Cargando…

Adjusting FRAX Estimates of Fracture Probability Based on a Positive Vertebral Fracture Assessment

IMPORTANCE: FRAX is the most widely used and validated fracture risk prediction tool worldwide. Vertebral fractures, which are an indicator of subsequent osteoporotic fractures, can be identified using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) vertebral fracture assessment (VFA). OBJECTIVE: To assess t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Carrie, Leslie, William D., Morin, Suzanne N., Lix, Lisa M., McCloskey, Eugene V., Johansson, Helena, Harvey, Nicholas C., Lorentzon, Mattias, Kanis, John A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10436131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37589976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29253
_version_ 1785092259256991744
author Ye, Carrie
Leslie, William D.
Morin, Suzanne N.
Lix, Lisa M.
McCloskey, Eugene V.
Johansson, Helena
Harvey, Nicholas C.
Lorentzon, Mattias
Kanis, John A.
author_facet Ye, Carrie
Leslie, William D.
Morin, Suzanne N.
Lix, Lisa M.
McCloskey, Eugene V.
Johansson, Helena
Harvey, Nicholas C.
Lorentzon, Mattias
Kanis, John A.
author_sort Ye, Carrie
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: FRAX is the most widely used and validated fracture risk prediction tool worldwide. Vertebral fractures, which are an indicator of subsequent osteoporotic fractures, can be identified using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) vertebral fracture assessment (VFA). OBJECTIVE: To assess the calibration of FRAX and develop a simple method for improving FRAX-predicted fracture probability in the presence of VFA-identified fracture. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prognostic study analyzed the DXA and VFA results of all individuals who underwent a VFA between March 31, 2010, and March 31, 2018, who were included in the Manitoba Bone Mineral Density Registry. These individuals were randomly assigned to either the development cohort or validation cohort. A modified algorithm-based qualitative approach was used by expert readers to code VFAs as positive (≥1 vertebral fractures detected) or negative (0 vertebral fracture detected). Statistical analysis was conducted from August 7, 2022, to May 22, 2023. EXPOSURES: FRAX scores for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture were calculated with or without VFA results. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Incident fractures and death were ascertained using linked population-based health care provincial data. Cumulative incidence curves for MOF and hip fracture were constructed, including competing mortality, to predict the 10-year observed risk of fracture. The observed probability was compared with FRAX-predicted fracture probability with and without VFA results and recalibrated FRAX from derived multipliers. RESULTS: The full cohort of 11 766 individuals was randomly allocated to the development cohort (n = 7854; 7349 females [93.6%]; mean [SD] age, 75.7 [6.8] years) or the validation cohort (n = 3912; 3713 females [94.9%]; mean [SD] age, 75.5 [6.9] years). Over a mean (SD) observation time of 3.8 (2.3) years, with the longest observation at 7.5 years, FRAX was well calibrated in subgroups with negative VFA results. For individuals without a prior clinical fracture but with a positive VFA result, the 10-year FRAX-predicted MOF probability was 16.3% (95% CI, 15.7%-16.8%) without VFA information and 23.4% (95% CI, 22.7%-24.1%) with VFA information. The observed 10-year probabilities were 26.9% (95% CI, 26.0%-27.8%) and 11.2% (95% CI, 10.3%-12.1%), respectively, resulting in recalibration multipliers of 1.15 (95% CI, 0.87-1.43) for MOF and 1.31 (95% CI, 0.75-1.87) for hip fracture. For individuals with a prior clinical fracture and a positive VFA result, the 10-year FRAX-predicted probabilities were 25.0% (95% CI, 24.2%-25.7%) for MOF and 9.3% (95% CI, 8.7%-10.0%) for hip fracture. The observed 10-year probabilities were 38.1% (95% CI, 37.0%-39.1%) for MOF and 16.4% (95% CI, 15.4%-17.4%) for hip fracture, resulting in a recalibration multiplier of 1.53 (95% CI, 1.10-1.96) for MOF and 1.76 (95% CI, 1.17-2.35) for hip fracture. Good calibration (>0.90) was confirmed using the derived multipliers in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Results of this prognostic study suggest that FRAX underestimated fracture risk in patients with VFA-identified fractures. Simple multipliers could recover FRAX calibration in individuals with VFA-identified fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10436131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104361312023-08-19 Adjusting FRAX Estimates of Fracture Probability Based on a Positive Vertebral Fracture Assessment Ye, Carrie Leslie, William D. Morin, Suzanne N. Lix, Lisa M. McCloskey, Eugene V. Johansson, Helena Harvey, Nicholas C. Lorentzon, Mattias Kanis, John A. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: FRAX is the most widely used and validated fracture risk prediction tool worldwide. Vertebral fractures, which are an indicator of subsequent osteoporotic fractures, can be identified using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) vertebral fracture assessment (VFA). OBJECTIVE: To assess the calibration of FRAX and develop a simple method for improving FRAX-predicted fracture probability in the presence of VFA-identified fracture. