Cargando…
The transparency of quantitative empirical legal research published in highly ranked law journals (2018–2020): an observational study
Background Scientists are increasingly concerned with making their work easy to verify and build upon. Associated practices include sharing data, materials, and analytic scripts, and preregistering protocols. This shift towards increased transparency and rigor has been referred to as a “credibility...
Autores principales: | Chin, Jason, Zeiler, Kathryn, Dilevski, Natali, Holcombe, Alex, Gatfield-Jeffries, Rosemary, Bishop, Ruby, Vazire, Simine, Schiavone, Sarah |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600907 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.127563.1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power
por: Fraley, R. Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Honest signaling in academic publishing
por: Tiokhin, Leonid, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Publishing and the law: current legal issues
por: Strauch, Bruce A
Publicado: (2001) -
What do participants think of our research practices? An examination of behavioural psychology participants' preferences
por: Bottesini, Julia G., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
In Search of Our True Selves: Feedback as a Path to Self-Knowledge
por: Bollich, Kathryn L., et al.
Publicado: (2011)