Cargando…

Distribution of transpulmonary pressure during one-lung ventilation in pigs at different body positions

Background. Global and regional transpulmonary pressure (P(L)) during one-lung ventilation (OLV) is poorly characterized. We hypothesized that global and regional P(L) and driving P(L) (ΔP(L)) increase during protective low tidal volume OLV compared to two-lung ventilation (TLV), and vary with body...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wittenstein, Jakob, Scharffenberg, Martin, Yang, Xiuli, Bluth, Thomas, Kiss, Thomas, Schultz, Marcus J., Rocco, Patricia R. M., Pelosi, Paolo, Gama de Abreu, Marcelo, Huhle, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10436328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37601645
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1204531
_version_ 1785092297889677312
author Wittenstein, Jakob
Scharffenberg, Martin
Yang, Xiuli
Bluth, Thomas
Kiss, Thomas
Schultz, Marcus J.
Rocco, Patricia R. M.
Pelosi, Paolo
Gama de Abreu, Marcelo
Huhle, Robert
author_facet Wittenstein, Jakob
Scharffenberg, Martin
Yang, Xiuli
Bluth, Thomas
Kiss, Thomas
Schultz, Marcus J.
Rocco, Patricia R. M.
Pelosi, Paolo
Gama de Abreu, Marcelo
Huhle, Robert
author_sort Wittenstein, Jakob
collection PubMed
description Background. Global and regional transpulmonary pressure (P(L)) during one-lung ventilation (OLV) is poorly characterized. We hypothesized that global and regional P(L) and driving P(L) (ΔP(L)) increase during protective low tidal volume OLV compared to two-lung ventilation (TLV), and vary with body position. Methods. In sixteen anesthetized juvenile pigs, intra-pleural pressure sensors were placed in ventral, dorsal, and caudal zones of the left hemithorax by video-assisted thoracoscopy. A right thoracotomy was performed and lipopolysaccharide administered intravenously to mimic the inflammatory response due to thoracic surgery. Animals were ventilated in a volume-controlled mode with a tidal volume (V(T)) of 6 mL kg(−1) during TLV and of 5 mL kg(−1) during OLV and a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH(2)O. Global and local transpulmonary pressures were calculated. Lung instability was defined as end-expiratory P(L)<2.9 cmH(2)O according to previous investigations. Variables were acquired during TLV (TLVsupine), left lung ventilation in supine (OLVsupine), semilateral (OLVsemilateral), lateral (OLVlateral) and prone (OLVprone) positions randomized according to Latin-square sequence. Effects of position were tested using repeated measures ANOVA. Results. End-expiratory P(L) and ΔP(L) were higher during OLVsupine than TLVsupine. During OLV, regional end-inspiratory P(L) and ΔP(L) did not differ significantly among body positions. Yet, end-expiratory P(L) was lower in semilateral (ventral: 4.8 ± 2.9 cmH(2)O; caudal: 3.1 ± 2.6 cmH(2)O) and lateral (ventral: 1.9 ± 3.3 cmH(2)O; caudal: 2.7 ± 1.7 cmH(2)O) compared to supine (ventral: 4.8 ± 2.9 cmH(2)O; caudal: 3.1 ± 2.6 cmH(2)O) and prone position (ventral: 1.7 ± 2.5 cmH(2)O; caudal: 3.3 ± 1.6 cmH(2)O), mainly in ventral (p ≤ 0.001) and caudal (p = 0.007) regions. Lung instability was detected more often in semilateral (26 out of 48 measurements; p = 0.012) and lateral (29 out of 48 measurements, p < 0.001) as compared to supine position (15 out of 48 measurements), and more often in lateral as compared to prone position (19 out of 48 measurements, p = 0.027). Conclusion. Compared to TLV, OLV increased lung stress. Body position did not affect stress of the ventilated lung during OLV, but lung stability was lowest in semilateral and lateral decubitus position.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10436328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104363282023-08-19 Distribution of transpulmonary pressure during one-lung ventilation in pigs at different body positions Wittenstein, Jakob Scharffenberg, Martin Yang, Xiuli Bluth, Thomas Kiss, Thomas Schultz, Marcus J. Rocco, Patricia R. M. Pelosi, Paolo Gama de Abreu, Marcelo Huhle, Robert Front Physiol Physiology Background. Global and regional transpulmonary pressure (P(L)) during one-lung ventilation (OLV) is poorly characterized. We hypothesized that global and regional P(L) and driving P(L) (ΔP(L)) increase during protective low tidal volume OLV compared to two-lung ventilation (TLV), and vary with body position. Methods. In sixteen anesthetized juvenile pigs, intra-pleural pressure sensors were placed in ventral, dorsal, and