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prognostic study analyzed the DXA and VFA results of all individuals who underwent a VFA between March 31, 2010, and March 31, 2018, who were included in the Manitoba Bone Mineral Density Registry. These individuals were randomly assigned to either the development cohort or validation cohort. A modified algorithm-based qualitative approach was used by expert readers to code VFAs as positive (≥1 vertebral fractures detected) or negative (0 vertebral fracture detected). Statistical analysis was conducted from August 7, 2022, to May 22, 2023. EXPOSURES: FRAX scores for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture were calculated with or without VFA results. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Incident fractures and death were ascertained using linked population-based health care provincial data. Cumulative incidence curves for MOF and hip fracture were constructed, including competing mortality, to predict the 10-year observed risk of fracture. The observed probability was compared with FRAX-predicted fracture probability with and without VFA results and recalibrated FRAX from derived multipliers. RESULTS: The full cohort of 11 766 individuals was randomly allocated to the development cohort (n = 7854; 7349 females [93.6%]; mean [SD] age, 75.7 [6.8] years) or the validation cohort (n = 3912; 3713 females [94.9%]; mean [SD] age, 75.5 [6.9] years). Over a mean (SD) observation time of 3.8 (2.3) years, with the longest observation at 7.5 years, FRAX was well calibrated in subgroups with negative VFA results. For individuals without a prior clinical fracture but with a positive VFA result, the 10-year FRAX-predicted MOF probability was 16.3% (95% CI, 15.7%-16.8%) without VFA information and 23.4% (95% CI, 22.7%-24.1%) with VFA information. The observed 10-year probabilities were 26.9% (95% CI, 26.0%-27.8%) and 11.2% (95% CI, 10.3%-12.1%), respectively, resulting in recalibration multipliers of 1.15 (95% CI, 0.87-1.43) for MOF and 1.31 (95% CI, 0.75-1.87) for hip fracture. For individuals with a prior clinical fracture and a positive VFA result, the 10-year FRAX-predicted probabilities were 25.0% (95% CI, 24.2%-25.7%) for MOF and 9.3% (95% CI, 8.7%-10.0%) for hip fracture. The observed 10-year probabilities were 38.1% (95% CI, 37.0%-39.1%) for MOF and 16.4% (95% CI, 15.4%-17.4%) for hip fracture, resulting in a recalibration multiplier of 1.53 (95% CI, 1.10-1.96) for MOF and 1.76 (95% CI, 1.17-2.35) for hip fracture. Good calibration (>0.90) was confirmed using the derived multipliers in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Results of this prognostic study suggest that FRAX underestimated fracture risk in patients with VFA-identified fractures. Simple multipliers could recover FRAX calibration in individuals with VFA-identified fractures. American Medical Association 2023-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10436131/ /pubmed/37589976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29253 Text en Copyright 2023 Ye C et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Ye, Carrie
Leslie, William D.
Morin, Suzanne N.
Lix, Lisa M.
McCloskey, Eugene V.
Johansson, Helena
Harvey, Nicholas C.
Lorentzon, Mattias
Kanis, John A.
Adjusting FRAX Estimates of Fracture Probability Based on a Positive Vertebral Fracture Assessment
title Adjusting FRAX Estimates of Fracture Probability Based on a Positive Vertebral Fracture Assessment
title_full Adjusting FRAX Estimates of Fracture Probability Based on a Positive Vertebral Fracture Assessment
title_fullStr Adjusting FRAX Estimates of Fracture Probability Based on a Positive Vertebral Fracture Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Adjusting FRAX Estimates of Fracture Probability Based on a Positive Vertebral Fracture Assessment
title_short Adjusting FRAX Estimates of Fracture Probability Based on a Positive Vertebral Fracture Assessment
title_sort adjusting frax estimates of fracture probability based on a positive vertebral fracture assessment
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10436131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37589976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29253
work_keys_str_mv AT yecarrie adjustingfraxestimatesoffractureprobabilitybasedonapositivevertebralfractureassessment
AT lesliewilliamd adjustingfraxestimatesoffractureprobabilitybasedonapositivevertebralfractureassessment
AT morinsuzannen adjustingfraxestimatesoffractureprobabilitybasedonapositivevertebralfractureassessment
AT lixlisam adjustingfraxestimatesoffractureprobabilitybasedonapositivevertebralfractureassessment
AT mccloskeyeugenev adjustingfraxestimatesoffractureprobabilitybasedonapositivevertebralfractureassessment
AT johanssonhelena adjustingfraxestimatesoffractureprobabilitybasedonapositivevertebralfractureassessment
AT harveynicholasc adjustingfraxestimatesoffractureprobabilitybasedonapositivevertebralfractureassessment
AT lorentzonmattias adjustingfraxestimatesoffractureprobabilitybasedonapositivevertebralfractureassessment
AT kanisjohna adjustingfraxestimatesoffractureprobabilitybasedonapositivevertebralfractureassessment