal age, family history of diabetes, biochemical variables, oral glucose tolerance test, use of insulin in pregnancy, postnatal fasting glucose level, genetic risk factors, hemoglobin A1c, and weight. SUMMARY: The existing prognostic models for glucose intolerance following GDM have various methodological shortcomings, with only a few models being assessed to have low risk of bias and validated internally. Future research should prioritize the development of robust, high-quality risk prediction models that follow appropriate guidelines, in order to advance this area and improve early risk stratification and intervention for glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes among women who have had GDM. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11892-023-01516-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10435618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104356182023-08-19 Models Predicting Postpartum Glucose Intolerance Among Women with a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review Belsti, Yitayeh Moran, Lisa Handiso, Demelash Woldeyohannes Versace, Vincent Goldstein, Rebecca Mousa, Aya Teede, Helena Enticott, Joanne Curr Diab Rep Article PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite the crucial role that prediction models play in guiding early risk stratification and timely intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), their use is not widespread in clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to examine the methodological characteristics and quality of existing prognostic models predicting postpartum glucose intolerance following GDM. Recent Findings. A systematic review was conducted on relevant risk prediction models, resulting in 15 eligible publications from research groups in various countries. Our review found that traditional statistical models were more common than machine learning models, and only two were assessed to have a low risk of bias. Seven were internally validated, but none were externally validated. Model discrimination and calibration were done in 13 and four studies, respectively. Various predictors were identified, including body mass index, fasting glucose concentration during pregnancy, maternal age, family history of diabetes, biochemical variables, oral glucose tolerance test, use of insulin in pregnancy, postnatal fasting glucose level, genetic risk factors, hemoglobin A1c, and weight. SUMMARY: The existing prognostic models for glucose intolerance following GDM have various methodological shortcomings, with only a few models being assessed to have low risk of bias and validated internally. Future research should prioritize the development of robust, high-quality risk prediction models that follow appropriate guidelines, in order to advance this area and improve early risk stratification and intervention for glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes among women who have had GDM. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11892-023-01516-0. Springer US 2023-06-09 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10435618/ /pubmed/37294513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11892-023-01516-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Belsti, Yitayeh
Moran, Lisa
Handiso, Demelash Woldeyohannes
Versace, Vincent
Goldstein, Rebecca
Mousa, Aya
Teede, Helena
Enticott, Joanne
Models Predicting Postpartum Glucose Intolerance Among Women with a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review
title Models Predicting Postpartum Glucose Intolerance Among Women with a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review
title_full Models Predicting Postpartum Glucose Intolerance Among Women with a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review
title_fullStr Models Predicting Postpartum Glucose Intolerance Among Women with a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Models Predicting Postpartum Glucose Intolerance Among Women with a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review
title_short Models Predicting Postpartum Glucose Intolerance Among Women with a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review
title_sort models predicting postpartum glucose intolerance among women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37294513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11892-023-01516-0
work_keys_str_mv AT belstiyitayeh modelspredictingpostpartumglucoseintoleranceamongwomenwithahistoryofgestationaldiabetesmellitusasystematicreview
AT moranlisa modelspredictingpostpartumglucoseintoleranceamongwomenwithahistoryofgestationaldiabetesmellitusasystematicreview
AT handisodemelashwoldeyohannes modelspredictingpostpartumglucoseintoleranceamongwomenwithahistoryofgestationaldiabetesmellitusasystematicreview
AT versacevincent modelspredictingpostpartumglucoseintoleranceamongwomenwithahistoryofgestationaldiabetesmellitusasystematicreview
AT goldsteinrebecca modelspredictingpostpartumglucoseintoleranceamongwomenwithahistoryofgestationaldiabetesmellitusasystematicreview
AT mousaaya modelspredictingpostpartumglucoseintoleranceamongwomenwithahistoryofgestationaldiabetesmellitusasystematicreview
AT teedehelena modelspredictingpostpartumglucoseintoleranceamongwomenwithahistoryofgestationaldiabetesmellitusasystematicreview
AT enticottjoanne modelspredictingpostpartumglucoseintoleranceamongwomenwithahistoryofgestationaldiabetesmellitusasystematicreview