caudal zones of the left hemithorax by video-assisted thoracoscopy. A right thoracotomy was performed and lipopolysaccharide administered intravenously to mimic the inflammatory response due to thoracic surgery. Animals were ventilated in a volume-controlled mode with a tidal volume (V(T)) of 6 mL kg(−1) during TLV and of 5 mL kg(−1) during OLV and a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH(2)O. Global and local transpulmonary pressures were calculated. Lung instability was defined as end-expiratory P(L)<2.9 cmH(2)O according to previous investigations. Variables were acquired during TLV (TLVsupine), left lung ventilation in supine (OLVsupine), semilateral (OLVsemilateral), lateral (OLVlateral) and prone (OLVprone) positions randomized according to Latin-square sequence. Effects of position were tested using repeated measures ANOVA. Results. End-expiratory P(L) and ΔP(L) were higher during OLVsupine than TLVsupine. During OLV, regional end-inspiratory P(L) and ΔP(L) did not differ significantly among body positions. Yet, end-expiratory P(L) was lower in semilateral (ventral: 4.8 ± 2.9 cmH(2)O; caudal: 3.1 ± 2.6 cmH(2)O) and lateral (ventral: 1.9 ± 3.3 cmH(2)O; caudal: 2.7 ± 1.7 cmH(2)O) compared to supine (ventral: 4.8 ± 2.9 cmH(2)O; caudal: 3.1 ± 2.6 cmH(2)O) and prone position (ventral: 1.7 ± 2.5 cmH(2)O; caudal: 3.3 ± 1.6 cmH(2)O), mainly in ventral (p ≤ 0.001) and caudal (p = 0.007) regions. Lung instability was detected more often in semilateral (26 out of 48 measurements; p = 0.012) and lateral (29 out of 48 measurements, p < 0.001) as compared to supine position (15 out of 48 measurements), and more often in lateral as compared to prone position (19 out of 48 measurements, p = 0.027). Conclusion. Compared to TLV, OLV increased lung stress. Body position did not affect stress of the ventilated lung during OLV, but lung stability was lowest in semilateral and lateral decubitus position. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10436328/ /pubmed/37601645 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1204531 Text en Copyright © 2023 Wittenstein, Scharffenberg, Yang, Bluth, Kiss, Schultz, Rocco, Pelosi, Gama de Abreu and Huhle. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Wittenstein, Jakob
Scharffenberg, Martin
Yang, Xiuli
Bluth, Thomas
Kiss, Thomas
Schultz, Marcus J.
Rocco, Patricia R. M.
Pelosi, Paolo
Gama de Abreu, Marcelo
Huhle, Robert
Distribution of transpulmonary pressure during one-lung ventilation in pigs at different body positions
title Distribution of transpulmonary pressure during one-lung ventilation in pigs at different body positions
title_full Distribution of transpulmonary pressure during one-lung ventilation in pigs at different body positions
title_fullStr Distribution of transpulmonary pressure during one-lung ventilation in pigs at different body positions
title_full_unstemmed Distribution of transpulmonary pressure during one-lung ventilation in pigs at different body positions
title_short Distribution of transpulmonary pressure during one-lung ventilation in pigs at different body positions
title_sort distribution of transpulmonary pressure during one-lung ventilation in pigs at different body positions
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10436328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37601645
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1204531
work_keys_str_mv AT wittensteinjakob distributionoftranspulmonarypressureduringonelungventilationinpigsatdifferentbodypositions
AT scharffenbergmartin distributionoftranspulmonarypressureduringonelungventilationinpigsatdifferentbodypositions
AT yangxiuli distributionoftranspulmonarypressureduringonelungventilationinpigsatdifferentbodypositions
AT bluththomas distributionoftranspulmonarypressureduringonelungventilationinpigsatdifferentbodypositions
AT kissthomas distributionoftranspulmonarypressureduringonelungventilationinpigsatdifferentbodypositions
AT schultzmarcusj distributionoftranspulmonarypressureduringonelungventilationinpigsatdifferentbodypositions
AT roccopatriciarm distributionoftranspulmonarypressureduringonelungventilationinpigsatdifferentbodypositions
AT pelosipaolo distributionoftranspulmonarypressureduringonelungventilationinpigsatdifferentbodypositions
AT gamadeabreumarcelo distributionoftranspulmonarypressureduringonelungventilationinpigsatdifferentbodypositions
AT huhlerobert distributionoftranspulmonarypressureduringonelungventilationinpigsatdifferentbodypositions